The Student Room Group

Women in Tech Society

According to recent diversity reports, women are still underrepresented in most tech companies, especially in technical and leadership roles.

This group is to support those identifying as female who work in a STEM role, and to encourage others into the sector.

Whether you're a WIT or an ally, introduce yourself here, and get involved in the discussion :biggrin:

Want to join the official soc? You can do so here!

Scroll to see replies

To start us off, I'm a WIT, and currently work as a Software Developer, having graduated from a CompSci degree :yep:
I don't work in tech but I support women in everything, so hugs to everyone here :jumphug:
Hi, I am about to start a grad scheme (tech and innovation) for Liberty Global in Sept. Out of 20ish candidates I was the only female in attendance. Looking forward to comparing notes. Anything I can expect?
Original post by ninabonina
Hi, I am about to start a grad scheme (tech and innovation) for Liberty Global in Sept. Out of 20ish candidates I was the only female in attendance. Looking forward to comparing notes. Anything I can expect?


Know dat feel :tongue:

In terms of actually getting on with the grad scheme though, I have found there are a decent number of other women in the company, and indeed in tech roles. I don't think anything too unexpected came about for me, but I'll let you know if I think of anything, and you're welcome to ask me any questions you might have!

Congratulations on getting your grad scheme place :hugs:
are women also underrepresented applications for jobs at technology firms?
Original post by HoldThisL
are women also underrepresented applications for jobs at technology firms?


As in, are there fewer applications from women than from men? I don't have any figures on this to hand, but I'll look into it and get back to you! :smile:
Original post by shadowdweller
As in, are there fewer applications from women than from men? I don't have any figures on this to hand, but I'll look into it and get back to you! :smile:


It is interesting as not to derail but I don't think it would show the bigger picture, I am male and came from a actual poverty background and noticed less of a gender divide than a social class divide at school and even college when it came to tech subjects. I found it interesting that a local college now has certain subjects like engineering to have female only courses but the regular course is open to both males and female, I felt this is a mixed message because for one by having a mixed and a single sex course it meant a uneven amount of applicants even if traditionally less females go for it still it means a worthy male candidate loses out on the mixed course if they are turned down six of one.

Thats why diversity is a difficult argument, if most applicants are male then by default theres a far greater chance that a male gets a job in that field and by extension is in a leadership or even ownership role, office/call centre and even carers roles (I know the topic is about STEM) are still majorly female so it brings to my attention that numbers alone don't show a lack of diversity as much as theres historically more people trained in those fields.

To finish off and go back to what I started with, I would find it more diverse to have a male from a background of say a very rough area, roughest school in area, parents unable to work, lived hand to mouth who didn't even have the basics who made something of themselves more diverse and inspiring than a female from a background where they didn't struggle, so even if she worked hard to get where she was in the overall picture compared to the guy in the comparison its not even in the same league.

So thats why diversity again is difficult.
Yea sure, I'm all for more women in tech. Would also be interested in discussing why people think there are fewer women than men in the field.
Original post by drbluebox
It is interesting as not to derail but I don't think it would show the bigger picture, I am male and came from a actual poverty background and noticed less of a gender divide than a social class divide at school and even college when it came to tech subjects. I found it interesting that a local college now has certain subjects like engineering to have female only courses but the regular course is open to both males and female, I felt this is a mixed message because for one by having a mixed and a single sex course it meant a uneven amount of applicants even if traditionally less females go for it still it means a worthy male candidate loses out on the mixed course if they are turned down six of one.

Thats why diversity is a difficult argument, if most applicants are male then by default theres a far greater chance that a male gets a job in that field and by extension is in a leadership or even ownership role, office/call centre and even carers roles (I know the topic is about STEM) are still majorly female so it brings to my attention that numbers alone don't show a lack of diversity as much as theres historically more people trained in those fields.

To finish off and go back to what I started with, I would find it more diverse to have a male from a background of say a very rough area, roughest school in area, parents unable to work, lived hand to mouth who didn't even have the basics who made something of themselves more diverse and inspiring than a female from a background where they didn't struggle, so even if she worked hard to get where she was in the overall picture compared to the guy in the comparison its not even in the same league.

So thats why diversity again is difficult.


I think we get to a difficult topic when we start to compare diversity groups, as it starts to get into a discussion on which has it worse and is therefore more deserving of inclusion - and that is largely unimportant, because the reality is we should be looking to increase diversity across the board.

