The Student Room Group

complex numbers

Hey guys,
so am struggling to understand this - can somebody help please? Thanks!!!
11.PNG

Scroll to see replies

Reply 1
Original post by Kalabamboo
Hey guys,
so am struggling to understand this - can somebody help please? Thanks!!!
11.PNG


To be honest, this answer seems insufficient. Real numbers are also complex; they just have 0 imaginary part. Clearly z + 2i can have 0 imaginary part if we choose z to have imaginary part -2i. But this is the only time when the equation can hold true, since |z| is real. Writing z = x + iy, see if you can derive a contradiction by plugging in |z| = root(x^2 + y^2), y = - 2.
Reply 2
Original post by math42
To be honest, this answer seems insufficient. Real numbers are also complex; they just have 0 imaginary part. Clearly z + 2i can have 0 imaginary part if we choose z to have imaginary part -2i. But this is the only time when the equation can hold true, since |z| is real. Writing z = x + iy, see if you can derive a contradiction by plugging in |z| = root(x^2 + y^2), y = - 2.

Hey thanks! But what do you mean by they just have 0 imaginary part?
Reply 3
Original post by Kalabamboo
Hey thanks! But what do you mean by they just have 0 imaginary part?


A real number can be viewed as a complex number with imaginary part 0. So a real number n can be viewed as n+0i.
(edited 5 years ago)
Reply 4
Original post by Kalabamboo
Hey thanks! But what do you mean by they just have 0 imaginary part?


All complex numbers can be written in the form abia bi where a and b are real integers. There's a real part and an imaginary part there. If b = 0, then there's no imaginary part.
(edited 5 years ago)
Reply 5
Thank you very much guys -this is all starting to make sense:smile:
Ok so continuing on..from math42's post
"To be honest, this answer seems insufficient. Real numbers are also complex; they just have 0 imaginary part. Clearly z + 2i can have 0 imaginary part if we choose z to have imaginary part -2i. But this is the only time when the equation can hold true, since |z| is real. Writing z = x + iy, see if you can derive a contradiction by plugging in |z| = root(x^2 + y^2), y = - 2. "
I got confused with the bold bit - could you please help?:smile:
Reply 6
Original post by Kalabamboo
Thank you very much guys -this is all starting to make sense:smile:
Ok so continuing on..from math42's post
"To be honest, this answer seems insufficient. Real numbers are also complex; they just have 0 imaginary part. Clearly z + 2i can have 0 imaginary part if we choose z to have imaginary part -2i. But this is the only time when the equation can hold true, since |z| is real. Writing z = x + iy, see if you can derive a contradiction by plugging in |z| = root(x^2 + y^2), y = - 2. "
I got confused with the bold bit - could you please help?:smile:


So we want to show that the equation |z| = z + 2i has no solutions, where z is a complex number.

To do this, we assume that it does have a solution, and see where this leads us. If it leads us to something which is clearly wrong/makes no sense, our initial assumption was wrong. This is a "proof by contradiction", which you may have seen.

Well, start by writing z = x + iy, where x,y are real (we know by definition that all complex numbers can be written this way). The equation for |z| is then |z| = root(x^2 + y^2) - it is the length of the line joining z to 0 in the complex plane.

So we have root(x^2 + y^2) = x + iy + 2i = x + i(y + 2).

The real and imaginary parts on each side have to match up. The left hand side is real, the right hand side has the imaginary bit i(y + 2). This must be 0 to match up with the left hand side, so y + 2 = 0, i.e. y = -2.

Then we get root(x^2 + y^2) = x. But y = -2, and (-2)^2 = 4, so root(x^2 + 4) = x. Can you see why this doesn't make sense?
Reply 7
Original post by math42
So we want to show that the equation |z| = z + 2i has no solutions, where z is a complex number.

To do this, we assume that it does have a solution, and see where this leads us. If it leads us to something which is clearly wrong/makes no sense, our initial assumption was wrong. This is a "proof by contradiction", which you may have seen.

Well, start by writing z = x + iy, where x,y are real (we know by definition that all complex numbers can be written this way). The equation for |z| is then |z| = root(x^2 + y^2) - it is the length of the line joining z to 0 in the complex plane.

So we have root(x^2 + y^2) = x + iy + 2i = x + i(y + 2).

The real and imaginary parts on each side have to match up. The left hand side is real, the right hand side has the imaginary bit i(y + 2). This must be 0 to match up with the left hand side, so y + 2 = 0, i.e. y = -2.

Then we get root(x^2 + y^2) = x. But y = -2, and (-2)^2 = 4, so root(x^2 + 4) = x. Can you see why this doesn't make sense?

Hey thanks a lot! But you know where you said |z| = root(x^2 + y^2)
- isn't it |z| = root(1^2 + i^2) because z = x + iy ?
Btw im thinking about the i + j + z notation... but in this case i is a number
Reply 8
Original post by Kalabamboo
Hey thanks a lot! But you know where you said |z| = root(x^2 + y^2)
- isn't it |z| = root(1^2 + i^2) because z = x + iy ?
Btw im thinking about the i + j + z notation... but in this case i is a number


No. It seems you're getting mixed up with general vectors. |z| is the length of the line from 0 to z. You can split this into horizontal and vertical components x and y (remember, the vertical axis is the imaginary axis, so you don't need to worry about including i in these calculations). Then just apply pythagoras to get root(x^2 + y^2).

