The Student Room Group

Scroll to see replies

Original post by jacketpotato
It is never nice to be in a situation like this. But I think you have to take a long term view. Look at this with a 10year or 20year horizon, not a 2year horizon.

The key question is do you want to qualify as a solicitor or not. I doubt any other firm will take you on if you quit a TC mid-way through.

If you do want to qualify as a solicitor, then I think you should slug it out. The reality is that 6months or even 2years is not a long period of time in the scheme of your overall career. It wouldn't be the end of the world to keep your head down, do a half-arsed job and move to a different firm or a different area of law or in-house after you have qualified.

You should also remember that different seats can be very different for all sorts of reasons. It is entirely possible that you might enjoy your next seat more than this one.

It is also worth remembering that you can absolutely come across unfriendly, nasty, stressed people who treat trainees badly in firms like Pinsents or Addleshaws or Slaughters. A lot of first seat trainees can get culture shock when they start proper work for the first time, I certainly suffered from that as a first seat trainee, but people do often adapt after a few months.

There is a lot of luck depending on which department you get and who is working in that department at that particular point in time. I felt badly treated in my first seat (a London firm similar to those) but ended up enjoying it and staying for a few years post-qualification, though in a different department !

That said - if you have decided that you are sure you no longer want to become a solicitor (whether at this firm or any other firm) - then I would ask why you are doing a TC in the first place, in which case there could be a benefit in starting your new career path sooner rather than sticking it out for no reason. Just make sure you check your contract to see if leaving the TC means you need to pay back things like LPC fees.




I can empathise with both of these posts.

On the one hand, I can see the utility in completing the training contract, but on the other hand, if you've made up your mind, you may as well just pull the plug and stop delaying the inevitable.

I trained at one of these mega firms almost six years ago and I'm now almost four years PQE. My first seat was a complete shock to the system (finance) and I dreaded going into work every day. I was bullied every single day by a psychopathic senior associate and was at times on the verge of suicide. I feel so much shame about that still. HOWEVER. The story had a happier ending. I found a practice area I preferred during my TC, qualified there and stayed for a few years post-qualification and then moved to a much smaller firm where the work / life balance is better and the pay is alright.

It is still incredibly dull. I am almost 30 and feel a huge amount of regret having studied law and pursued my 'dream' of going into corporate law and having done something so meaningless throughout my 20s. Attrition is huge and the vast majority of solicitors do NOT stay at mega firms / magic circle / US firms. Law is notoriously jurisdiction / sector specific and difficult to transfer to anything else. Many people become stuck in a lifestyle because of the money and see no way out. The main things I dislike about the job:

- the monotony;
- the pointlessness of it all;
- the obsessive focus on minutiae no sensible person really cares about;
- the infantilisation of associates - if you're not a partner, expect to be treated like a school boy / girl for the rest of your career;
- linking to that - total lack of ownership.. lawyers do not create or build anything and whenever you think you are getting ownership over something it is quickly snatched away by glory hogging partners;
- the fact that lawyers are very poorly rounded people - spend all your time at work / obsessing over pointless crap, don't expect to have much of a personality / any exciting hobbies / interests
- lack of innovation / last on board with any kind of tech
- not making any kind of difference to the world / contribution to society... you start to seriously question how socially unconscious law and most lawyers are, it's kind of disgusting.

Please do something else - law was a huge mistake for me and I'm currently making an exit plan over the next five years. This involves a combination of (a) going back to school; (b) doing community work; and (c) reducing to a part time position.
Just to add a bit of balance to this thread, I am a senior associate in an international city firm and genuinely enjoy my job.

I get to work with a range of different clients, so I get to know lots of different businesses. Most of it is on significant strategic transactions that are key milestones for these companies.

I get the responsibility of running transactions often worth hundreds of millions of pounds, as well as the responsibility of mentoring/developing junior associates and trainees. Or I might be helping growing companies raise finance so that they can grow their business and employ lots more people. That's a clear social good.

I recognise some of the criticisms raised in this thread. But not all of them. I would also argue that a lot of people who complain about life at MC / US firms can have a much better work-life balance and a lot more responsibility by moving to a "top 50" firm or "top 100 firm" - where they will get paid slightly less but still get paid extremely well and will still have good quality work.

If you work at a "mega-firm" and hate it - for heaven's sake, move to a different firm !!!! Why would you insist on working only at 5 law firms when there are probably a hundred major international law firms in the UK?

It is true that a large proportion of junior lawyers move on from their jobs. There are a number of reasons for this I think:
- It is very difficult to know as a graduate what job is right for you - lots of people decide they want to change career after their first job. This is true no matter what job you pick.
- City law is very demanding. The hours can be long - as they are for all professions in the city.
- Lots of people just fall into law because it is a safe, prestigious and well paid option, without really knowing whether it is right for them.
- People's lifestyles change as they get older. Lots of people are game for the pay, training and prestige that city law offers in their twenties, but decide they want a bit of a change as their life situation changes (e.g. if they have kids).
Reply 62
Agree, it does provide a social good and is necessary. Helping companies succeed as probably been what I have enjoyed the most during the last year of my TC and will be a positive of what I take away from it.

