Why do people hate Communism so much?

Right, so at least as far as I'm concerned Communism is the best economic and political ideology ever invented. No, I do not mean Soviet 'Communism', Chinese 'Communism', Cuban, North Korean, Vietnamese, Yugoslav, etc, etc, 'Communism'. As far as I'm concerned, those are all closer to Fascism than they are to real Communism in the sense that Marx envisioned (except Chinese 'Communism', that is closest to a Bourgeois Dictatorship).

So in case you didn't know exactly what I mean by this, I mean a highly decentralised, united world state where the collective resources of society produced by workers according to their ability all across the globe are pooled and redistributed according to need (ie if you biologically have a fast metabolism, you need more food than someone with slow metabolism, a healthy person doesn't need medication, etc), and then excess commodities and goods are completely equally distributed. The ideas of society shift, because, to directly quote the Communist Manifesto:

"Does it require deep intuition to comprehend that man's ideas, views and conceptions, in one word, mans consciousness, changes with every change in the conditions of his material existence, in his social relations and in his social life?What else does the history of ideas proeve, than that intellectual production changrs in chartacter in proportion as material production is changed? The ruling ideas of each age have ever been the ideas of it's ruling class."

Towards a mindset where, instead of being driven to great deeds by a motive for profit, they are instead motivated by a desire to help others, which helps themselves, because in a Communist society the condition for the betterment of the self is the betterment of all.

Before anyone argues "oh but then what if I do more work than this person why do I get paid the same", this is even more prevalent in Capitalist society. A doctor is a member of society many times more valuable and more hard working than a footballer, and yet a footballer is paid an order of magnitude more money than a doctor is. Equally, while you might scoff at a lowly sewage worker, or a bin man, claiming they do no real work and are lucky to get the salaries they have, consider for a moment what your street would look like if those menial workers decided to stop working for even a fortnight, and then decide whether or not those workers do an important, difficult job.

So, then, it is clear to me that Communism, as a theory, and presumably in practice (although obviously after letting Capitalism mature, then going through Socialsm, to gradually reform into Communism), is ideological perfection. Why, then, do people hate it so much? People seem to hate it almost as much as Nazism!

You felt my example was a bad one because what I said is impossible but you subsequently agreed that living under communism also wasn't within the capabilities of humans generally speaking. How can my comparison be a bad one on the grounds of impossibility when you agree that communism is also impossible?

Your response comes across as though you don't want to have a debate but want to close with some semblance of being right. My argument has been clear and consistent throughout

Right, so at least as far as I'm concerned Communism is the best economic and political ideology ever invented. No, I do not mean Soviet 'Communism', Chinese 'Communism', Cuban, North Korean, Vietnamese, Yugoslav, etc, etc, 'Communism'. As far as I'm concerned, those are all closer to Fascism than they are to real Communism in the sense that Marx envisioned (except Chinese 'Communism', that is closest to a Bourgeois Dictatorship).

So in case you didn't know exactly what I mean by this, I mean a highly decentralised, united world state where the collective resources of society produced by workers according to their ability all across the globe are pooled and redistributed according to need (ie if you biologically have a fast metabolism, you need more food than someone with slow metabolism, a healthy person doesn't need medication, etc), and then excess commodities and goods are completely equally distributed. The ideas of society shift, because, to directly quote the Communist Manifesto:

"Does it require deep intuition to comprehend that man's ideas, views and conceptions, in one word, mans consciousness, changes with every change in the conditions of his material existence, in his social relations and in his social life?What else does the history of ideas proeve, than that intellectual production changrs in chartacter in proportion as material production is changed? The ruling ideas of each age have ever been the ideas of it's ruling class."

Towards a mindset where, instead of being driven to great deeds by a motive for profit, they are instead motivated by a desire to help others, which helps themselves, because in a Communist society the condition for the betterment of the self is the betterment of all.

Before anyone argues "oh but then what if I do more work than this person why do I get paid the same", this is even more prevalent in Capitalist society. A doctor is a member of society many times more valuable and more hard working than a footballer, and yet a footballer is paid an order of magnitude more money than a doctor is. Equally, while you might scoff at a lowly sewage worker, or a bin man, claiming they do no real work and are lucky to get the salaries they have, consider for a moment what your street would look like if those menial workers decided to stop working for even a fortnight, and then decide whether or not those workers do an important, difficult job.

So, then, it is clear to me that Communism, as a theory, and presumably in practice (although obviously after letting Capitalism mature, then going through Socialsm, to gradually reform into Communism), is ideological perfection. Why, then, do people hate it so much? People seem to hate it almost as much as Nazism!

I don’t consider this a debate because we agree yet you decided to butt in and attempt to contradict me on a point I never made.

And yes I agree that ‘ living under communism also wasn't within the capabilities of humans generally speaking’ but that has nothing to do with your terrible comparison; it’s self explanatory that comparing how long someone can breath underwater to capability of society to live under any sort of extreme regime is just invalid.
Your argument has been misplaced. This is how it went:

OP asks question as to why communism is hated
I answer it objectively (i. e. to try and minimise my own bias on the issue)
You quote me starting with ‘but’ which means you somehow want to argue with me based on an OBJECTIVE answer and thus not knowing where I stand
I express confusion as to why you are discussing this with me and assuming my standing on the issue WHEN I NEVER EXPRESSED IT
Hence I get confused by your insistence on arguing with me about a point which I never expressed in the first place.

We can keep going but I tried to end it because of the above and because of how pointless this is. I don’t even have strong beliefs about communism, unlike you clearly? Also I don’t think anyone can be ‘right’ but you did start this whole debate without knowing where i stand and thus your presumptions were a bit wack ngl

Because communism has to engineer society in order for it to work, forcing outcomes on the populace. Also, one should be entitled to the fruits of their labour; not have the State take it and spread it elsewhere.

Wrong, I didn’t say ‘but’ therefore your whole premise that I was looking for a debate is wrong. I made the comparison and even if you felt that my comparison wasn’t a good one but essentially agreed with my position you could have said so. Instead you say you aren’t you aren’t prepared for someone to try and overturn your beliefs - if you felt we were on the same side why would you suggest I was trying to overturn your beliefs?

This is a critisism of a certain kind of communism (argubaly the dominant kind of the 20th century). But what if some peasants in 1930s Spain decide they are going to collectivise the land they work on? What if they decide to abolish money and give poeple labour time tokens which they can use to get scarse goods. They decide abundant goods are just avaiable in a collective warehouse free to access by anyone. The state is not involved here and I would say better rewards the fruits of poeple's labour than capitalism does. The richest people in capitalism do not sell even thier labour power do they? They do no labour.

The question then would be about recourse in terms of wider society, contacting and trading with them? Or for example, leaving this hypothetical collective? What becomes of one that has eschewed all financial and external links that then wishes to return?

How can communism be decentralized?

Communism is all fine and dandy in theory, but would never actually work in practice because humans don't function like that. It is in our genes to always aim higher, whether that means obtaining more power, goods, money, influence etc. There are always going to be people that cannot accept being on an equal footing with everyone else.