What does everyone want from Brexit ? You have 4 options

Wow what an unbelievably biased presentation of "options" lmao

I think a career at the Daily Mail is awaiting...or looming :x

How are the options biast?

@Nalk1573

The descriptions create bias, only the bold needed to be said.

1) no deal - not that bad. some good things, some bad. it's risky but it could work.

2) may's deal - everyone voted against it in parliament, so therefore it won't happen. it wasn't that good anyway.

3) cancel brexit - this will cause riots, and the last 2 years would have been wasted. in all that time you could have learnt a new language, started a business etc.

4) a second referendum - this will cause even more aggression, violence, arguing and hostility in society.

So am I right in understanding that UKIP never had a plan for leaving the EU? Despite the fact that this is the type of thing they were campaigning for, for years?

Why would they, they were never likely to form a government.

I WANT Brexit cancelled, But in fairness i'd need to go with a 2nd ref, at this point I feel the determination not to is the exact reason it should be done. I don't care much if people moan at having to vote again, they can spare 30 mins if they're so sure. It isn't like what we're doing now is working.

So, because they were never likely to form a government they never bothered putting the work in? I get it, they considered it as being pointless... But still, wouldn't it have painted them in a good light? That they believe in the idea? That it's possible? That they're not just a bunch of lazy self entitled white dudes? That they have some knowledge of how Political, Social and Economic systems work? That they weren't just a joke? That they were capable?

Am I reading into this too much?

I cannot support a No Deal Brexit due to the socio-economic evidence released which clearly states the deep ramifications about trading on WTO rules and quite frankly, I don't think the government has a sensible contingency plan in place just in case we leave without a deal and businesses aren't sufficiently prepared for a No Deal Brexit. I also cannot support Theresa May's botched Brexit deal as there are many flaws in her deal and I would personally advocate for a soft Brexit (Norway-style Brexit) as it has the least socio-economic consequences and it would solve the problem with the Irish backstop, an issue that has been causing anxiety and uncertainty between the Republic of Ireland and Northern Ireland due to concerns about the Good Friday Agreement falling apart. As much as I would like to cancel Brexit, I believe that the sensible thing to do is to bring this back to the people through a People's Vote/Second Referendum and let the people vote on what should happen next through three options: Theresa May's Deal, No Deal or Cancel Brexit through revoking Article 50.

1) no deal - not that bad. some good things, some bad. it's risky but it could work.

2) may's deal - everyone voted against it in parliament, so therefore it won't happen. it wasn't that good anyway.

3) cancel brexit - this will cause riots, and the last 2 years would have been wasted. in all that time you could have learnt a new language, started a business etc.

4) a second referendum - this will cause even more aggression, violence, arguing and hostility in society.