complex.png
Original post by Kalabamboo
Hey guys,
so am struggling to understand this - can somebody help please? Thanks!!!
11.PNG


But z can be a complex number that has an imaginary part equal to -2i so that overall z+2i is real so your reasoning is not sufficient (in order to ensure the RHS is real you need the imaginary part of z to cancel out with the +2i which would obviously be -2i)

If we assume z = a-2i where a is the real part, then RHS = z+2i = a-2i+2i=a which is real
LHS = abs(z) = abs(a-2i) = sqrt (a^2+4)

So you are saying sqrt (a^2+4) = a
-----> a^2+4 = a^2
-----> 4=0 which is clearly not true so hence no solution

Note that
(edited 5 years ago)
Original post by math42
No. It seems you're getting mixed up with general vectors. |z| is the length of the line from 0 to z. You can split this into horizontal and vertical components x and y (remember, the vertical axis is the imaginary axis, so you don't need to worry about including i in these calculations). Then just apply pythagoras to get root(x^2 + y^2).

complex.png

Yes you're right! I am confusing it with vectors.
But then what form is z = x + iy written in? Is this something I would've done in A level maths cause it's not in vector form but it is so similar to it and i can't really compare it to anything else.
Could you pls kindly lemme know your thoughts?
Reply 11
Original post by Kalabamboo
Yes you're right! I am confusing it with vectors.
But then what form is z = x + iy written in? Is this something I would've done in A level maths cause it's not in vector form but it is so similar to it and i can't really compare it to anything else.
Could you pls kindly lemme know your thoughts?


Fundamentally, x + iy is just the standard form for complex numbers, real part plus imaginary part. But for the purposes of calculation you can liken it to the standard vectors you know if you like. In 2 dimensions you have the unit vectors i and j right? Well, here, your unit vectors would instead be, correspondingly, 1 and i, if that makes sense (don't confuse the two different "i"s; they aren't related to each other). So x + iy in the complex plane is like the vector xi + yj in the standard plane, which I assume you know has length root(x^2 + y^2).
Original post by math42
Fundamentally, x + iy is just the standard form for complex numbers, real part plus imaginary part. But for the purposes of calculation you can liken it to the standard vectors you know if you like. In 2 dimensions you have the unit vectors i and j right? Well, here, your unit vectors would instead be, correspondingly, 1 and i, if that makes sense (don't confuse the two different "i"s; they aren't related to each other). So x + iy in the complex plane is like the vector xi + yj in the standard plane, which I assume you know has length root(x^2 + y^2).

ah thanks so much!! so sorry my laptop decided to update at the wrong time
so I get what you did there - was wondering so you know how you said
"x + iy is just the standard form for complex numbers, real part plus imaginary part. " so the real part is always in the x direction and the imaginary part is always in the y direction? Also what's the point in having iy - why can't it just be i or y?

Thanks so much for answering my silly questions so far:smile:
It's just that I am quite new with complex numbers and the way they are written
Original post by math42
Fundamentally, x + iy is just the standard form for complex numbers, real part plus imaginary part. But for the purposes of calculation you can liken it to the standard vectors you know if you like. In 2 dimensions you have the unit vectors i and j right? Well, here, your unit vectors would instead be, correspondingly, 1 and i, if that makes sense (don't confuse the two different "i"s; they aren't related to each other). So x + iy in the complex plane is like the vector xi + yj in the standard plane, which I assume you know has length root(x^2 + y^2).

ah thanks so much!! so sorry my laptop decided to update at the wrong time
so I get what you did there - was wondering so you know how you said
"x + iy is just the standard form for complex numbers, real part plus imaginary part. " so the real part is always in the x direction and the imaginary part is always in the y direction? Also what's the point in having iy - why can't it just be i or y?

Thanks so much for answering my silly questions so far
It's just that I am quite new with complex numbers and the way they are written
Reply 14
Original post by Kalabamboo
ah thanks so much!! so sorry my laptop decided to update at the wrong time
so I get what you did there - was wondering so you know how you said
"x + iy is just the standard form for complex numbers, real part plus imaginary part. " so the real part is always in the x direction and the imaginary part is always in the y direction? Also what's the point in having iy - why can't it just be i or y?

Thanks so much for answering my silly questions so far
It's just that I am quite new with complex numbers and the way they are written


Yes, the real part is always in the x direction and the imaginary part is always in the y direction. Well, the "i" tells you that it's the imaginary component, the y tells you how big it is. If it was just x + y it would just be a real number. Complex numbers are precisely numbers of the form x + iy for x,y real.
Original post by math42
Yes, the real part is always in the x direction and the imaginary part is always in the y direction. Well, the "i" tells you that it's the imaginary component, the y tells you how big it is. If it was just x + y it would just be a real number. Complex numbers are precisely numbers of the form x + iy for x,y real.

Ah thank you so much - and you know i itself, is it like any imaginary number or is it just square root(-1)?
Reply 16
Original post by Kalabamboo
Ah thank you so much - and you know i itself, is it like any imaginary number or is it just square root(-1)?


i = root(-1), yes.
Original post by math42
i = root(-1), yes.

oooh so instead of writing complex number = x + iy
you could just write complex number = x + square root(-1)y where x and y are real numbers ?
Reply 18
Original post by Kalabamboo
oooh so instead of writing complex number = x + iy
you could just write complex number = x + square root(-1)y where x and y are real numbers ?


If you really wanted to, yes.
Original post by math42
If you really wanted to, yes.


Ahh thank you so much!

Quick Reply

Latest