I seem like the only one who hated the 20 marker. I wrote about generalisablity to humans, keeping them in good conditions, not having an unnecessary amount of animals, cost benefit and endangered animals are off limits but couldn't think of anything else. Wrote way too little I think.
I actually really liked the Watson and rayner + raine question. Really easy.
And the communication question I came back to last because I couldn't think of anything at first but then thought of some stuff at the end.
Funniest thing was my psych teacher went over peer review for the first time yesterday saying it was unlikely the come up but just in case and then it did!
Pleased overall, think the second paper was better but paper 3 was better than paper 1.