The Student Room Group

UK could "ban" social media

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-47019912

"Social media firms could be banned if they fail to remove harmful content, the health secretary has warned. "

First it was encryption, now it is social media :lol:

Scroll to see replies

Reply 1
Original post by Decahedron
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-47019912

"Social media firms could be banned if they fail to remove harmful content, the health secretary has warned. "

First it was encryption, now it is social media :lol:

It will go about as successfully as the proposed encryption ban.
Reply 2
Hahaha
Original post by Decahedron
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-47019912

"Social media firms could be banned if they fail to remove harmful content, the health secretary has warned. "

First it was encryption, now it is social media :lol:

Uh oh, the health secretary has no flipping idea what's waiting for him if he goes ahead with that idea...

My advice to him would be watch out for this (spoiler)

Spoiler

(edited 5 years ago)
Welcome to New China.


...except we have nowhere near the same resources, know-how, or motives that the Chinese government has and it will never happen
Why are the BBC twisting words ?

Matt Hancock didnt use the word ban and I don't see how it can be interpreted that way, he said we must legislate.
:jester:
Original post by NotNotBatman
Why are the BBC twisting words ?

Matt Hancock didnt use the word ban and I don't see how it can be interpreted that way, he said we must legislate.

When asked whether that legislation could include banning he said yes.
Original post by anosmianAcrimony
Welcome to New China.


...except we have nowhere near the same resources, know-how, or motives that the Chinese government has and it will never happen

They still haven't managed to implement that porn age restriction legislation which was supposed to be enforced in April last year.
The feeling behind this is right. Suicidal things shouldn't be exposed to young children and shouldn't be that easily accessible. It's how I learnt all the methods to kill myself when I was young too. Either social media is more strict about their content or they face the consequence of being banned. No one cares about the fact that people use these things to kill themselves but banning they might care about. We have our priorities right.
LMAO.
More empty threats from a government desperately trying to capture some short term political advantage.
Crime gangs using the dark web to sell class a narcotics, fake passports and military grade weapons.
But the politicians prefer to bluster threats over unpleasant photos/videos/comments on social media.
Original post by Decahedron
When asked whether that legislation could include banning he said yes.

Right, i just watched the video, i thought the articles were supposed to summarize it all. But I'm interpreting his words differently, he says parliament has that sanction. I still think its the conservatives not understanding the root of the problem as usual though.
Original post by NotNotBatman
Right, i just watched the video, i thought the articles were supposed to summarize it all. But I'm interpreting his words differently, he says parliament has that sanction. I still think its the conservatives not understanding the root of the problem as usual though.

Conservatives never understand, they just blame technology because they don't understand it. It is a much easier scapegoat than "we cut mental health services to the bone".
Original post by NotNotBatman
Why are the BBC twisting words ?

Matt Hancock didnt use the word ban and I don't see how it can be interpreted that way, he said we must legislate.

Because that is what it means, essentially. You "legislate" everything away that you don't like and voila, sheep like you can call it "legislation" instead of a ban.
A lot of facebook's content reports are reviewed by actual humans, so one could be forgiven if they're a bit slow on getting through their images of violence, suicide, abuse and other general nasty on the daily.

It's a bit of a shame that MPs don't bother to do any research on tech stuff before they go ham on arguing about it.
Reply 15
cyber bullying is a myth, its easy to dodge it yet people still go back for more? i guess people will do anything for attention nowadays. blaming social media is wrong.
He didn't use the word "ban". He said: "If we think they [social media companies] need to do things they are refusing to do, then we can and we must legislate."
Original post by eez
cyber bullying is a myth, its easy to dodge it yet people still go back for more? i guess people will do anything for attention nowadays. blaming social media is wrong.

I mean... no. There's very little to stop someone who harrases you irl from doing it over the internet as well once you get home. Once you get a gang of people doing that it's not as easy as "lmao just shut ur eyes, close the screen haha"
Reply 18
Original post by Retired_Messiah
I mean... no. There's very little to stop someone who harrases you irl from doing it over the internet as well once you get home. Once you get a gang of people doing that it's not as easy as "lmao just shut ur eyes, close the screen haha"

thats not what im saying. social media harassment is a myth. sure, it can happen in person too but if it's exclusively happening over the internet it takes 3/4 clicks to prevent it. people need to stop blaming social media, its harmless.
Original post by Notoriety
He didn't use the word "ban". He said: "If we think they [social media companies] need to do things they are refusing to do, then we can and we must legislate."

When asked by Marr if this legislation could include banning he said yes, watch the video.

Quick Reply

Latest

Trending

Trending