Also agree, when someone has been studying law since the age of 17/18 and certain universities are heavily geared towards LLB-LPC-TC route (as mine was), you often find yourself accepting a TC offer without even realising whether you truly want to do it, as was my case.

I still stand by the fact that vacation schemes are marketing shrouds to sell the "dream legal career" and the reality is very different from how it is portrayed, but this is like everything.

At the end of the day, even though I am quitting I still find corporate law concepts interesting. I could easily pursue the academic side of commercial law professionally; it is the practical side which I have found intolerable from a personal point-of-view, but we are all different and I doubt my opinion is rare. It is a stressful environment working with many intense and highly-strung individuals.


Original post by jacketpotato
Just to add a bit of balance to this thread, I am a senior associate in an international city firm and genuinely enjoy my job.

I get to work with a range of different clients, so I get to know lots of different businesses. Most of it is on significant strategic transactions that are key milestones for these companies.

I get the responsibility of running transactions often worth hundreds of millions of pounds, as well as the responsibility of mentoring/developing junior associates and trainees. Or I might be helping growing companies raise finance so that they can grow their business and employ lots more people. That's a clear social good.

It is true that a large proportion of junior lawyers move on from their jobs. There are a number of reasons for this I think:
- It is very difficult to know as a graduate what job is right for you - lots of people decide they want to change career after their first job. This is true no matter what job you pick.
- City law is very demanding. The hours can be long - as they are for all professions in the city.
- Lots of people just fall into law because it is a safe, prestigious and well paid option, without really knowing whether it is right for them.
- People's lifestyles change as they get older. Lots of people are game for the pay, training and prestige that city law offers in their twenties, but decide they want a bit of a change as their life situation changes (e.g. if they have kids).
Original post by jacketpotato
Just to add a bit of balance to this thread, I am a senior associate in an international city firm and genuinely enjoy my job.

I get to work with a range of different clients, so I get to know lots of different businesses. Most of it is on significant strategic transactions that are key milestones for these companies.

I get the responsibility of running transactions often worth hundreds of millions of pounds, as well as the responsibility of mentoring/developing junior associates and trainees. Or I might be helping growing companies raise finance so that they can grow their business and employ lots more people. That's a clear social good.

I recognise some of the criticisms raised in this thread. But not all of them. I would also argue that a lot of people who complain about life at MC / US firms can have a much better work-life balance and a lot more responsibility by moving to a "top 50" firm or "top 100 firm" - where they will get paid slightly less but still get paid extremely well and will still have good quality work.

If you work at a "mega-firm" and hate it - for heaven's sake, move to a different firm !!!! Why would you insist on working only at 5 law firms when there are probably a hundred major international law firms in the UK?

It is true that a large proportion of junior lawyers move on from their jobs. There are a number of reasons for this I think:
- It is very difficult to know as a graduate what job is right for you - lots of people decide they want to change career after their first job. This is true no matter what job you pick.
- City law is very demanding. The hours can be long - as they are for all professions in the city.
- Lots of people just fall into law because it is a safe, prestigious and well paid option, without really knowing whether it is right for them.
- People's lifestyles change as they get older. Lots of people are game for the pay, training and prestige that city law offers in their twenties, but decide they want a bit of a change as their life situation changes (e.g. if they have kids).


How do you handle the hours? I'm just leaving work on the back of my third post-midnight finish in a row this week. Haven't seen my partner, hardly slept, living off crisps, walking into walls because of tiredness. Doesn't happen all the time but probably one week out of every four or five are like this for me.

To be honest I find the work mostly interesting, but the pressure and timing demands are outrageous at times.
Original post by The West Wing
How do you handle the hours? I'm just leaving work on the back of my third post-midnight finish in a row this week. Haven't seen my partner, hardly slept, living off crisps, walking into walls because of tiredness. Doesn't happen all the time but probably one week out of every four or five are like this for me.

To be honest I find the work mostly interesting, but the pressure and timing demands are outrageous at times.

I arrive at 9:30am and leave work most days either around 6pm. A few days a week I might work until 7-8pm. I usually take a proper lunch break.

Occasionally I will work later than that into the small hours - I am doing cross-border M&A deals after all - sometimes you've got to do the hard slog before a completion. This might happen once every couple of months.

I live in central London 10 minutes walk from work.

A big difference for me is being able to plan evening commitments. Every week I arrange a mid-week date with the girlfriend for a meal or the theatre. Back in the Magic Circle I could only do that at weekends.

I just don't experience the outrageous timing demands any more, my job is perfectly manageable and actually quite fun.

I could get an approx. 10% pay rise by moving back to the Magic Circle. I'm not tempted. There is an extremely narrow band of US firms that might tempt me and offer an extremely good work life balance to salary ratio, e.g. somewhere like Goodwin Procter, but I'd never sell my soul to somewhere like Kirkland.

