The Student Room Group

Higher Maths 2018-19

Scroll to see replies

Reply 80
Original post by A1renegade
My teacher said it couldn't be factorised any further so it should be right. I don't see where the 5 marks come from though


at least i know i got something right. i was staring at that question for so long because i thought i had done it wrong.
Anyone got a copy of the paper so I can do the answers please
Reply 82
5 marks was way too many for that question.
15568014675352287822914492568931.jpg15568015029818897498350753873463.jpg15568015201143604693076432312149.jpg15568015423025748525337213391765.jpg15568015647494082273234245544585.jpg1556801580715599544995044667945.jpg15568015996466810498129275446617.jpg15568016142893735472494146923384.jpg
Reply 85
There it is^
Original post by posterpreviouslyknownascoss:D
Anyone got a copy of the paper so I can do the answers please


Original post by Dzyuba
You're welcome :smile:
Thank you - will get to it today

Original post by Dzyuba
There it is^
Original post by amnai
im seeing a trend, first bio now maths. they've mase the exams this year really difficult. one can only imagine what physics is going to be like.


same with the modern :/ was an odd paper
So it says to "show all working", see if I just wrote the midpoint without writing the starting equation (M=(X2-X1/2 etc...) - would I still get the mark?
Original post by nat5dawg
So it says to "show all working", see if I just wrote the midpoint without writing the starting equation (M=(X2-X1/2 etc...) - would I still get the mark?


I did this too, never actually thought to show my working completely for just finding a midpoint. Hopefully we’ll still get that mark
Original post by ailsa.02
I did this too, never actually thought to show my working completely for just finding a midpoint. Hopefully we’ll still get that mark


Nice! Yeah, all the past papers I've seen give the mark for just stating the midpoint - so that's why I did it. But then I got home and seen show all working in bold on the front of the question sheet. Hopefully we do get it
Not a good maths exam :frown: Really made unfair when you compare the standard of this exam compared to the last 3 ones ... Not even the specimen paper for this year is representative of the level of difficulty in this one lol.
Original post by amnai
at least i know i got something right. i was staring at that question for so long because i thought i had done it wrong.


Yeah, I put it into photomath and it came out with (x+3)(x-1)(3x^2+4x+2) which is what I put. Should only have been worth 3 marks, 4 at a push.
Thought the papers went well, I’m just uncertain of the question in paper two asking about the domain - what did people put for that? I just repeated the domain from above?
Reply 94
Original post by WestDragon
Thought the papers went well, I’m just uncertain of the question in paper two asking about the domain - what did people put for that? I just repeated the domain from above?

I wasn't sure about that one, but I put -1000 x -1, but I have no clue if that's right.
Well I needed a B but that’s that gone hahaha don’t even think I have a C.

Was anyone getting weird fractions for paper 2 q1???
I got the point of intersection as being (5, -2) or something. But apparently I went from A band 1 to C band none today so don’t take my word for it.
Original post by Ax-MGcxx
Well I needed a B but that’s that gone hahaha don’t even think I have a C.

Was anyone getting weird fractions for paper 2 q1???
did anyone manage to do part a) of the optimisation question in paper 2?? my answer was 16x^2 + 3000/x. I don't understand where the 4000 comes from
also, the last question in paper 1 was crazy
Original post by dude101010
did anyone manage to do part a) of the optimisation question in paper 2?? my answer was 16x^2 + 3000/x. I don't understand where the 4000 comes from
also, the last question in paper 1 was crazy


I managed to get the optimisation question after several goes and a lot of scored out working. I had been calculating the surface area of the top and bottom sides wrong. What was the last question on paper 1 again??
Same. A few questions later I realised that the remaining 1000 comes from calculating the surface area of the inside of the hollow bit.
Original post by dude101010
did anyone manage to do part a) of the optimisation question in paper 2?? my answer was 16x^2 + 3000/x. I don't understand where the 4000 comes from
also, the last question in paper 1 was crazy

Quick Reply

Latest

Trending

Trending