Malaysia parliament propose an anti fake news bill.
THE Cabinet had on Wednesday passed the Anti-Fake News Bill 2018. The bill is expected to be tabled for its second reading in the Dewan Rakyat this week.
The following are remarks by Minister in the Prime Minister’s Department, Datuk Seri Azalina Othman Said, on the legislation.
Q: Why did the government introduce this new legislation and what are the challenges, seeing that there are some existing laws to stem fake news?
A: The issue of dissemination of fake news is a global problem, following the technological communication revolution, which is happening at a rapid pace. Of late, Malaysia has faced numerous challenges as an effect from fake news which not only confuses the public but can also threaten the safety, economy, prosperity and well-being of the people and the country.
As such, a new approach, such as introducing a new bill, is critical. In fact, some other countries have already realised that fake news is a global threat to the world of information, and needs to be tackled swiftly and effectively. In Singapore, for example, a Select Committee On Deliberate Online Falsehoods: Causes, Consequences And Counter-Measures was set up to study the problem of fake news, types of offenders and their motive in disseminating fake news, as well as its effects. This includes the possibility of setting up new laws to combat fake news.
The Philippines has already drafted a bill to tackle fake news, which is the Anti-Fake News Bill 2017, which makes it an offence to offer, publish, distribute and spread fake news.
We have to understand that although there are relevant laws, but until today, the rapid and complex development of communications technology means the problem still cannot be managed effectively. What more, these laws, such as the Penal Code, Printing Presses and Publications Act 1984, and Communications and Multimedia Act 1998, were drafted during or before the 1990s, and could not address the nature of increasingly complex offences in line with rapid technological progress.
As such, new elements will be introduced in this bill. Among the proposals are to not restrict the offences to Malaysia, which demonstrates the government’s seriousness in addressing the issue of fake news spread by those outside Malaysia.
Apart from a clear definition or illustration of what constitutes fake news, the bill also provides for punishment for those who fund the dissemination of fake news, not removing fake news when required, and others. At the same time, the bill also creates temporary measures to stem fake news while investigation and prosecution is being done.
Q: Is the definition of ‘fake news’ in this bill of a general or specific nature?
A: In the proposed bill, the government has taken initiatives to provide a clear and specific definition of fake news, including illustrations on situations which demonstrate fake news. The bill defines fake news any news, information, data and report, either a part of or wholly false whether in an article, visual or audio recording or in any form that can visualise words or ideas. It has to be stressed that at this time, there are no laws directly related to fake news.
Q: In this context, who decides whether a piece of news or information is fake or otherwise?
A: In this matter, the government has decided to allow a neutral and fair party, which is the courts, to decide, which is by due process of law. The courts will have the power to rule on the disposal of any publication deemed to contain fake news.
Q: There are claims that this bill will curtail freedom of speech. What is the government’s view on this?
A: This is an unsubstantiated and politically-motivated claim. No laws formulated and passed in Parliament are meant to stem freedom of speech, as provided for under the Federal Constitution.
In addition, under the leadership of the Prime Minister, the government has undertaken a legal transformation through the abolishment of the Internal Security Act 1960, introduced the Peaceful Asse
mbly Act 2012, which has helped the right to free speech.
The bill was drafted in accordance with the power of attorney as provided for in Paragraph (a) Clause 2, Article 10 of the Federal Constitution.
The proposed bill is aimed at protecting the public from fake news and, at the same time, ensuring that their right to speech and expression under the Federal Constitution is respected.
Q: Will this bill provide for heavier penalties?
A: The bill is of a deterrent nature, to give a clear message that each individual should be responsible for the sharing of true and healthy information. Those found guilty of circulating fake news can be fined or jailed, or subjected to both penalties. In addition, the Court can also order those found guilty to make an open apology to the affected party.
At the same time, the bill will also give a clear message that the government will not compromise in the matter of dissemination of fake news that can undermine public order or national security, and will continue to ensure that national security is preserved.
Hence, heavier penalties are provided based on the degree of the offence, including the imposition of fines and jail sentences.
Q: Is the bill only to control the spread of fake news in social media?
A: The bill regulates the dissemination of fake news in any medium of publication and is not restricted to social media.
Q: Will this bill address the dissemination of fake news in its entirety?
A: This bill expresses the government’s commitment to address the dissemination of fake news due to the rapid and intensive growth of communication technology.
