The Student Room Group

UK to introduce porn age-checks in July

Scroll to see replies

Original post by -Eirlys-
Yeah I was going to say the same thing about younger people being more and more tech savvy!
I was watching a TV show last night, I think it's called 'let's talk about sex' or something and they were showing all of the old and sometimes modern sex education videos. They all noticed how they only talk about puberty and the purpose of sex being to have a child. Some didn't talk about contraception or the female orgasm or even expressed that sex can be done just for fun and to enjoy the intimacy between two people. They all seemed scared to even show real looking people, resorting to aliens and other non-human characters. Are we all really that ashamed and embarrassed about sex?! Nearly all of them had a negative view on sex, some outright shaming people for having sex. How about they make a sex education video that isn't cringe-worthy, that is real, that shows real, consensual, enjoyable sex and talks about every aspect but in a positive light? There is so much that sex ed leaves out that it's no wonder that young kids look elsewhere for information! They'll find out themselves or another way so why not just say it in sex ed? They should be investing in better sex ed, not further limitations on porn. It seems totally backwards in this day and age. Maybe when the next generation become politicians and policy makers, replacing the uptight, misinformed, close minded generation, things will improve.

Putting condoms on cucumbers and watching videos from the 90s in 2009 was my reminder of sex education at school. Yes it just focused on sex making babies even though it's a fun activity. Contraception was taught in my school briefly but in the sense that a condom will often stop pregnancy if used correctly. The whole topic of the female orgasm was definitely ignored in sex education, so was the male climax for that matter. Yep they used cartoon characters. I definitely looked towards porn for actual education on sex because before then I was like okay so the penis goes into the vagina but then what? What else happens around that, what else is involved? I mean I want to be a policy maker a few years down the line but hopefully the next generation of policy makers and politicians are more open minded not only on this but all other issues about society. (Work in progress) :hello: :biggrin:
Like I've said many times, everyone I know started watching at 12-13 years old, and none of us are addicted perverts or have unrealistic expectations. This 'it teaches children to have unrealistic expectations' is a myth for the most part. Of course bad things happen relating to porn usage but so does pretty much everything else; things like sugar cause 100x more problems than porn for children, yet the government isn't looking to ban it for under-18s. Yes it's a good idea in theory but when you look at it, it becomes obvious how incompetent and malicious it is.
Original post by kimkywep
i mean i still think porn is bad for your brain ive not touched the stuff it creates such a jarred perception of relationships and what men and women really look like. i think its especially bad for young children if they get in the habit of it
And did she look at it, or close it immediately? If the latter then that proves my point about children only looking at it when they're ready. And if you were that concerned then you should have set up a firewall to block the sites they were coming from, or even simpler, installing an adblocker. I'm more concerned about what websites she was going on to get those popups, as sites normal 8 year olds go on do not have sexually explicit ads. The problem might not have been from the ads themselves.

And plus, this porn ban won't do anything to stop cases like these. Those popups to 'sign up and *** in 5 minutes' or whatever would still be legally allowed to happen. That's more a problem of ads in general that won't be fixed by restricting pornographic websites.
Original post by ANM775
When my Sister was 8 I would sometimes find evidence of porn in her browsing history.
from the URL's it looked like popups

My sister lead a very sheltered life and I do not believe at 8 yrs old she went out looking for porn [She probably wouldn't have even known what it was]

You don't have to be looking for porn to have it forced upon you
Original post by Cryoraptor
And did she look at it, or close it immediately? If the latter then that proves my point about children only looking at it when they're ready. And if you were that concerned then you should have set up a firewall to block the sites they were coming from, or even simpler, installing an adblocker. I'm more concerned about what websites she was going on to get those popups, as sites normal 8 year olds go on do not have sexually explicit ads. The problem might not have been from the ads themselves.

