The Student Room Group

Is the post-Brexit Irish border a red herring?

It's physically impossible to create a border with Northern Ireland without going back to military control. Roads cross it dozens of times and it divides farms and houses. Even if anyone seriously suggested a checkpoint at every crossing there would be smuggling; and for political reasons it's undesirable.


So why not keep an open border like we currently have, for people and goods. We already have different tax rates, currencies and regulations. The fact they might be more different doesn't mean it wouldn't work.


The population of Ireland is less than 7 million people, even if we didn't have zero tariffs surely making an exception for free trade is better than breaking the Good Friday Agreement. We only spot check a tiny proportion of imports to our ports so we can rely on paperwork in Ireland.

Scroll to see replies

Reply 1
Because it isn't just Britains boarder it is also an EU one and if they don't want a non-boarder there shall not be one. Especially given the hilariously stupid ideas being thought up in Westminster.
Original post by bob072

So why not keep an open border like we currently have, for people and goods. We already have different tax rates, currencies and regulations. The fact they might be more different doesn't mean it wouldn't work.


Agreed. Unfortunately, that is completely incompatible with the concept of breaking away from the EU and having control over our own borders. And the sad thing is that in reality, we have never had control over our borders and never will. It is only law abiding people who fall foul of borders. Everyone else just skips over the fence / beach.
Reply 3
Original post by ByEeek
Agreed. Unfortunately, that is completely incompatible with the concept of breaking away from the EU and having control over our own borders. And the sad thing is that in reality, we have never had control over our borders and never will. It is only law abiding people who fall foul of borders. Everyone else just skips over the fence / beach.



Ireland aren't in Schengen so only EU nationals could use it as an illegal route to the UK. Immigration to Northern Ireland hasn't been a problematic amount so an open border for them is acceptable. If you want to get to mainland Britain 99.99% of people go by ferry or air so the solution is simple, make all operators check passengers have a right to travel here (eg passport)
Original post by bob072
Ireland aren't in Schengen so only EU nationals could use it as an illegal route to the UK. Immigration to Northern Ireland hasn't been a problematic amount so an open border for them is acceptable. If you want to get to mainland Britain 99.99% of people go by ferry or air so the solution is simple, make all operators check passengers have a right to travel here (eg passport)


No. But Ireland are in the common market and as such goods and services can move from Europe to Ireland tariff free. To leave the border between N and S Ireland totally open would create a backdoor into the EU whereby companies could circumnavigate tariffs by selling / licencing their goods to NI and then conveniently transporting them to Ireland and then the rest of Europe. It effectively makes a farce of the whole idea of leaving the EU.
Reply 5
Original post by ByEeek
No. But Ireland are in the common market and as such goods and services can move from Europe to Ireland tariff free. To leave the border between N and S Ireland totally open would create a backdoor into the EU whereby companies could circumnavigate tariffs by selling / licencing their goods to NI and then conveniently transporting them to Ireland and then the rest of Europe. It effectively makes a farce of the whole idea of leaving the EU.


That's true, but you have the same situation right across the world. For example the USA has WTO tariffs with the EU, but exporters could circumvent this by selling or moving their products across the border with Mexico through NAFTA then use Mexico's FTA with the EU.


Hopefully the negotiators will have the sense to continue with zero tariffs anyway.
Original post by bob072
That's true, but you have the same situation right across the world. For example the USA has WTO tariffs with the EU, but exporters could circumvent this by selling or moving their products across the border with Mexico through NAFTA then use Mexico's FTA with the EU.


Hopefully the negotiators will have the sense to continue with zero tariffs anyway.


Is that true though. Are you suggesting that the USA would get a better deal shipping goods through Mexico that direct to Europe?
Reply 7
Original post by bob072
That's true, but you have the same situation right across the world. For example the USA has WTO tariffs with the EU, but exporters could circumvent this by selling or moving their products across the border with Mexico through NAFTA then use Mexico's FTA with the EU.


Hopefully the negotiators will have the sense to continue with zero tariffs anyway.


It does not work, the goods require to be documented re their conformity and meet (and be accredited as meeting) the various requirements set for them to be traded into the other country. Frankly tariffs are the least of anyone's worries, they are merely dealt with using money to pay the charge. The requirements for goods to conform are detailed and it is not that they do conform it is that they need to be demonstrated to conform to be distributed within the EU.

http://ec.europa.eu/docsroom/documents/27401
Reply 8
Yeah, just leave it open. We don't mind free trade, and as long as we ensure employers are checking people have a right to work here (as they should already do) then it's fine. Ireland is already the tax haven entry route for several multinationals so that's something that needs to be addressed separately.