In this regard, the bill will complement the existing provisions of the law. At the same time, the scope of this bill is extensive and exclusive to address offences pertaining to fake news thoroughly and effectively.
https://www.nst.com.my/news/nation/2018/03/349691/faqs-what-you-need-know-about-anti-fake-news-bill-2018
Should the UK do 1 too?
The following are remarks by Minister in the Prime Minister’s Department, Datuk Seri Azalina Othman Said, on the legislation.
Q: Why did the government introduce this new legislation and what are the challenges, seeing that there are some existing laws to stem fake news?
A: The issue of dissemination of fake news is a global problem, following the technological communication revolution, which is happening at a rapid pace. Of late, Malaysia has faced numerous challenges as an effect from fake news which not only confuses the public but can also threaten the safety, economy, prosperity and well-being of the people and the country.
As such, a new approach, such as introducing a new bill, is critical. In fact, some other countries have already realised that fake news is a global threat to the world of information, and needs to be tackled swiftly and effectively. In Singapore, for example, a Select Committee On Deliberate Online Falsehoods: Causes, Consequences And Counter-Measures was set up to study the problem of fake news, types of offenders and their motive in disseminating fake news, as well as its effects. This includes the possibility of setting up new laws to combat fake news.
The Philippines has already drafted a bill to tackle fake news, which is the Anti-Fake News Bill 2017, which makes it an offence to offer, publish, distribute and spread fake news.
We have to understand that although there are relevant laws, but until today, the rapid and complex development of communications technology means the problem still cannot be managed effectively. What more, these laws, such as the Penal Code, Printing Presses and Publications Act 1984, and Communications and Multimedia Act 1998, were drafted during or before the 1990s, and could not address the nature of increasingly complex offences in line with rapid technological progress.
As such, new elements will be introduced in this bill. Among the proposals are to not restrict the offences to Malaysia, which demonstrates the government’s seriousness in addressing the issue of fake news spread by those outside Malaysia.
Apart from a clear definition or illustration of what constitutes fake news, the bill also provides for punishment for those who fund the dissemination of fake news, not removing fake news when required, and others. At the same time, the bill also creates temporary measures to stem fake news while investigation and prosecution is being done.
Q: Is the definition of ‘fake news’ in this bill of a general or specific nature?
A: In the proposed bill, the government has taken initiatives to provide a clear and specific definition of fake news, including illustrations on situations which demonstrate fake news. The bill defines fake news any news, information, data and report, either a part of or wholly false whether in an article, visual or audio recording or in any form that can visualise words or ideas. It has to be stressed that at this time, there are no laws directly related to fake news.
Q: In this context, who decides whether a piece of news or information is fake or otherwise?
A: In this matter, the government has decided to allow a neutral and fair party, which is the courts, to decide, which is by due process of law. The courts will have the power to rule on the disposal of any publication deemed to contain fake news.
Q: There are claims that this bill will curtail freedom of speech. What is the government’s view on this?
A: This is an unsubstantiated and politically-motivated claim. No laws formulated and passed in Parliament are meant to stem freedom of speech, as provided for under the Federal Constitution.
In addition, under the leadership of the Prime Minister, the government has undertaken a legal transformation through the abolishment of the Internal Security Act 1960, introduced the Peaceful Asse
mbly Act 2012, which has helped the right to free speech.
The bill was drafted in accordance with the power of attorney as provided for in Paragraph (a) Clause 2, Article 10 of the Federal Constitution.
The proposed bill is aimed at protecting the public from fake news and, at the same time, ensuring that their right to speech and expression under the Federal Constitution is respected.
Q: Will this bill provide for heavier penalties?
A: The bill is of a deterrent nature, to give a clear message that each individual should be responsible for the sharing of true and healthy information. Those found guilty of circulating fake news can be fined or jailed, or subjected to both penalties. In addition, the Court can also order those found guilty to make an open apology to the affected party.
At the same time, the bill will also give a clear message that the government will not compromise in the matter of dissemination of fake news that can undermine public order or national security, and will continue to ensure that national security is preserved.
Hence, heavier penalties are provided based on the degree of the offence, including the imposition of fines and jail sentences.
Q: Is the bill only to control the spread of fake news in social media?
A: The bill regulates the dissemination of fake news in any medium of publication and is not restricted to social media.
Q: Will this bill address the dissemination of fake news in its entirety?
A: This bill expresses the government’s commitment to address the dissemination of fake news due to the rapid and intensive growth of communication technology.
