I was glad it was correlation as that’s what i’d mainly focused on. the only bit that i didn’t like was the nominal data questions, i just hadn’t really looked at strengths and weaknesses of these, and also i struggled to write enough for 6 marks on the conclusions of the bins question. but still i think i did reasonably well ?? maybe

Original post by Yasmin.jade2343

How did it go???

Reply 10

ijustwannapass22

1

what did u guys say for the question about the design of the study and how it increased generalisability?

Reply 11

beckiecp

OP

6

i said if it was matched pairs it would increase generalisability as having matched pairs helps to reduce individual differences as each participant is matched with someone of similar characteristics etc

Original post by ijustwannapass22

what did u guys say for the question about the design of the study and how it increased generalisability?

Reply 12

chinster

11

how was it matched pairs?

Original post by beckiecp

i said if it was matched pairs it would increase generalisability as having matched pairs helps to reduce individual differences as each participant is matched with someone of similar characteristics etc

Reply 13

DiamondFlames

5

Generally found the paper okay, bloody loved that 15 marker although I know I’ve messed up on the generalisability one lol. For the graph question, how many bars did people draw? I only drew two since it asked for the overall number, but some people I know drew 4 so idk at this point.

Reply 14

beckiecp

OP

6

it didn't state what it was?

Original post by chinster

how was it matched pairs?

Reply 15

Yasmin.jade2343

1

Oh yeet I did 4. Probably incorrect but at least I'll get Mark's for labelling it correctly.

Original post by DiamondFlames

Generally found the paper okay, bloody loved that 15 marker although I know I’ve messed up on the generalisability one lol. For the graph question, how many bars did people draw? I only drew two since it asked for the overall number, but some people I know drew 4 so idk at this point.

Reply 16

ethanbaird13

3

Paper was good, didn't get the type 1 and 2 error questions right though

Reply 17

beckiecp

OP

6

I did 4, one for males w steps, males w/o steps, female w steps female w/o steps.

Original post by DiamondFlames

Generally found the paper okay, bloody loved that 15 marker although I know I’ve messed up on the generalisability one lol. For the graph question, how many bars did people draw? I only drew two since it asked for the overall number, but some people I know drew 4 so idk at this point.

Reply 18

kirigiri

16

wow! that was dreadful. messed up both nominal data questions, both secondary data questions, and the design question. also really scared i accidentally wrote participants in the observation conclusions question. actually about to cry, ngl

Reply 19

Yasmin.jade2343

1

What are your grade predictions ?

Original post by kirigiri

wow! that was dreadful. messed up both nominal data questions, both secondary data questions, and the design question. also really scared i accidentally wrote participants in the observation conclusions question. actually about to cry, ngl

OCR Psychology Research Methods 20th May 2019

How did you find the exam?

Quick Reply

Related discussions

Latest

Trending

Trending

Articles for you