username4454836
Badges: 20
Rep:
?
#1
Report Thread starter 2 years ago
#1
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-47019912

"Social media firms could be banned if they fail to remove harmful content, the health secretary has warned. "

First it was encryption, now it is social media :lol:
1
reply
stoyfan
Badges: 20
Rep:
?
#2
Report 2 years ago
#2
(Original post by Decahedron)
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-47019912

"Social media firms could be banned if they fail to remove harmful content, the health secretary has warned. "

First it was encryption, now it is social media :lol:
It will go about as successfully as the proposed encryption ban.
0
reply
gjd800
Badges: 20
Rep:
?
#3
Report 2 years ago
#3
Hahaha
1
reply
username3973192
Badges: 20
Rep:
?
#4
Report 2 years ago
#4
(Original post by Decahedron)
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-47019912

"Social media firms could be banned if they fail to remove harmful content, the health secretary has warned. "

First it was encryption, now it is social media :lol:
Uh oh, the health secretary has no flipping idea what's waiting for him if he goes ahead with that idea...

My advice to him would be watch out for this (spoiler)

Spoiler:
Show
:mob::mob::mob::mob::mob::mob::mob::mob::mob::mob::mob::mob::mob::mob::mob::mob::mob::mob::mob::mob::mob::mob::mob::mob:
Last edited by username3973192; 2 years ago
1
reply
anosmianAcrimony
Badges: 20
Rep:
?
#5
Report 2 years ago
#5
Welcome to New China.


...except we have nowhere near the same resources, know-how, or motives that the Chinese government has and it will never happen
1
reply
NotNotBatman
Badges: 20
Rep:
?
#6
Report 2 years ago
#6
Why are the BBC twisting words ?

Matt Hancock didnt use the word ban and I don't see how it can be interpreted that way, he said we must legislate.
2
reply
username3973192
Badges: 20
Rep:
?
#7
Report 2 years ago
#7
(Original post by ltsmith)
MPs should be forced to take a course on computer literacy so they will stop spouting such ignorant rubbish
:jester:
0
reply
username4454836
Badges: 20
Rep:
?
#8
Report Thread starter 2 years ago
#8
(Original post by NotNotBatman)
Why are the BBC twisting words ?

Matt Hancock didnt use the word ban and I don't see how it can be interpreted that way, he said we must legislate.
When asked whether that legislation could include banning he said yes.
0
reply
username4454836
Badges: 20
Rep:
?
#9
Report Thread starter 2 years ago
#9
(Original post by anosmianAcrimony)
Welcome to New China.


...except we have nowhere near the same resources, know-how, or motives that the Chinese government has and it will never happen
They still haven't managed to implement that porn age restriction legislation which was supposed to be enforced in April last year.
0
reply
username1339858_
Badges: 14
Rep:
?
#10
Report 2 years ago
#10
The feeling behind this is right. Suicidal things shouldn't be exposed to young children and shouldn't be that easily accessible. It's how I learnt all the methods to kill myself when I was young too. Either social media is more strict about their content or they face the consequence of being banned. No one cares about the fact that people use these things to kill themselves but banning they might care about. We have our priorities right.
3
reply
londonmyst
Badges: 18
Rep:
?
#11
Report 2 years ago
#11
LMAO.
More empty threats from a government desperately trying to capture some short term political advantage.
Crime gangs using the dark web to sell class a narcotics, fake passports and military grade weapons.
But the politicians prefer to bluster threats over unpleasant photos/videos/comments on social media.
1
reply
NotNotBatman
Badges: 20
Rep:
?
#12
Report 2 years ago
#12
(Original post by Decahedron)
When asked whether that legislation could include banning he said yes.
Right, i just watched the video, i thought the articles were supposed to summarize it all. But I'm interpreting his words differently, he says parliament has that sanction. I still think its the conservatives not understanding the root of the problem as usual though.
0
reply
username4454836
Badges: 20
Rep:
?
#13
Report Thread starter 2 years ago
#13
(Original post by NotNotBatman)
Right, i just watched the video, i thought the articles were supposed to summarize it all. But I'm interpreting his words differently, he says parliament has that sanction. I still think its the conservatives not understanding the root of the problem as usual though.
Conservatives never understand, they just blame technology because they don't understand it. It is a much easier scapegoat than "we cut mental health services to the bone".
1
reply
yudothis
Badges: 20
Rep:
?
#14
Report 2 years ago
#14
(Original post by NotNotBatman)
Why are the BBC twisting words ?

Matt Hancock didnt use the word ban and I don't see how it can be interpreted that way, he said we must legislate.
Because that is what it means, essentially. You "legislate" everything away that you don't like and voila, sheep like you can call it "legislation" instead of a ban.
0
reply
Retired_Messiah
Badges: 21
Rep:
?
#15
Report 2 years ago
#15
A lot of facebook's content reports are reviewed by actual humans, so one could be forgiven if they're a bit slow on getting through their images of violence, suicide, abuse and other general nasty on the daily.

It's a bit of a shame that MPs don't bother to do any research on tech stuff before they go ham on arguing about it.
1
reply
eez
Badges: 14
Rep:
?
#16
Report 2 years ago
#16
cyber bullying is a myth, its easy to dodge it yet people still go back for more? i guess people will do anything for attention nowadays. blaming social media is wrong.
0
reply
Notoriety
Badges: 22
Rep:
?
#17
Report 2 years ago
#17
He didn't use the word "ban". He said: "If we think they [social media companies] need to do things they are refusing to do, then we can and we must legislate."
0
reply
Retired_Messiah
Badges: 21
Rep:
?
#18
Report 2 years ago
#18
(Original post by eez)
cyber bullying is a myth, its easy to dodge it yet people still go back for more? i guess people will do anything for attention nowadays. blaming social media is wrong.
I mean... no. There's very little to stop someone who harrases you irl from doing it over the internet as well once you get home. Once you get a gang of people doing that it's not as easy as "lmao just shut ur eyes, close the screen haha"
1
reply
eez
Badges: 14
Rep:
?
#19
Report 2 years ago
#19
(Original post by Retired_Messiah)
I mean... no. There's very little to stop someone who harrases you irl from doing it over the internet as well once you get home. Once you get a gang of people doing that it's not as easy as "lmao just shut ur eyes, close the screen haha"
thats not what im saying. social media harassment is a myth. sure, it can happen in person too but if it's exclusively happening over the internet it takes 3/4 clicks to prevent it. people need to stop blaming social media, its harmless.
0
reply
username4454836
Badges: 20
Rep:
?
#20
Report Thread starter 2 years ago
#20
(Original post by Notoriety)
He didn't use the word "ban". He said: "If we think they [social media companies] need to do things they are refusing to do, then we can and we must legislate."
When asked by Marr if this legislation could include banning he said yes, watch the video.
0
reply
X

Quick Reply

Attached files
Write a reply...
Reply
new posts
Back
to top
Latest
My Feed

See more of what you like on
The Student Room

You can personalise what you see on TSR. Tell us a little about yourself to get started.

Personalise

Are you tempted to change your firm university choice on A-level results day?

Yes, I'll try and go to a uni higher up the league tables (14)
25%
Yes, there is a uni that I prefer and I'll fit in better (4)
7.14%
No I am happy with my choice (35)
62.5%
I'm using Clearing when I have my exam results (3)
5.36%

Watched Threads

View All