In this regard, the bill will complement the existing provisions of the law. At the same time, the scope of this bill is extensive and exclusive to address offences pertaining to fake news thoroughly and effectively.
https://www.nst.com.my/news/nation/2018/03/349691/faqs-what-you-need-know-about-anti-fake-news-bill-2018
Should the UK do 1 too?
Fake news
Original post by Notoriety
With all due respect ... it's only Malaysia. Who really cares what their laws are.
Doesnt the same go for every country bar Britain then?
Original post by HucktheForde
THE Cabinet had on Wednesday passed the Anti-Fake News Bill 2018. The bill is expected to be tabled for its second reading in the Dewan Rakyat this week.
The following are remarks by Minister in the Prime Minister’s Department, Datuk Seri Azalina Othman Said, on the legislation.
Q: Why did the government introduce this new legislation and what are the challenges, seeing that there are some existing laws to stem fake news?
A: The issue of dissemination of fake news is a global problem, following the technological communication revolution, which is happening at a rapid pace. Of late, Malaysia has faced numerous challenges as an effect from fake news which not only confuses the public but can also threaten the safety, economy, prosperity and well-being of the people and the country.
As such, a new approach, such as introducing a new bill, is critical. In fact, some other countries have already realised that fake news is a global threat to the world of information, and needs to be tackled swiftly and effectively. In Singapore, for example, a Select Committee On Deliberate Online Falsehoods: Causes, Consequences And Counter-Measures was set up to study the problem of fake news, types of offenders and their motive in disseminating fake news, as well as its effects. This includes the possibility of setting up new laws to combat fake news.
The Philippines has already drafted a bill to tackle fake news, which is the Anti-Fake News Bill 2017, which makes it an offence to offer, publish, distribute and spread fake news.
We have to understand that although there are relevant laws, but until today, the rapid and complex development of communications technology means the problem still cannot be managed effectively. What more, these laws, such as the Penal Code, Printing Presses and Publications Act 1984, and Communications and Multimedia Act 1998, were drafted during or before the 1990s, and could not address the nature of increasingly complex offences in line with rapid technological progress.
As such, new elements will be introduced in this bill. Among the proposals are to not restrict the offences to Malaysia, which demonstrates the government’s seriousness in addressing the issue of fake news spread by those outside Malaysia.
Apart from a clear definition or illustration of what constitutes fake news, the bill also provides for punishment for those who fund the dissemination of fake news, not removing fake news when required, and others. At the same time, the bill also creates temporary measures to stem fake news while investigation and prosecution is being done.
Q: Is the definition of ‘fake news’ in this bill of a general or specific nature?
A: In the proposed bill, the government has taken initiatives to provide a clear and specific definition of fake news, including illustrations on situations which demonstrate fake news. The bill defines fake news any news, information, data and report, either a part of or wholly false whether in an article, visual or audio recording or in any form that can visualise words or ideas. It has to be stressed that at this time, there are no laws directly related to fake news.
Q: In this context, who decides whether a piece of news or information is fake or otherwise?
A: In this matter, the government has decided to allow a neutral and fair party, which is the courts, to decide, which is by due process of law. The courts will have the power to rule on the disposal of any publication deemed to contain fake news.
Q: There are claims that this bill will curtail freedom of speech. What is the government’s view on this?
A: This is an unsubstantiated and politically-motivated claim. No laws formulated and passed in Parliament are meant to stem freedom of speech, as provided for under the Federal Constitution.
In addition, under the leadership of the Prime Minister, the government has undertaken a legal transformation through the abolishment of the Internal Security Act 1960, introduced the Peaceful Asse
mbly Act 2012, which has helped the right to free speech.
The bill was drafted in accordance with the power of attorney as provided for in Paragraph (a) Clause 2, Article 10 of the Federal Constitution.
The proposed bill is aimed at protecting the public from fake news and, at the same time, ensuring that their right to speech and expression under the Federal Constitution is respected.
Q: Will this bill provide for heavier penalties?
A: The bill is of a deterrent nature, to give a clear message that each individual should be responsible for the sharing of true and healthy information. Those found guilty of circulating fake news can be fined or jailed, or subjected to both penalties. In addition, the Court can also order those found guilty to make an open apology to the affected party.
At the same time, the bill will also give a clear message that the government will not compromise in the matter of dissemination of fake news that can undermine public order or national security, and will continue to ensure that national security is preserved.
Hence, heavier penalties are provided based on the degree of the offence, including the imposition of fines and jail sentences.
Q: Is the bill only to control the spread of fake news in social media?
