Are you thankful for Hitler and WW2?

yup I'm thankful that millions of innocent people were murdered in cold blood for no other reason than their ethnicity/religion/sexual orientation etc man like Hitler what would have we have done without him?

You missed the point completely i am thankful for him instigating WW2 and freeing people from colonial regimes were JUST AS BRUTAL as the nazi one.

k, which colonial regime killed as many people as the Nazis did?
I'll wait.
it's a stupid question - your question should be something along the lines of, "did some good things come out of WW2?"

Belgian british spanish all killed far in excess than the german one.

source?

Wait.
This thread isn't sarcastic?

They did actually. Just Google King Leopold II in Congo

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Atrocities_in_the_Congo_Free_State

You're delusional.

No friend just hope people realise that without ww2 much of the world would be dust and its citizens completely ruined.

So you would happily live in excruciating poverty in the british raj or the equally pleasant belgian congo???? None of these countries would be free without ww2 and if u are of dark complexion u would have to bow down to ur white masters for the rest of time.

decolonisation probably would have occurred with or without WW2 regardless, I mean, the ball was already rolling pre-1939;

"Decolonization, as a political process, had been taking place for several decades prior to the end of WWII in 1945. Britain, for instance, had granted independence to South Africa in 1910; and had passed the Statute of Westminster in 1931, which granted most political independence to Australia; Canada; and New Zealand."

and if WW2 was the sole reason that decolonisation occurred, why were some colonies only grated independence nearly 20 years after the end of the war?
Surely if the war was sooo cataclysmic we would have seen an instantaneous period of total decolonisation.

and the fact that you ignore the mass fatalities and atrocities of the war and focus only on this one positive is indicative of just how oblivious you are.

I myself believe it is much of the worlds eternal luck that Hitler, indirectly, sucked the british and other european countries dry allowing the colonies to gain Independence, from what i am sure without ww2 the countries would have been subject to perpetual and infinite slavery if they had remained strong. Because even though may have claimed to have freed the people from their tyrannical rule for altruistic reasons it is well known that their main motive was that sucking the natives dry became unprofitable, although the french did fight some brutal wars to continue their brutal suppression of colonies, but ho hum they are the great beacons of 'freedom' and 'human rights' now.

The Nazi's were planning on taking over Africa anyways? Hitler ALREADY looked down on black people for their complexion even in prisoner of war camps where the Germans treated black people as lesser beings. So your point right there is irrelevant.
As for the poverty, are you seriously insinuating that the loss of millions of people's lives was a good price to pay in order to end this poverty?