If the EU have a better proposal then they should present it. Because otherwise we can just do nothing and sort out things our end when it suits us.
Original post by bob072
Ireland aren't in Schengen so only EU nationals could use it as an illegal route to the UK. Immigration to Northern Ireland hasn't been a problematic amount so an open border for them is acceptable. If you want to get to mainland Britain 99.99% of people go by ferry or air so the solution is simple, make all operators check passengers have a right to travel here (eg passport)


First of all, we are primarily talking about goods not people.

Secondly the DUP will not tolerate a customs and immigration border between NI and the rest of the UK.
Reply 10
Original post by nulli tertius
First of all, we are primarily talking about goods not people.

Secondly the DUP will not tolerate a customs and immigration border between NI and the rest of the UK.


Who's we? I was replying to someone talking about movement of people.

That's the only way to do it, I don't think anyone would like the alternative of absolutely no checks across the Irish Sea.

The ideal situation would be if we weren't starting from here and Ireland hadn't been invaded then divided up.
Original post by bob072
Ireland aren't in Schengen so only EU nationals could use it as an illegal route to the UK. Immigration to Northern Ireland hasn't been a problematic amount so an open border for them is acceptable. If you want to get to mainland Britain 99.99% of people go by ferry or air so the solution is simple, make all operators check passengers have a right to travel here (eg passport)
According to the BBC the Catholic population will outnumber the Protestant population within 3 years. So there will be a majority to join the South and leave the UK. So security/border will no longer be a Brexit issue.
Reply 12
Original post by gerrygerry
According to the BBC the Catholic population will outnumber the Protestant population within 3 years. So there will be a majority to join the South and leave the UK. So security/border will no longer be a Brexit issue.


Yes that would be the ideal situation, and support is certainly moving in that direction, but don't forget not all Catholics are Republicans.
Original post by bob072
Yes that would be the ideal situation, and support is certainly moving in that direction, but don't forget not all Catholics are Republicans.


Absolutely I'm a (nominal) Catholic but it's never influenced my political views. The point is the politics in NI are strongly divided on sectarian grounds, this never changed even after the troubles stopped.
Reply 14
Original post by gerrygerry
According to the BBC the Catholic population will outnumber the Protestant population within 3 years. So there will be a majority to join the South and leave the UK. So security/border will no longer be a Brexit issue.


But when will they all get to voting age?:smile:
Since the BEEB article was talking about a voting majority, I assume they were talking about the population that was about to reach voting age. However, it's a detailed study so you can have a look at the actual article here,

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-northern-ireland-43823506
Reply 16
According to the BBC the Catholic population will outnumber the Protestant population within 3 years. So there will be a majority to join the South and leave the UK. So security/border will no longer be a Brexit issue.

That's been suggested for decades, but never materialised. Religion is less of an indicator of political stance than it was before and there have been plenty of moderate people from Roman Catholic backgrounds who saw remaining part of the UK as a pretty reasonable outcome. There's quite a big constituency of "don't rock the boat" unionists in Northern Ireland who wouldn't want to risk the (I think, pretty inevitable) chance of violence that any attempt to unify Ireland would now have.
Reply 17
Original post by L i b
That's been suggested for decades, but never materialised. Religion is less of an indicator of political stance than it was before and there have been plenty of moderate people from Roman Catholic backgrounds who saw remaining part of the UK as a pretty reasonable outcome. There's quite a big constituency of "don't rock the boat" unionists in Northern Ireland who wouldn't want to risk the (I think, pretty inevitable) chance of violence that any attempt to unify Ireland would now have.

Sorry, but denying the six counties the democratic decision to decide which country they are because of fears of terrorist violence is not the way to run any country. Unionists are free to move to Britain or continue carrying British passports and wave the union Jack in NI. Under the Good Friday Agreement which brought peace, there must be a referendum held if it looks like unifying with Ireland would win, and recent polling shows that.
Reply 18
Original post by bob072
Sorry, but denying the six counties the democratic decision to decide which country they are because of fears of terrorist violence is not the way to run any country. Unionists are free to move to Britain or continue carrying British passports and wave the union Jack in NI. Under the Good Friday Agreement which brought peace, there must be a referendum held if it looks like unifying with Ireland would win, and recent polling shows that.

Well, if the people of Northern Ireland decide to vote on that basis, it is entirely their own decision - whether you like it or not.

I don't see the Secretary of State calling a border poll any time soon, if that's what you're asking.
Reply 19
Original post by L i b
Well, if the people of Northern Ireland decide to vote on that basis, it is entirely their own decision - whether you like it or not.

I don't see the Secretary of State calling a border poll any time soon, if that's what you're asking.

They are legally obliged to, if polling continues the way it is.

Quick Reply

Latest

Trending

Trending