A: The bill regulates the dissemination of fake news in any medium of publication and is not restricted to social media.
Q: Will this bill address the dissemination of fake news in its entirety?
A: This bill expresses the government’s commitment to address the dissemination of fake news due to the rapid and intensive growth of communication technology.
In this regard, the bill will complement the existing provisions of the law. At the same time, the scope of this bill is extensive and exclusive to address offences pertaining to fake news thoroughly and effectively.
https://www.nst.com.my/news/nation/2018/03/349691/faqs-what-you-need-know-about-anti-fake-news-bill-2018
Should the UK do 1 too?
The following are remarks by Minister in the Prime Minister’s Department, Datuk Seri Azalina Othman Said, on the legislation.
Q: Why did the government introduce this new legislation and what are the challenges, seeing that there are some existing laws to stem fake news?
A: The issue of dissemination of fake news is a global problem, following the technological communication revolution, which is happening at a rapid pace. Of late, Malaysia has faced numerous challenges as an effect from fake news which not only confuses the public but can also threaten the safety, economy, prosperity and well-being of the people and the country.
As such, a new approach, such as introducing a new bill, is critical. In fact, some other countries have already realised that fake news is a global threat to the world of information, and needs to be tackled swiftly and effectively. In Singapore, for example, a Select Committee On Deliberate Online Falsehoods: Causes, Consequences And Counter-Measures was set up to study the problem of fake news, types of offenders and their motive in disseminating fake news, as well as its effects. This includes the possibility of setting up new laws to combat fake news.
The Philippines has already drafted a bill to tackle fake news, which is the Anti-Fake News Bill 2017, which makes it an offence to offer, publish, distribute and spread fake news.
We have to understand that although there are relevant laws, but until today, the rapid and complex development of communications technology means the problem still cannot be managed effectively. What more, these laws, such as the Penal Code, Printing Presses and Publications Act 1984, and Communications and Multimedia Act 1998, were drafted during or before the 1990s, and could not address the nature of increasingly complex offences in line with rapid technological progress.
As such, new elements will be introduced in this bill. Among the proposals are to not restrict the offences to Malaysia, which demonstrates the government’s seriousness in addressing the issue of fake news spread by those outside Malaysia.
Apart from a clear definition or illustration of what constitutes fake news, the bill also provides for punishment for those who fund the dissemination of fake news, not removing fake news when required, and others. At the same time, the bill also creates temporary measures to stem fake news while investigation and prosecution is being done.
Q: Is the definition of ‘fake news’ in this bill of a general or specific nature?
A: In the proposed bill, the government has taken initiatives to provide a clear and specific definition of fake news, including illustrations on situations which demonstrate fake news. The bill defines fake news any news, information, data and report, either a part of or wholly false whether in an article, visual or audio recording or in any form that can visualise words or ideas. It has to be stressed that at this time, there are no laws directly related to fake news.
Q: In this context, who decides whether a piece of news or information is fake or otherwise?
A: In this matter, the government has decided to allow a neutral and fair party, which is the courts, to decide, which is by due process of law. The courts will have the power to rule on the disposal of any publication deemed to contain fake news.
Q: There are claims that this bill will curtail freedom of speech. What is the government’s view on this?
A: This is an unsubstantiated and politically-motivated claim. No laws formulated and passed in Parliament are meant to stem freedom of speech, as provided for under the Federal Constitution.
In addition, under the leadership of the Prime Minister, the government has undertaken a legal transformation through the abolishment of the Internal Security Act 1960, introduced the Peaceful Asse
mbly Act 2012, which has helped the right to free speech.
The bill was drafted in accordance with the power of attorney as provided for in Paragraph (a) Clause 2, Article 10 of the Federal Constitution.
The proposed bill is aimed at protecting the public from fake news and, at the same time, ensuring that their right to speech and expression under the Federal Constitution is respected.
Q: Will this bill provide for heavier penalties?
A: The bill is of a deterrent nature, to give a clear message that each individual should be responsible for the sharing of true and healthy information. Those found guilty of circulating fake news can be fined or jailed, or subjected to both penalties. In addition, the Court can also order those found guilty to make an open apology to the affected party.
At the same time, the bill will also give a clear message that the government will not compromise in the matter of dissemination of fake news that can undermine public order or national security, and will continue to ensure that national security is preserved.
Hence, heavier penalties are provided based on the degree of the offence, including the imposition of fines and jail sentences.
Q: Is the bill only to control the spread of fake news in social media?
