Original post by 210555The debate in my opinion should be expanded to other elite universities too, where a lack of transparency is equally apparent, it is unfair to single out Oxbridge.However, it is an issue that then expands into society.
The solution is complex, me thinks. In terms of applications, it is about encouraging students to apply in the first place. Here there is still some way to go in terms of breaking down stereotypes. I have many friends at university from completely different backgrounds to me and they are great individuals. We need to educate people that snobbery can go both ways.
The solution in terms of admissions. I have listened to the BBC4 debate and find myself disagreeing with the Oxford Admissions representative. A Level grades are an indication of attainment and not academic potential. That attainment is helped by "privilege" (financial, parental support, type of school etc) I suspect many of us will agree on this.
The argument that there should be lower academic offers for individuals from less privileged backgrounds should be explored more and not dismissed outright. There "appears" to be a genuine lack of understanding of how difficult it is to ensure students with potential from certain backgrounds, have access to the support required to attain AAA or A*AA etc. For some degrees where prior knowledge is required this may not be practical. However, these universities do offer courses where it may be able to consider lowering offers in some cases and where applicable.
As I say, a complex issue that is prevalent amongst many "elite" universities, not just Oxbridge.