And plus, this porn ban won't do anything to stop cases like these. Those popups to 'sign up and *** in 5 minutes' or whatever would still be legally allowed to happen. That's more a problem of ads in general that won't be fixed by restricting pornographic websites.




No idea what she looked at or if she closed it immediately. At that point in time I was officially banned from using the family PC [had my username deleted] and was still living at my parents house and had no PC or laptop or internet ready device. I had made an exploit floppy disk and decrypted all their passwords and had them revealed to me and was using my sisters login to get on the internet when everybody was out. Whilst clearing up evidence of my own internet usage I noticed that she had been exposed to porn on occasions.

I thought about telling my parents but in doing so would have completely given myself away and surely faced some kind of large punishment for hacking away their passwords not to mentioned they would have prevented me from using the internet again [probably start locking that room or something]

This was a long time ago and I can't remember what websites she was visiting but the porn sites in the history were always obscure looking with urls don't look like the type you'd find if you were simply googling pornographic words and i found no evidence of google or search engine searches for such words either [and i don't believe an 8 year old would be deleting their google history]
Which ironically isn't affected by this law and isn't being demonitised by facebook or youtube.
Reply 145
I don't know, i'm sure the poodles in Westminster would be able to make it pretty air tight if they ask their bankers in Beijing for a hand in it.
It seems now is the time to start a VPN company, wish I had the knowhow
mocked it
Original post by Andrew97
Isn’t the idea to stop children stumbling upon it? You don’t exactly stumble onto a porn site do you? Whereas you can easily do that on Twitter ,for example if you type in 3 perfectly innocent letters when looking for the news.


I don't remember ever accidently stumbling upon any porn on the internet when I was young, and I grew up in the 'wild west' days of the internet when it was pretty unregulated. And is it really that big of a deal if a child accidently sees some porn? I remember me and my friends finding discarded porn magazines whilst out playing in the woods ocassionally. It was hardly traumatizing or life scarring.

This just strikes me as another case of the government fixing a problem that doesn't really exist, all so they can pat themselves on the back and say, "hey look at us, aren't we doing such a great job".
(edited 5 years ago)
Okay, that all makes sense. I'm just curious about what sites she was visiting to get those popups. If they were few and far between and obscure then she was probably closing them as soon as they opened. I don't think an 8 year old would be looking for porn either so I think it's more an issue of what dodgy sites she was going on to get those ads. Like I've said many times now, most sites won't give you pornographic popups, especially ones that 8 year olds visit.
Original post by ANM775
No idea what she looked at or if she closed it immediately. At that point in time I was officially banned from using the family PC [had my username deleted] and was still living at my parents house and had no PC or laptop or internet ready device. I had made an exploit floppy disk and decrypted all their passwords and had them revealed to me and was using my sisters login to get on the internet when everybody was out. Whilst clearing up evidence of my own internet usage I noticed that she had been exposed to porn on occasions.

I thought about telling my parents but in doing so would have completely given myself away and surely faced some kind of large punishment for hacking away their passwords not to mentioned they would have prevented me from using the internet again [probably start locking that room or something]

This was a long time ago and I can't remember what websites she was visiting but the porn sites in the history were always obscure looking with urls don't look like the type you'd find if you were simply googling pornographic words and i found no evidence of google or search engine searches for such words either [and i don't believe an 8 year old would be deleting their google history]
Also, I forgot to mention that when I was in the 8-10 age range, the worst things I got were things like dating site ads, but I think by that age, every child that ever used the internet has come across at least one ad like that. I think the first legitimately pornographic ads I got was when I was 11, but they all came from explicit sites anyway i.e. I was looking for them.
Original post by Cryoraptor
Like I've said many times, everyone I know started watching at 12-13 years old, and none of us are addicted perverts or have unrealistic expectations. This 'it teaches children to have unrealistic expectations' is a myth for the most part. Of course bad things happen relating to porn usage but so does pretty much everything else; things like sugar cause 100x more problems than porn for children, yet the government isn't looking to ban it for under-18s. Yes it's a good idea in theory but when you look at it, it becomes obvious how incompetent and malicious it is.

