The Student Room Group

Scroll to see replies

Reply 1
Great news, it will annoy a lot of idiots and stupid people out there. Sorry, thinking aloud.
(edited 5 years ago)
Note to self
sell Tesla shares buy into pussy hats and smelling salts.
can the queen actually kill him with a sword or was that just some internet bs
Reply 4
As soon as the news broke, the Trumpophobe machine kicked into action. The BBC immediately proceeded to declare the visit 'controversial' and informed the nation that there would be 'angry crowds' in the streets, as they rushed around to find every anti-Trump's dogsbody and spokesman and thrust them in front of a mike. Obviously, that is not the role the State broadcaster is expected to adopt by right-thinking people but their inside knowledge of the anti-Trump derangement is empirical and they simply don't care about any sense of propriety anymore than the average lefty. It will be tumbleweed in the corridors at Broadcasting House on the day.
Reply 5
Original post by z-hog
As soon as the news broke, the Trumpophobe machine kicked into action. The BBC immediately proceeded to declare the visit 'controversial' and informed the nation that there would be 'angry crowds' in the streets, as they rushed around to find every anti-Trump's dogsbody and spokesman and thrust them in front of a mike. Obviously, that is not the role the State broadcaster is expected to adopt by right-thinking people but their inside knowledge of the anti-Trump derangement is empirical and they simply don't care about any sense of propriety anymore than the average lefty. It will be tumbleweed in the corridors at Broadcasting House on the day.

The BBC is not a state broadcaster.


Oh God.

Let's get the blimp ready
(edited 5 years ago)
Original post by Glaz
can the queen actually kill him with a sword or was that just some internet bs

:hahaha:

Where did you hear that?
Original post by thestudent33
:hahaha:

Where did you hear that?

idefk lmfao i think just the internet, instagram most probably, but it could just be endless s***posting lmao
Original post by Glaz
idefk lmfao i think just the internet, instagram most probably, but it could just be endless s***posting lmao


Yeah probably
Original post by z-hog
As soon as the news broke, the Trumpophobe machine kicked into action. The BBC immediately proceeded to declare the visit 'controversial' and informed the nation that there would be 'angry crowds' in the streets, as they rushed around to find every anti-Trump's dogsbody and spokesman and thrust them in front of a mike. Obviously, that is not the role the State broadcaster is expected to adopt by right-thinking people but their inside knowledge of the anti-Trump derangement is empirical and they simply don't care about any sense of propriety anymore than the average lefty. It will be tumbleweed in the corridors at Broadcasting House on the day.


And here we observe an old man yelling at a cloud.
Couldn't care less
:yawn:
Reply 13
Original post by Trotsky's Iceaxe
And here we observe an old man yelling at a cloud.

What a stupid thing to say, typical Trumpophobe. Get this, he may be whatever you like but he looks much better than his brainless enemies.
Original post by z-hog
As soon as the news broke, the Trumpophobe machine kicked into action. The BBC immediately proceeded to declare the visit 'controversial' and informed the nation that there would be 'angry crowds' in the streets, as they rushed around to find every anti-Trump's dogsbody and spokesman and thrust them in front of a mike. Obviously, that is not the role the State broadcaster is expected to adopt by right-thinking people but their inside knowledge of the anti-Trump derangement is empirical and they simply don't care about any sense of propriety anymore than the average lefty. It will be tumbleweed in the corridors at Broadcasting House on the day.


Serious question, what editorial line exactly do you think the BBC should take? Should it be representative of British public opinion? Should it be objective and based on fact and expertise? Should it always be "balanced"? These are all very different standards and not all of them can be met.
Original post by z-hog
What a stupid thing to say, typical Trumpophobe. Get this, he may be whatever you like but he looks much better than his brainless enemies.

Yes it's really his enemies who are brainless isn't it? Trump makes George Bush Jr look like Stephen hawking.
It should have happened years ago. Whether we like Donald trump or not he is the head of state of one of our closest allies.
Original post by limetang
It should have happened years ago. Whether we like Donald trump or not he is the head of state of one of our closest allies.


I think Britain should distance themselves from America, especially following Trump's retweeting of Britain first tweets. We should show that we have some backbone and not just follow America just to stay on their good side. I don't think this would ever happen under a Tory government or a new labour one but hey one can hope
Reply 18
Original post by anarchism101
Serious question, what editorial line exactly do you think the BBC should take? Should it be representative of British public opinion? Should it be objective and based on fact and expertise? Should it always be "balanced"? These are all very different standards and not all of them can be met.

Good question, what editorial line do I think the BBC should take when reporting Trump's visit? As with everything else they report, I'd like them to report facts without expressing a political leaning of any sort on anything. They are funded by everyone, both people who find the visit 'controversial' and those who think there is absolutely nothing controversial about it. For that reason, they are not meant to have opinions. The Guardian and the Mail can, the BBC can't by charter. They are not supposed to have a view on Austerity, for instance. They do.

It's easy to be objective and factual in reporting Trump's visit, he has been invited by the democratically elected government of this country in his capacity as POTUS and will be landing on whatever the date is. This country is hosting a democratically elected foreign dignitary, the US are an historical benefactor and a vital strategic partner. Where's the controversy, some people don't like the idea. So what, who cares?

For the BBC to be 'balanced', they shouldn't go too heavy on the sauce. It is balanced to acknowledge all the anti-Trump coalitions and give them a voice but the picture is exactly the same as with ER. There is an imbalance, when I say 'they create the narrative', that is based on the disproportionate amount of airtime they apportion to those movements by banging on the drum all day long at every hour that 'Trump's visit is controversial'. Radio 4 is where it's all at, all their flagship programmes making it the editorial line that 'Trump's visit is controversial'. Matter not of fact but opinion.
During his 3-day trip, fake tan sales are predicted to increase by 600%.

Quick Reply

Latest

Trending

Trending