Russiaphobia Is Out of Control

When a country armed to the teeth with nuclear weapons and overwhelmed by its own exceptionalism and indispensability has political and media lunatics equating a bait-click commercial marketing scheme with Pearl Harbor, that country is a recipe for the end of the world.
As has been made perfectly clear, Mueller’s “indictment” of 13 Russians and 3 companies is just another hoax. See here and here.
All Mueller has found is a bait-click commercial marketing scheme that had nothing to do with election interference.
Why is Mueller comfortable bringing a transparently false indictment?
The answer is, as Glenn Greenwald makes clear, that Mueller knows there are large numbers of warmongering politicians and media whores who will seize on the fake indictment as proof that Russia has “committed an act of war equivalent to Pearl Harbor and 9/11.” The fact that what Mueller has indicted is only a bait-click marketing scheme will never be mentioned by politicians and presstitutes shouting the military/security complex’s slogan that “Russia must be punished.”
Greenwald supplies the names of some of these reckless and irresponsible people who are willing to bring on war with their rants: politicians Hillary Clinton, John McCain, Jeanne Shaheen, Jerry Nadler, Marco Rubio—indeed almost all of Congress—Clinton aides such as Philippe Reines and John Podesta, and the legions of presstitutes such as Karen Tumulty, David Frum, Chuck Todd, Tom Friedman—indeed, the entirety of the print and TV media with the exceptions of Tucker Carlson and Pat Buchanan.
When a country armed to the teeth with nuclear weapons and overwhelmed by its own exceptionalism and indispensability has political and media lunatics equating a bait-click commercial marketing scheme with Pearl Harbor, that country is a recipe for the end of the world.
Note: Two presstitutes at Bloomberg, Lauren Etter and Ilya Arkhipov think that filming disadvantaged Americans in order to cast the US in a bad light is the same as interfering in the presidential election, and they think that a Russian food caterer is heading a Russian disinformation campaign.
This shows how utterly stupid the US media is. The entire article is based on nothing, just what some people say they think. Prigozhin’s business is a bait-click marketing scheme. What the utterly dishonest Mueller and the presstitutes are doing is turning a bait-click marketing scheme into an election interfering scheme. The only way this “indictment” could succeed in a court would be if no evidence could be presented, only Mueller’s absurd “indictment.”
Mueller’s “indictment” is not meant to go to court. It is just a propaganda device, and that is how the presstitutes are using it.
As Glenn Greenwald reports, three CNN “journalists” had to resign for their fake news “Russia threat” stories.
In actual fact, the entirely of the US print and TV media should have to resign.
This article was originally published at PaulCraigRoberts.org on February 21, 2018.

.

The problem is that russian government is indeed criminal. And the most of world sees that. But nowadays they are trying to interfere in Europe and that is something europeans and co. cannot allow (mafia in the government is not that great idea).

So they are trying to find any reason to attack Russia and to punish it.

But its okay when the west does it?

I'm curious if anyone has noticed but the only winners from this are the Americans - they dont loose anything through sanctions whilst eh Europeans loose billions and weve started buying their oil/gas. I'd rather remain friends with the Russians than Americans personally.

I mean they're definitely shady but then again so is the rest of Europe and the USA also. I think its more than Russia are being found out and the world needs a scapegoat - Trump seems to be very open about all of his shady business.

Interference does not mean interference into election.

You see the main problem in Russia is that it has mafia structures in the government to the point where the president is some kind of boss of multiple groups. And the started to spread this influence - nuclear superpower with trillions of money is capable to do that (though people themselves are not because they are bandits). All recent events - drugs in Argentina, massacre of russian army by USA (one group in Russia used USA to deal with another competing group), events with "special status" people and so on - are the precursors.

I presume the goal is to split Russia - considering the tension outside Moscow region it is possible - and leave that bandit group in Moscow region where they will be harmless (the only thing that USA is trying to do that gradually because those morons might decide to use nuclear weapons). Not to mention inside Russia tensions from the people also rise. They are tired of destruction of soviet legacy and handling it to sons, relatives of other people with power.

I would take USA side anytime instead of modern Russian government, who gradually falls into not just mafia state, but into autocracy (we are even joking here that Putin will become tsar lol). Currently there is a war over european market. And the goal is to prevent Europe to deal with Russia at all.
Americans are good players - but it is not surprising - after all USA was built by jews with the knowledge of past failures.

The west has an exceptionally long history of rigging elections for people they like [or simply staging coups] we abrogated the moral high ground a long time ago.

Yes its called the power vertical
Er when was the Russian army massacred by the yanks .

That is the Kremlins overarching fear, having the west disassemble it [or simply incite regions to break away]

I feel you have absolutely no clue about America and its heinous actions. It has actively aided in genocides [indonesia], aided in the use of WMDS [iraq], murdered civillians [iran], invaded for oil and preferential treatment [iraq, most of south/central america] If you think the americans have anyone but there best interestsat heart you are wrong.

The only ones who cares about morality are liberals because they, you know, believe that they are righteous or something.

Recently in Syria. Though it was private groups but whatever - it was one-sided. After all it was the troops of one rivals

They reap what they sew. Historically Russia did not have colonies so its government used the people in places of slaves. And nowadays regions are tired of constantly feeding Moscow. My bet we'll have multiple countries on the west (some territories will back to european countries), Moscow kingdom or something, Syberian republic (working mainly with asians). Not mention Chinese desire to get its historical land, Japanese desires and others + tons of **** beside Turkey, Armenia.

Imperialism has been always like this. I don't call USA the saint. I am not the liberal. But they have the right of strong. China is also expanding around towards different countries. But all countries in the history did that. Assyrians, Ottomans, Roman Empire.
Though the fight between globalism and imperialism is interesting one.

I've got couple of predictions. But with the new middle ages coming I am not sure what might happen

By absolutely no metric does that count as America beating Russia?
by that logic ISIS frequently beat America when they spanked various proxies for the Americans.

How exactly are you defining a colony here? With regard to the rest of your sentiment in the long term possibly [but then again everything can be proved possible with the advent of time] in the near and mid term? Not a chance.

Who is and what're you?
I feel drawing parallels between ancient civilizations and modern ones is always frought with problems least of all because aside from in the very broadest of strokes they are completely different.

Pray tell?

I believe in possible future that would look like this - not every region but west european and USA - wealthy, highly developed cities with the latest technologies and uneducated, religious regions. Dystopia. Eventually uneducated folk will start the war to destroy the cities. Rinse and repeat.

Primitive, aggressive civilizations usually destroy the advanced and merciful ones.

Probably because of media portrayal more than anything else TBH.

Russia is actively aware of the prospect of M.A.D (mutually assured destruction) in the event of war breaking out with any other geopolitical super power.

I don't really think that (sorry can't quote for some weird reason) I honestly think that it's about politics I mean in some parts people are pro-Russia. No one can really undermine M.A.D (it's a bit of a misconception) even if those missiles were shot out of the air I would say there's a fair chance that the warhead could detonate regardless, leading to an atmospheric detonation which would still affect a country (via nuclear fallout and EMP) either way no one really wins. plus it's impossible to determine between types of warhead.

Putin would have you killed for taking his last Rolo.

Maybe, maybe not - i mean i tend to side with that argument simply due to the number of missiles the SMT et al. field it would require a vast number of interceptors to make a difference.
Alas it makes very little difference this opinion as the only one that matters is Russias and they take a very dim view on it.