The UK is a joke

Strong grasp of migration history you have there.

Go on migration watch .com and educate yourself

I'm not upset. I am astounded by your combination of stupidity and arrogance. I am gleeful, watching your country go up in flames, while my country -and the rest of the EU- thrives. That's all.

Well of course the numbers are bigger now. Everything is. They have been getting bigger since the economic revolutions of the past 600 years

You are not advocating a return to fedalism are you? I would rather live in a high population economy combined with high producitivty so I don't have to toil in a field.

As usual it is leftists who are the ones actually defending capitalist developments.

How many Reichsma.. I mean euros is Mutti Merkel giving to you to spew lies and attack England, you are the perfect little German, willing to follow a leader blindly and willing to attack England, you know how that went for you twice in a row and it seems Germany once again is on a path to try and ruin Europe again, good luck with that as you have failed before and once again we will not stand whilst this happens.

Your union is looking shaky and we will be able to prove to all that out of the Reich is far better than being a puppet of Germany.

I am afraid the last time you had a moderatly succesful system of politcal puppets was the Holy Roman Empire but it seems that that was often ruled by your far smarter and currently far more politically smart Austrians, we can only hope for a reverse anschluss.

Our nation is becoming a joke. Free speech is held in contempt- if you have the wrong opinion there is now that much red tape in place that you are likely to get a conviction or if you are outside Britain you get banned from the country- mainly those with right wing conservative views.

Lets give you an example, the other day there was 3 journalists/ political activists they was from Canada, America and Austria. Lets make long story short and say that all 3 of these activists was detained through our terrorism legislation two of the three was detained for a few days and one of them was detained for 6 hours. The couple who was detained for a few days was detained because they was going to conduct an interview with Tommy Robinson and the other one was detained for 6 hrs on the basis of conducting a social experiment of handing out leaflets saying Allah is gay- bit of a trivial reason to ban someone for life from a nation- considering similar leaflets have been distributed saying god is gay- offences which are that major that schedule 7 of the terrorism act was cited as the reason for detention when zero of the three showed signs of committing a terrorist attack

What troubles me with this is that we are declaring war on freedom of speech with foreign reporters but ISIS terrorists can and have passed free of detention who have fought for ISIS Syria 400-450 terrorists have thought to have returned. This is a disgrace- this is what Mrs May was looking at with the Social Chapter by the looks of things to close down free speech of right wing conservatives. This is tolerance, this is censorship. This is a witch-hunt!

What makes things worse Salman Abedi the Manchester Arena terrorist was allowed to return to the UK from going to a bomb making school in Libya- no questions asked not even when he got back to Britain was he retained, this is despite him being on a prospected terrorist list.

Everyone else laugh at us- we are now a joke nation.

Nope. "Mass immigration" was going on before world war 2. You are right though. There were alot of racists back then as well.

I'm alright thanks.

How am I even suggesting that we return to feaudalism, in the 1900's we were not a feudal state, we could easily return to a lower immigration rate and be successful.

You seem to view immigration as a fundamnetally negative thing to a country's development and want to revert to a fake idealised past. Which to me is like bascially saying we want lower number to the point where we have to go back to all working on farms all day.

There was xenophobic uproar in the 1900s about immigration. It is really nothing new. The mass upheavel of human societies has been going on for centuries.

Reducing immigration numbers for it's own sake is not only harmful to us in terms of loosing valuable cogs in the economic machine, it is also anti-humanist. The reality of borders is brutal state coercion (this is another example of where the left is more anti statism than a lot of the right). There use can only be defended when you have better choice. I am not prepared to sell the poeple I used to work with down a river for something which isn't even nececery.

Actions have consequences and the conseqences of what you and people like you want are bad for individual poeple who are effected by them. It isn't even needed and woule be on the whole harmful to us as a whole. It's just vindictive stupidity.

This isn't intrinsically international leftism, it is also Adam Smith increasing human liberty and utility.

Really? Who are you talking about? Literally the rest of the world is laughing at your economy tanking, inflation rising, and only relevant industry leaving.



No, you are uneducated and xenophobic for being so economically illiterate to believe you could actually be successful outside the massive trade bloc on your doorstep that you owe most of your modest wealth to, and for voting Leave on the back of a xenophobia-driven campaign to 'keep those dirty foreigners out' and 'take back your country' - how pathetic.

You seem to view immigration as a fundamnetally negative thing to a country's development and want to revert to a fake idealised past. Hence the anology to idealising fuedalism.

There was xenophobic uproar in the 1900s about immigration. It is really nothing new. The mass upheavel of human societies has been going on for centuries.

Reducing immigration numbers for it's own sake is not only harmful to us in terms of loosing valuable cogs in the economic machine, it is also anti-humanist. The reality of borders is brutal state coercion (this is another example of where the left is more anti statism than a lot of the right). There use can only be defended when you no better choice. I am not prepared to sell the poeple I used to work with down a river for something which isn't even nececery. Although you are getting what you want. Poeple are leaving or not comming simply becuase you lot are making i abundantly clear you want them to **** off. Unsurprisingly this makes our country a less appealing country to live in, so well done.

Actions have consequences and the conseqences of what you and people like you want are bad for individual poeple who are effected by them. It isn't even needed and would be on the whole harmful to us as a whole. It's just vindictive stupidity.

This isn't intrinsically international leftism, it is also Adam Smith increasing human liberty and utility.

I view mass immigration as a negative to culture and whilst in the short term it might provide workers it will not pay off in the long run, especially with social cohesion and the preservation of culture.

well borders are very important and hardly brutal so brutal that we let thoustands and thousands of people in to a land that was created and maintained due to borders and the state, removing borders would be impossible and totally insane if we have more than 1 country, it would also lead to poor countries just mass migrating to richer countries and in turn destroying both countries.


Me supporting a smaller government (Although I have been debating this recently) does not mean I support no government, and in my opinion it is not a scale from Evil to Good, I would rather a very very large government than no government, Adam smith would have never even thought that this level of immigration would be possible.

Yeah certainly deporting someone who is trying to come from say Somalia is bad for them, but is it better for society, there are plenty of evils that we have to accept, is taxation good personally for me NO I would love to have more money but it is the basis of society.

If you think this country is a joke feel free to leave. This country has a proud history of standing up to fascists and those who want to spread hatred, and we have a proud history of welcoming those in need and who want to come here.

And the reason why Salman Abedi was allowed to return to the UK is because he's a British citizen, unlike Lauren Southern, who is a foreigner.

Although you made some fair points, i think the post was generally idiotic.

First and foremost, you cannot stop your citizen from returning to their homeland. Salman Abedi and others could not be banned because they were British Citizens.

Two, terrorism is not only defined as political movement, you can have ideological terrorism which can come from liberal and conservative groups. In my opinion, the Government were right to ban known ideological terrorists from entering the country. Those people were not British, so why should they be here to pour their poison into the British consciousness.

I think you need to be careful with the whole idea of “free speech”, there is no such thing as absolute freedom. If you made a threatening remark to the Queen, the police and anti-terror police will be all over you that you may not even survive the interrogation.

Anyway, I’d suggest that you calm down. No need to go on a rampage.