Do you really know enough about all your friends personal lives to make conclusions about their addictions and expectations?
Also 'teaching children unrealistic expectations is mostly a myth' says who? Or is this just an assumption.
Original post by ollie1520
Do you really know enough about all your friends personal lives to make conclusions about their addictions and expectations?
Also 'unrealistic expectations is mostly a myth' but says who?


Tbf I will add to your point some people have kinks ‘weirder’ than ordinary porn.
tbf instilling porn addiction from a young age is less than ideal but this is a bit of an unwieldy legislative tool to use seeing as it deters literally everybody whilst also doing nothing to stop teenagers who are determined to watch it anyway.

I'll probably use it as an excuse to go cold turkey for a bit, feel as though I use it a little bit too often.
Original post by Retired_Messiah
tbf instilling porn addiction from a young age is less than ideal but this is a bit of an unwieldy legislative tool to use seeing as it deters literally everybody whilst also doing nothing to stop teenagers who are determined to watch it anyway.

I'll probably use it as an excuse to go cold turkey for a bit, feel as though I use it a little bit too often.


i think the gov are well aware teenager are going to get around it no matter what they do. seems like this is not about stopping a 17 year old watching it but more of a 8 year old watching it. i.e. a child who doesn't understand how a VPN or other similar ways work
But you just don't stumble across porn sites... you search for them. Everyone who is able to search for a porn site would also be able to read threads like this which tell them to get a vpn, They can get a really janky one from Google play store and Boom they can now access porn.

But where do you actually stumble across porn? Places like twitter,reddit, google (Google searches for a character may bring up rule 34, these images may not be hosted on a porn site), This government action will not stop this.
Original post by ollie1520
i think the gov are well aware teenager are going to get around it no matter what they do. seems like this is not about stopping a 17 year old watching it but more of a 8 year old watching it. i.e. a child who doesn't understand how a VPN or other similar ways work
Original post by therandomperson
But you just don't stumble across porn sites... you search for them. Everyone who is able to search for a porn site would also be able to read threads like this which tell them to get a vpn, They can get a really janky one from Google play store and Boom they can now access porn.

But where do you actually stumble across porn? Places like twitter,reddit, google (Google searches for a character may bring up rule 34, these images may not be hosted on a porn site), This government action will not stop this.


I think that most kids are finding porn by typing sex into google image search and results returned are an infinite and unrestricted amount of hardcore porn with links available. Majority of adults would agree it shouldn't be that easy. Typing sex into google doesn't mean you could also understand how getting around blocks work.
(edited 5 years ago)
lets swap our porn using peer to peer method

who wants to swap theirs with mine?
Actually, yes I do. I'm sorry if you're too immature/embarrassed to talk about sexual topics with your friends.

Says who? Says me, judging by the fact that sexual relationships have not only not decreased in quality and openness, but actually greatly increased since the inception of internet porn. Considering at least 95% of males under the age of 30 have watched porn at some point, clearly it's not causing problems in that area.
Original post by ollie1520
Do you really know enough about all your friends personal lives to make conclusions about their addictions and expectations?
Also 'teaching children unrealistic expectations is mostly a myth' says who? Or is this just an assumption.
And you just said I was making assumptions. Out of curiosity, I typed 'sex' into google, and no 'hardcore' porn came up straight away. It took a fair amount of searching. In fact, the Wikipedia page on Sexual Intercourse is one of the first things that came up, which you could argue is one of the safest things a child could find on the topic.


Original post by ollie1520
I think that most kids are finding porn by typing sex into google image search and results returned are an infinite and unrestricted amount of hardcore porn with links available. Majority of adults would agree it shouldn't be that easy. Typing sex into google doesn't mean you could also understand how getting around blocks work.

Quick Reply

Latest

Trending

Trending