Shamima Begums son, a death that brittish government could have prevented

You can post it as many times as you like...
It proves nothing. Why would a vulnerable 19 year old girl give up her only son. After loosing two other children? Especially considering ifs he went to the U.K. she wouldn’t be able to see him. I think you can’t possibly understand the love and protection that a mother has for her child, regardless of the situation.
If the Home Secretary had any understanding of compassion he wouldn’t try to break up a mother from her son. But his wish has been commanded now, only that child has lost his life as a direct consequence of the governments actions.

Already a thread made on this topic.

Point about love and protection pretty moot in this case since if she actually loved her child and wanted to protect it would try and get it out of a war zone rather than holding onto it whilst trying herself.

If the reports are true that Shamima Begums son has died. Then that is a death that the brittish government could have prevented. She wanted to return to this country because she was worried about the health of her son. But the Home Secretary revoked her citizenship and stopped her returning. Therefore he is partially responsible for the unfortunate death of her child.

I feel sorry for the child too. But I think you have an incorrect understanding of how easy it would have been for Shamima Begum to get out of the regime after joining. It’s not something you can just quit. She would have known too much even if she wanted out. But I suspect that she was too radicalised to even think of leaving.

You can post it as many times as you like...
It proves nothing. Why would a vulnerable 19 year old girl give up her only son. After loosing two other children? Especially considering ifs he went to the U.K. she wouldn’t be able to see him. I think you can’t possibly understand the love and protection that a mother has for her child, regardless of the situation.
If the Home Secretary had any understanding of compassion he wouldn’t try to break up a mother from her son. But his wish has been commanded now, only that child has lost his life as a direct consequence of the governments actions.

Making a point is worthless without justification. I hope those of you who were all for the revoking of her citizenship, take a long hard look at yourself. You didn’t think about her child that was as much a part of the situation as she was.

Shouldn’t have joined in the first place, still all on her.

Also don’t see how this has to do with my other post because her child was born after she was out of their territory.

She's also the one who says she doesn't regret joining ISIS. She's also the one who tells the media she thinks the Ariana Grande attack could be justified. The British government didn't trick her into saying these things. If she had behaved more like the US ISIS woman, then perhaps one could actually make the argument that she wanted to leave but couldn't, but there's no evidence to suggest that she actually wanted to leave until now.

Let's not act like she wanted to leave ISIS until it's clearly too late for her to do so. No airline would fly a 9-month pregnant woman, and it would've taken extra time to retrieve anyone, let alone a newborn and a new mother, from Syria.

She also never made a formal request for consular assistance (which is not available in Syria to begin with).

To expect the baby to survive (if he has indeed died after only 3 weeks) is asking for both a miracle and very privileged treatment for someone who's in reality a criminal and an unapologetic terrorist.

Why was I quoted?

Just wanted to add to your points.

Oh ok, 2nd point was more me going against the pointless “read above comment that has nothing to do with your post” response from her.

You can post it as many times as you like...
It proves nothing. Why would a vulnerable 19 year old girl give up her only son. After loosing two other children? Especially considering ifs he went to the U.K. she wouldn’t be able to see him. I think you can’t possibly understand the love and protection that a mother has for her child, regardless of the situation.
If the Home Secretary had any understanding of compassion he wouldn’t try to break up a mother from her son. But his wish has been commanded now, only that child has lost his life as a direct consequence of the governments actions.

Why do you care so much about this one Bangladeshi terrorist? I assume you are a white British girl, surely you must realise there are far more worthy candidates of your compassion and empathy of our ethnicity within our own country? Why the fetishisation of this outsider who has made it very clear that she regards herself an outsider and shares no real kinship you or I?

Yes, her child dying is tragic, of course it is, but thousands of children across the world die in similar or even worse circumstances every single day, what makes this event so significant?

You can post it as many times as you like...
It proves nothing. Why would a vulnerable 19 year old girl give up her only son. After loosing two other children? Especially considering ifs he went to the U.K. she wouldn’t be able to see him. I think you can’t possibly understand the love and protection that a mother has for her child, regardless of the situation.
If the Home Secretary had any understanding of compassion he wouldn’t try to break up a mother from her son. But his wish has been commanded now, only that child has lost his life as a direct consequence of the governments actions.

more ....

https://www.cnsnews.com/news/article/michael-w-chapman/british-mp-isis-genocide-2-year-old-boy-was-killed-ground-meat-and