Jack and Brandon impersonate their friend Sue on a dating site and chat with John telling him that Sue has a rape roleplay fantasy (she doesn't). After a while of chatting John and 'Sue' (in reality Brandon and Jack) agree to meet up 'for a date' to fulfil Sue's fantasy. Jack and Brandon tell Sue that they set her up with a friend of theirs and send her on a date with John.
When Sue gets later into the elevator, John follows her and has sex with her against her will.
The question I have is could you say that Jack and Brandon cause Sue to engage in sexual activity without her consent and could be liable contrary to s4 of the SOA 2003?
I'm stuck because I feel like they did, but on the other hand, it was John who was the main actor who made her have sex with him.
What authority could I use to support either argument?