Woman burnt to death at Islamic school after sexual assault

criticism should be welcomed in Islam, like debating about islam and what you say about justification about slavery should be debated so we can show you can that you are wrong or just correct you. But there is a line between insulting and criticising.
Like insulting is saying, your mum is fat.
Criticising is saying your mum is affecting her health with her weight don't you think?

so the toxicity is not with Islam, it's with the specific people. If both people believe in Islam, but one is toxic and the other is not. I'm pretty sure Islam is not the factor that differs them from each other.

It's insulting to say you are stupid.Its not insulting to say your beliefs are stupid.A lot of intelligent people can still believe really stupid things.Take Issac Newton for instance.A genius who redefined physics yet he believed that there were codes hidden in the bible.

so the toxicity is not with Islam, it's with the specific people. If both people believe in Islam, but one is toxic and the other is not. I'm pretty sure Islam is not the factor that differs them from each other.

I mean that when you were trying to look clever by using whom, which you're clearly not comfortable with, you messed it up. Giving the preposition "to" twice. Felt bad, man.

And good one.

Is the best retort you have that of my having a typo on my phone? Oh that is sweet 😂 Not to mention you think using the word ‘whom’ is somehow clever as opposed to a word anyone who speaks English should know.

Nah, I dished on your using spurious and collective as well. I didn't even mention the pluralising apostrophes, which again should be obvious to any native speaker of English. A lot of typos.

Perhaps stop trying so hard.

Oh this is quite touching that the best you can do is accuse me of grammatical errors 😂. Although given your style and quality of English I’m not sure you’re in a position to talk.
Did you just call me a foreigner?😂

Is the best retort you have that of my having a typo on my phone? Oh that is sweet 😂 Not to mention you think using the word ‘whom’ is somehow clever as opposed to a word anyone who speaks English should know.

Oh this is quite touching that the best you can do is accuse me of grammatical errors 😂. Although given your style and quality of English I’m not sure you’re in a position to talk.
Did you just call me a foreigner?😂

I was accusing you of trying to look clever. Which is obviously the case, given you didn't respond to my point at all and simply came up with some quip about British people being intolerant.

the desperate strawman arguments continue, he criticised your grammar, so he called you a foreigner?

apart from your desperate strawman arguments:

The mainstream view is that the Quran accepts the institution of slavery. The word 'abd' (slave) is rarely used, being more commonly replaced by some periphrasis such as ma malakat aymanukum ("that which your right hands own").

[Quran 4:36], [Quran 9:60], [Quran 24:58] - It does urge kindness towards slaves

[Quran 16:71] - The Quran accepts the distinction between slave and free as part of the natural order and uses this distinction as an example of God's grace

It does address their need for humanity ([Quran 2:221], [Quran 4:25]

And indeed before freeing them, your 'prophet' also owned slaves - The most notable of Muhammad's slaves were: Safiyya bint Huyayy, whom he freed and married; Maria al-Qibtiyya, given to Muhammad by a Sassanid official, whom he freed and who may have become his wife; Sirin, Maria's sister, whom he freed and married to the poet Hassan ibn Thabit and Zayd ibn Harithah, whom Muhammad freed and adopted as a son.

In Islamic jurisprudence :A Muslim slaveholder was entitled by law to the sexual enjoyment of his slave women. While free women might own male slaves, they had no such right.

The property of a slave was owned by his or her master unless a contract of freedom of the slave had been entered into, which allowed the slave to earn money to purchase his or her freedom and similarly to pay bride wealth. The marriage of slaves required the consent of the owner.

No it means one person takes it less seriously than the other.

No, no, the toxicity is primarily with Islam. Some Muslims are toxic, some aren't. But the point was that I can call Islam toxic and that does not automatically mean I am calling all Muslims toxic, as Napp was fallaciously suggesting.

That's the thing you aint explaining the logic behind your argument. Logically if someone believes in a toxic religion, he is toxic himself.

I find this hard to believe and inaccurate. Where’s the proof? If it happened the papers would plaster it all over . Your statement Pakistanis of Muslim decent shows you have no understanding of that ur talking about. You should spread your racial hate elsewhere

I'm still waiting for that list bro...

Some of them are raised in the UK, but that’s besides the point I was making. And someone who is from Bangladesh is known as a Bengali.

I believe it’s more to do with the level of corruption than simply just the culture or religion.

But that's simply not true. For someone to be toxic, they have to be spouting and doing toxic things. If they act nicely and courteously towards everyone then you can't possibly call them a toxic person. They may have toxic beliefs, but they wouldn't be acting in a toxic fashion.

Someone already gave the example of Isaac Newton. He believed some truly idiotic things (secret codes in Bible), but that didn't make him a stupid person. He was obviously extremely intelligent.