A: The bill regulates the dissemination of fake news in any medium of publication and is not restricted to social media.
Q: Will this bill address the dissemination of fake news in its entirety?
A: This bill expresses the government’s commitment to address the dissemination of fake news due to the rapid and intensive growth of communication technology.
In this regard, the bill will complement the existing provisions of the law. At the same time, the scope of this bill is extensive and exclusive to address offences pertaining to fake news thoroughly and effectively.
https://www.nst.com.my/news/nation/2018/03/349691/faqs-what-you-need-know-about-anti-fake-news-bill-2018
Should the UK do 1 too?
Tbh, it's like a airport check but on a huge scale - similar to the Great Firewall of China.
Problem is that they are gona remove news 'deemed'' as fake, would this mean restricting access to the world wide web - since that's where such topics are spread around???
Original post by Napp
Doesnt the same go for every country bar Britain then?
The utility of pointing towards a country doing X, legislating for X, is that it suggests it could happen here. In a sense, we inherit all the due diligence they conducted, all the consultations with NGOs, and the time-consuming navigation between tricky provisions and bad consequences, and we incorporate these into our legislative agenda.
However, if you're talking about a country whose legislative is not a well-oiled machine, you're simply illustrating that a random country somewhere has taken a punt on X.
Ah, reminds me of when Reddit rejoiced after Singapore did the same. Singapore, far from a bastion of free press to begin with.
This moral panic over "fake news" is driving people to clamour for authoritarian regimes to start dictating what is and is not Truth. The same governments who find it convenient to make up their own truths (WMDs in Iraq!) and censor objective truths (Theresa May hiding reports that find the Wrong things).
This will give a new meaning to Political Correctness, although it is not a left-vs-right issue - it will eventually bite everyone who disagrees with their government.
This moral panic over "fake news" is driving people to clamour for authoritarian regimes to start dictating what is and is not Truth. The same governments who find it convenient to make up their own truths (WMDs in Iraq!) and censor objective truths (Theresa May hiding reports that find the Wrong things).
This will give a new meaning to Political Correctness, although it is not a left-vs-right issue - it will eventually bite everyone who disagrees with their government.
(edited 6 years ago)
Original post by AngeryPenguin
Good, following in the footsteps of Singapore and China.
I think it is great that governments are finally putting the foot down on Russian propaganda.
Thankfully, this may have extraterritorial application (https://twitter.com/imokman/status/978086370336911360), so even though we don't have our own Ministry of Truth, we may still feel the benefits of theirs.
I think it is great that governments are finally putting the foot down on Russian propaganda.
Thankfully, this may have extraterritorial application (https://twitter.com/imokman/status/978086370336911360), so even though we don't have our own Ministry of Truth, we may still feel the benefits of theirs.
'Russian Propaganda'
Yeah, as if, we are regularly exposed to a slew of anti Russian propaganda but the Russians defending themselves is propaganda
Original post by Napp
Aye the missus is from Malaya and showed this to me - she was less than impressed with the government screwing around with the laws for their own gain.
I too wish we could go back to the days of the Empire. Rhodesia, Ceylon, British Honduras and Mesopotamia.
On point - isn't Malaysia all about fake news? Don't they still claim to be a 3rd World country despite the obvious evidence to the contrary?
Original post by Trinculo
I too wish we could go back to the days of the Empire. Rhodesia, Ceylon, British Honduras and Mesopotamia.
On point - isn't Malaysia all about fake news? Don't they still claim to be a 3rd World country despite the obvious evidence to the contrary?
On point - isn't Malaysia all about fake news? Don't they still claim to be a 3rd World country despite the obvious evidence to the contrary?
Then which "World" should Malaysia be in? You don't get to choose to be a 3rd World country, not involved in the West/NATO and the East/Communist makes you a 3rd World country.
Original post by _JB_
Then which "World" should Malaysia be in? You don't get to choose to be a 3rd World country, not involved in the West/NATO and the East/Communist makes you a 3rd World country.
That is literally what Malaysia decided to do back in the 90s. The Prime Minister declared the country to be third world and set a programme to becoming industrialised by 2020.
It's all obvious nonsense, and I'm sure it had something to do with development loans and aid. But it goes to show - some people will declare themselves rubbish. They just will.
Original post by Trinculo
That is literally what Malaysia decided to do back in the 90s. The Prime Minister declared the country to be third world and set a programme to becoming industrialised by 2020.
It's all obvious nonsense, and I'm sure it had something to do with development loans and aid. But it goes to show - some people will declare themselves rubbish. They just will.
