The Student Room Group

This discussion is now closed.

Check out other Related discussions

CTAM: Count to a million (Part 19)

Scroll to see replies

196,681

Good thinking markov - indeed, that didn't count for the longer term, regarding if we get any slumps like what we had before on that weird 9 month thread... :tongue:
196682

Posted from TSR Mobile
Original post by spotify95
196,681

Good thinking markov - indeed, that didn't count for the longer term, regarding if we get any slumps like what we had before on that weird 9 month thread... :tongue:


The idea is to build up a good excess/bank of posts, that way we can afford slow periods. And in the case we go into minus/behind schedule, as seen happened before, Counters will generally have a drive to get it back positive again. I wouldn't be against changing the target to say 360-400.

196683

Posted from TSR Mobile
196684

Posted from TSR Mobile
196685

Posted from TSR Mobile
196686

Posted from TSR Mobile
Original post by markovchain17
The idea is to build up a good excess/bank of posts, that way we can afford slow periods. And in the case we go into minus/behind schedule, as seen happened before, Counters will generally have a drive to get it back positive again. I wouldn't be against changing the target to say 360-400.

196683

Posted from TSR Mobile


Indeed - that way, if we did have such times, whereby we were getting a very small amount of posts (say less than 50, which is not ideal at all - though I do remember once, we were struggling to do a page a day!), we would still have enough posts in surplus to keep things on track (overall) for our predicted completion date.

Obviously, getting more posts done (and therefore getting the thread completed sooner) would be better, but who knows what will happen?

Also, what do you think regarding CTAMIV and MTZ - what is your estimated completion date for those - or are they too slow to even predict a finish at all?

196,687
196688

Posted from TSR Mobile
196,689
196690

Posted from TSR Mobile
196691

Posted from TSR Mobile
196692

Posted from TSR Mobile
196693

Posted from TSR Mobile
196694
(edited 6 years ago)
Original post by markovchain17
The idea is to build up a good excess/bank of posts, that way we can afford slow periods. And in the case we go into minus/behind schedule, as seen happened before, Counters will generally have a drive to get it back positive again. I wouldn't be against changing the target to say 360-400.

196683

Posted from TSR Mobile


Agree with this, we're still very fragile, relying on only a limited number of regular posters.

You need at least two to pound the numbers, so we will have quiet periods.

196695
(edited 6 years ago)
196696

Posted from TSR Mobile
Original post by Phirstman
Agree with this, we're still very fragile, relying on only a limited number of regular posters.

You need at least two to pound the numbers, so we will have quiet periods.

196695


Yup, we can always check our estimated finish time at the end of each thread to see how fast we're going

196697

Posted from TSR Mobile
196698

Posted from TSR Mobile
196699

Posted from TSR Mobile
196700

Posted from TSR Mobile

Related discussions

Latest

Trending

Trending

Articles for you