You're right that social class is another excluding factor, but it's one we should be looking to increase in STEM roles as well as women, not instead of them.
Original post by XOR_
Yea sure, I'm all for more women in tech. Would also be interested in discussing why people think there are fewer women than men in the field.


Personally I think part of it is not including women from a young enough age - by the time you reach A-level and Uni stages, it's too late for inclusion plans to really have much affect, because interests and prejudices are already set.
Original post by shadowdweller
I think we get to a difficult topic when we start to compare diversity groups, as it starts to get into a discussion on which has it worse and is therefore more deserving of inclusion - and that is largely unimportant, because the reality is we should be looking to increase diversity across the board.

You're right that social class is another excluding factor, but it's one we should be looking to increase in STEM roles as well as women, not instead of them.


Increasing diversity is the point, but also what we see as diversity even going back to when I was at school boys were seen as strange and even somewhat weak if they were weak in things like woodwork and crafts and girls they had no expectations set, for home economics boys were seen as strange and other negative stereotypes if they wanted to do it. In both cases its prejudices against both genders because of expectations.

Personally over the years I have seen girls being expected to get high grades in fields such as maths at my very school they had female only awards, grants etc specifically aimed at girls but sadly as unfair as that was against the males it also only went to the girls that came from financially well off backgrounds since they were the ones that could afford private tutors in the first place

Im not saying take on less women but look at potential more, someone who came from a background like what I listed has had to work "harder" to get where they were so more inspiring, I'd hate to lose that candidate based on gender or expectations
Original post by drbluebox
Increasing diversity is the point, but also what we see as diversity even going back to when I was at school boys were seen as strange and even somewhat weak if they were weak in things like woodwork and crafts and girls they had no expectations set, for home economics boys were seen as strange and other negative stereotypes if they wanted to do it. In both cases its prejudices against both genders because of expectations.

Personally over the years I have seen girls being expected to get high grades in fields such as maths at my very school they had female only awards, grants etc specifically aimed at girls but sadly as unfair as that was against the males it also only went to the girls that came from financially well off backgrounds since they were the ones that could afford private tutors in the first place

Im not saying take on less women but look at potential more, someone who came from a background like what I listed has had to work "harder" to get where they were so more inspiring, I'd hate to lose that candidate based on gender or expectations


I totally agree this is an interesting discussion point - I'd be happy to continue it in another thread, or by PM? :smile:

I'd ideally like to avoid derailing the thread, though I am interested in discussing this further.
lol was that suppose to happen?
Joined :smile: Data Analyst for TSR here :wavey:
Original post by XOR_
lol was that suppose to happen?


I don't know what I did... enjoy the extra rep I guess? :lol:
Original post by jenhasdreams
Joined :smile: Data Analyst for TSR here :wavey:


Welcome! :hugs:
Original post by shadowdweller
According to recent diversity reports, women are still underrepresented in most tech companies, especially in technical and leadership roles.

This group is to support those identifying as female who work in a STEM role, and to encourage others into the sector.

Whether you're a WIT or an ally, introduce yourself here, and get involved in the discussion :biggrin:

Want to join the official soc? You can do so here!


I believe women should definitely be encouraged to be open to more stem fields, instead of boobs and nails. Encouraged though not pressured. And I don’t believe that there will be a 50/50 distribution of males and females in STEM fields in every case no matter what measures are but into place. That said the encouragement and opportunity should be made more available.
Original post by shadowdweller
According to recent diversity reports, women are still underrepresented in most tech companies, especially in technical and leadership roles.

This group is to support those identifying as female who work in a STEM role, and to encourage others into the sector.

Whether you're a WIT or an ally, introduce yourself here, and get involved in the discussion :biggrin:

Want to join the official soc? You can do so here!


I think it all stems (huehue) from A-Levels and BTECs, you see a disproportionate amount of girls favouring English, Drama, Media etc but more guys favouring Science and ICT. My school was an exception where everyone had to take ICT at A-level

The trouble is that, from observations, girls tend to be more influenced by what their friends do, and if the majority don't want to do STEM leading subjects they won't, even if they want to. As a result, they can no longer do STEM at university, leading to an imbalance.

This isn't always the case as you have yourself proven, but in a large amount of cases.

To give context, at my university for every 100 males doing Engineering there were 2 females, 100:2 ratio, but in media studies the ratio was, 30:100 in favour of females.
This thread reminded me of something I've seen being advertised and talked about quite a bit over the past few months: https://techupwomen.org/

Quick Reply

Latest

Trending

Trending