Original post by That'sGreatThere is no negative factor in my life, I'm just intelligent enough and interested enough to understand and watch/read the news and current affairs.
The negative comments are all from people like yourself, who struggle to separate facts from emotions and are hence too fragile to even be on a debate thread. You'll also notice a pattern, which shows the majority of those people leaving negative comments struggle to form simple sentences or formulate their own opinion, and can't seem to realise when they've been proven to look foolish. Fools tend to lash out quite a lot and get personal upon realising they've lost the debate, coincidentally something you've done. However, my followers far outweigh the negative comments, so it's a pretty moot point.
I'm not anti-semitic, never have been never will be, not sure what gave you that impression. Though maybe you just misread a comment or didn't understand something, which is highly likely.
Again, you've struggled to read read even 3 sentences correctly without letting your clear anger overshadow your ability to argue. I never said homosexuals were forbidden. I find your lack of comprehension ability pretty amusing.
In terms of holy wars, I'm not sure why you think I don't know about these? As your other friend, the one who doesn't present himself as an utter moron, mentioned: the Qu'ran only support fighting when someone else is fighting them. As we have already established, you're probably a bit simple minded for current affairs debates, but the West has been fighting in the Middle East for years now, which constitutes as fighting. Hence, ISIS is a retaliation to that, and so they are, in fact, reading the Qu'ran literally.
I don't think you know what quotation marks are used for, but I'l tell you now that they are used to quote things. Considering I never even mentioned the words 'incite violence' I'm not sure what reason you included them for. Unless you were referring to me saying 'advocated violence', which as you have already stated, is allowed 'for the safety of the individual'
Come back when you've figured out what you're arguing and how you're going to argue it. Like with the many who have posted on my wall, I will happily show you up as a fool... and likely get a couple followers out of it as well.
Ah yes, I'm not surprised you resonated well with that one, you seem to be in the same ballpark IQ wise. For a bit of background information, that was the guy who got in 6 different arguments on the same thread, all of which saw the other people calling him out for his idiocy, misspelt the word 'friends' in his username and claimed that not being attracted to a black girl (not all black girls, just a specific black girl) made you a racist xenophobe.
In terms of a couple of the rest of the people who posted on my wall
One of them was someone who had dropped out of two different universities, including the Open University, after taking 6 years to get through half of a bachelors degree because it was 'too difficult', got called out for being lazy and idiotic by, approximately, 8 different people on her thread, and struggles to use logic or form coherent sentences.
One of them called me a legend... oh hang on that's a good one, that doesn't help your case
One of them... oh that's it. Right. It's clear you've aligned yourself with a very particular demographic, I pity your parents for having to put so much time and money into raising you.