hey! glad my rambling made some sense to you
honestly, for me the plan of this essay was actually the hardest bit to execute. i had a list of points i wanted to bring up, but wasn't sure how to tie them together or make them make sense... here's what i did in case that helps:
i first boiled down my notes to some more key concepts. i noticed that a lot of the things i'd written down could be grouped together or linked to one another. maybe they were about 2 characteristics that had a similar impact, or maybe they were both indicative of an underlying principle or stylistic choice. this was essentially
reducing all my ideas to their roots. that was the hardest part tbh.
once i had a handful of key ideas (sentences or key words really), i played around with them for a whiiile, trying to figure out the best way to group, order, or approach my proof of them. i'd
make a basic skeleton of the order, turn it around for a day or so in my mind, then
come back to it and t
weak it a little more. rinse and repeat. i ended up splitting the characteristics of the novel i wanted to talk about into 3 big groups (depending on the narrator). i then tried
establish an approach: a) describe the characteristic and hint towards its impact, then b) highlight that impact's link with postmodernism. sometimes, i spent more time discussing theory, sometimes, it took longer to describe the characteristic. i found that having decided to
split my paragraphs according to the narrative element made my life a whole lot easier than, say, splitting them according to effect. treating narrative devices one at a time was, in my opinion, what helped me make this more of a
literature essay than a
philosophy essay.
then, when i had my basic skeleton down, and had decided how i would approach my proofs and discussion, i
went back through my more lengthy notes and
fleshed out my arguments. that's when i added in the postmodern theory, the sources, the quotes, the specifications, etc.. basically the opposite of the first "boiling down" step, but hopefully this time a little bit more coherently.
unfortunately, i can't offer much guidance on how to structure a comparative EE, but hopefully this helps a little. this is, of course, just one way to do it! other folks have loads of other strategies to plan their essays, depends on what works for you! i just think very messily sometimes, so
simplifying things at the beginning of the planning process helped me deal with them much more effectively. it's also very possible that, part way through writing your essay, you realise "hey, the transition would be much more smooth if i switched the order of these two ideas" (it happened to me a few times!). don't worry about, try to
stay flexible with your plan if you can! you'll most likely get a feel for what flows and what doesn't as you write.
i've attached both the plan i used to write my EE as well as my final copy (which is not to say that there aren't typos in it... there are lol) i also just double checked my grade just to give you an idea of what this scores, and i got a 28 which is the upper boundary for a B (oooone little point away from an A.. curses!) hope this helps!!