My suspicion is that the questions was set by either a teacher with rubbish chemistry knowledge (like me) or a teacher who has good intentions and wants to set a novel equilibrium question, but who doesn't care about real world limitations over what is possible in chemistry.
Essentially, the Q boils down to:
AX6 <-> A + 6X
It shouldn't matter that AX6 doesn't and can't exist. The Q is attempting to test knowledge of LCP.
But purists like us do worry about Qs that are rubbish as they suggest to students that stuff doesn't matter.