It's all obvious nonsense, and I'm sure it had something to do with development loans and aid. But it goes to show - some people will declare themselves rubbish. They just will.
Category wise, Malaysia is a Third world country for Cold War definition. But Malaysia definitely is not the modern definition of Third world country (take me awhile to realise you are talking about this), we are actually doing quite well here. Just not good enough, to get an education at UK/US is impossible unless you are at the upper middle class or scholarship that forces you to work for 5/7years. And we don't know how much the government f**k the country as well, having one party ruling a country for so long really makes thing opaque.
For me, I don't rate Malaysia because I am planning to take a Pure Maths degree, I not going to be a Mathematician here, not viable at all. Understand the situation my country was in so I won't thrash my country so much.
(edited 6 years ago)
Original post by _JB_
Category wise, Malaysia is a Third world country for Cold War definition. But Malaysia definitely is not the modern definition of Third world country (take me awhile to realise you are talking about this), we are actually doing quite well here. Just not good enough, to get an education at UK/US is impossible unless you are at the upper middle class or scholarship that forces you to work for 5/7years. And we don't know how much the government f**k the country as well, having one party ruling a country for so long really makes thing opaque.
For me, I don't rate Malaysia because I am planning to take a Pure Maths degree, I not going to be a Mathematician here, not viable at all. Understand the situation my country was in so I won't thrash my country so much.
For me, I don't rate Malaysia because I am planning to take a Pure Maths degree, I not going to be a Mathematician here, not viable at all. Understand the situation my country was in so I won't thrash my country so much.
I am fully aware that Malaysia is a fully industrialised, high-tech nation with huge natural resources and many highly skilled workers.
I do not think for 1 second that Malaysia is Third World. I'm just saying that the Prime Minister back in the day declared it himself for whatever reasons.
Original post by Trinculo
I am fully aware that Malaysia is a fully industrialised, high-tech nation with huge natural resources and many highly skilled workers.
I do not think for 1 second that Malaysia is Third World. I'm just saying that the Prime Minister back in the day declared it himself for whatever reasons.
I do not think for 1 second that Malaysia is Third World. I'm just saying that the Prime Minister back in the day declared it himself for whatever reasons.
Btw, that prime minister you talk about walks away from the ruling party and now is one of the heads of the opposition party.
Any allegation of the Prime Minister being corrupt will be deemed fake news presumably.
Quick Reply
Related discussions
- 2023 King's Speech
- Rethinking the nation state - what a Labour Government could do
- Rishi Sunak relaunches plans to send asylum seekers to Rwanda
- UK politics AUA (Ask Us Anything) – no question too simple!
- Should i vote Labour?
- moon landing is fake
- Should young women just seek out older wealthy men?
- Any suggestions?
- Rwanda bill likely to be stalled at least till April after seven defeats in the Lords
- PhD application update plus worry
- Cost of living in london
- 2024 Budget: Chancellor Jeremy Hunt under pressure to cut taxes
- Monash University Malaysia
- International students transfer
- How to stop being jealous of spoiled siblings?
- Michelle Donelan / Freedom of Speech
- Help! What are CamSIS Data!?
- Edexcel A Level Politics Paper 2 (9PL0 02) 7th June 2023 [Exam Chat]
- Durham Uni (Unite Students Houghall) Tenancy takeover for 2024/2025
- London Accomondation Needed
Latest
Trending
Last reply 1 day ago
Why is the political left now censorious and authoritarian??Last reply 1 day ago
Is it true that British unis are prejudiced towards degrees from Scottish unis?Last reply 1 day ago
If the Russell Group was now a fair representation of what it still claims to beLast reply 2 weeks ago
TSR Goes Green: How important will the environment be in this year's election?Last reply 2 weeks ago
Research Rankings of universities if you add Research Quality & Intensity percentagesLast reply 1 month ago
Is University of Birmingham prestigious and respected well enough in UK ?Trending
Last reply 1 day ago
Why is the political left now censorious and authoritarian??Last reply 1 day ago
Is it true that British unis are prejudiced towards degrees from Scottish unis?Last reply 1 day ago
If the Russell Group was now a fair representation of what it still claims to beLast reply 2 weeks ago
TSR Goes Green: How important will the environment be in this year's election?Last reply 2 weeks ago
Research Rankings of universities if you add Research Quality & Intensity percentagesLast reply 1 month ago
Is University of Birmingham prestigious and respected well enough in UK ?
