I'm sorry but where have I said that porn should be the way children learn about sex? All I've said is that it's a common way children first encounter sex. I also put real in ''s because you're right, it's not real. I first got sex ed in year 5, you know, very basic stuff. I already knew what sex was at that time. That wasn't what made me start looking up sexual material though. I first started looking at soft porn, like nude pictures of women when I was 11, completely independent of anyone else. It's like a biological clock had started ticking, which is exactly what happens. Children know when they become sexually mature and they will find sexually explicit material when they are ready. In my case, porn didn't teach me anything about sex; it was a side desire for sexually explicit material, which again is what happens when you reach puberty.
In this country at least, sex ed happens earlier than when children start seeking sexually explicit material. So they already know what sex is, but that's got nothing to do with it. What I'm saying is that every child has a biological clock that will start ticking at a specific time, and when it does, they start seeking sexual material. Almost every person in this country who has gone through puberty has sought after sexually explicit material and found it eventually. Pretty much everyone I know has been viewing porn since the ages of 12 or 13, and yet none of us are sexually deviant perverts. Claiming porn is dangerous to children is absolutely unfounded.
Honestly, I think it's naive to believe this is an honest action, especially with the other things the government and other governments have been doing recently. It will lead to more blockages unless the leftservatives are moved out of parliament. This isn't about protecting children, this is purely political.