Why do women want gender equality in the workplace, but not in dating?

What??? Women were treated with disdain and you are trying to say that it never happened. Wow, ok.

Typo error,most women are down to earth and simple! *

Care to elaborate why you disagree?

But I've never claimed women have not been treated with disdain, by all means go back through the thread. It seems to me that you are struggling to support an assertion and so trying to deflect from it. My questions were valid and reasonable, either you can or cannot answer them. If you cannot answer them just say so, there's no shame in it.

To be precise they want equality only in those workplaces that (most of the time) related to some not very physical or exhausting activities that even can be enjoyable in a sense (so they often reference IT in that regard, but never mining and so on)

The main reason for my disagreement is probably due to the fact that you've provided absolutely no sources of evidence for your emphatic assertions that "women are considerate and caring in general" and "women are all about love, care and compassion".

To be precise they want equality only in those workplaces that (most of the time) related to some not very physical or exhausting activities that even can be enjoyable in a sense (so they often reference IT in that regard, but never mining and so on)

I agree. They want “equality” in high pay low risk employment like law, finance or consulting, but never mention the other jobs like construction, police and other types of not-so-glamorous roles.

What sources? I'm a woman myself and most women possesses those qualities listed above. Motherhood is a great example of women being caring. Women are nurturing and in most cases the primary caregiver. A woman's love is endless and endures all pain. And even when a woman Is hurting,we are still able to love. God bless women

...

In 1929, women were named legally 'persons' in Canada. So it was in law...

What a load of baloney! I work in the construction industry, And there are plenty of female police officers too.

An increase in the influence of women in public life has often been associated with national decline. The later Romans complained that, although Rome ruled the world, women ruled Rome. In the tenth century, a similar tendency was observable in the Arab Empire, the women demanding admission to the professions hitherto monopolised by men. ‘What,’ wrote the contemporary historian, Ibn Bessam, ‘have the professions of clerk, tax-collector or preacher to do with women? These occupations have always been limited to men alone.’ Many women practised law, while others obtained posts as university professors. There was an agitation for the appointment of female judges, which, however, does not appear to have succeeded.

All conjecture. Where is your evidence for all of this? Whatever you yourself might be, you can't speak for all women.

Your claim was that many people believed women were not people. You haven't demonstrated what you mean by 'many' nor how you come by that quantitative assertion. You have only identified a change in law in Canada - that says nothing about how many people believed what. Remember also that what is or is not law is not of itself evidence of what people more widely believed.

Aren't women on average more compassionate and polite. I remember JP said that so I presume that there might be some statistics

...I think you're being silly...

I'd be happy to look at any and all statistics, but where exactly are they?

All conjecture. Where is your evidence for all of this? Whatever you yourself might be, you can't speak for all women.

But what about percentage? We are talking about equality here...

You made a simple and bold assertion about what many people believed which I asked you to demonstrate. You could not do so. Instead you have made reference to a legal change in Canada and called me names for good measure. Bad loser?