I think it is generally true that the hours get better as you get more senior, too. As you get more senior you can do things much more quickly. More importantly you start getting a lot more control over your timetable.
(edited 4 years ago)
Original post by jacketpotato
I arrive at 9:30am and leave work most days either around 6pm. A few days a week I might work until 7-8pm. I usually take a proper lunch break.

Occasionally I will work later than that into the small hours - I am doing cross-border M&A deals after all - sometimes you've got to do the hard slog before a completion. This might happen once every couple of months.

I live in central London 10 minutes walk from work.

A big difference for me is being able to plan evening commitments. Every week I arrange a mid-week date with the girlfriend for a meal or the theatre. Back in the Magic Circle I could only do that at weekends.

I just don't experience the outrageous timing demands any more, my job is perfectly manageable and actually quite fun.

I could get an approx. 10% pay rise by moving back to the Magic Circle. I'm not tempted. There is an extremely narrow band of US firms that might tempt me and offer an extremely good work life balance to salary ratio, e.g. somewhere like Goodwin Procter, but I'd never sell my soul to somewhere like Kirkland.

I think it is generally true that the hours get better as you get more senior, too. As you get more senior you can do things much more quickly. More importantly you start getting a lot more control over your timetable.


Out of curiosity, what type of firm did you move to following the MC? Are you at a boutique firm or a smaller City firm?

Also, do you think 30 is too late to pursue a masters / change careers? I'm likely going to be made up to Senior Associate next year but I'm seriously considering trying something else as I'm miserable and deathly bored every day.
Original post by cursed child
Out of curiosity, what type of firm did you move to following the MC? Are you at a boutique firm or a smaller City firm?

I moved to another international city firm. I won't specify the name but it is a firm in the following list: Eversheds, Taylor Wessing, Bird & Bird, Gowling WLG, Osborne Clarke, Stephenson Harwood, Addleshaw Goddard. These firms are not quite as big as the Magic Circle firms but they are still massive.

I decided against moving to what I would see as a small firm / boutique firm because I didn't think the work would be as high quality for corporate. If you want to be doing good international corporate work I think it is best to go to a firm which is big enough to have all of the specialist departments and an international presence. It would have also meant a larger pay cut (my pay is probably about 10% less than what I'd get in the Magic Circle; totally worth it IMO. I think the small/boutique firms pay substantially less).

There are of course plenty of people in smaller/boutique firms who are very happy, particularly people who are interested in specialising in niche areas (e.g. sports law, media and entertainment law).

Feel free to PM me if you want

Original post by cursed child
Also, do you think 30 is too late to pursue a masters / change careers? I'm likely going to be made up to Senior Associate next year but I'm seriously considering trying something else as I'm miserable and deathly bored every day.


Not at all. 30 is young. Lots of people change careers in their thirties.

Life is too short to be unhappy. If you are miserable I think its time to change !

According to the Law Society, the average age of a newly qualified solicitor in the UK is 30 (https://www.lawsociety.org.uk/law-careers/becoming-a-solicitor/entry-trends/).
(edited 4 years ago)
Law is not an exciting career 99% of it is admin and boring and most people won't admit this to you. I would follow my heart. I have worked in law for 10 years. I qualified via the paralegal route and now I am qualified I will QUIT law because that's not where my heart lies. Also many other professions pay more than law.I wish you the best. Also technology is changing the profession so I would get out now. You can always move into a different profession now you are still young.
Original post by Solicon
I've since left my big corporate firm to pursue a new career. I don't regret leaving as it has been a tiring 10 months, but I am grateful for the lessons learned.

What’s the new area of work you’re doing and how are you finding it?
Original post by The West Wing
How do you handle the hours? I'm just leaving work on the back of my third post-midnight finish in a row this week. Haven't seen my partner, hardly slept, living off crisps, walking into walls because of tiredness. Doesn't happen all the time but probably one week out of every four or five are like this for me.

To be honest I find the work mostly interesting, but the pressure and timing demands are outrageous at times.

You sound like an employment tribunal claim waiting to happen.
Hi all, thanks to the original poster and all those who've contributed, feel lot better knowing that I'm not alone. I am also considering leaving, I am near the end of my first seat and just dread going in every day, I've already had stress with HR and eventually moved to a new supervisor because I was being under utilised, but very little improvement (it's a long, irritating story)I am willing to give my next seat a try, but in the event that I still hate it and want to quit, my firm requires you to pay back a percentage of your LPC costs depending on when you quit in your TC (from memory, repayment decreases by 25% per seat you've done out of 4)Is it worth quitting then if I have to repay it? I am honestly still debating whether law is for me, I've just not had enough work to do to determine whether I want to try it out. I am at a good City firm, not magic circle but my department is very clique-y/lots of backstabbing and generally unpleasant so hopefully it's just this department, and given people have said a TC is not really worth much when you're done, is it still worth completing it just to not have to pay back the money? Please help :frown:
Original post by koala-t16
Hi all, thanks to the original poster and all those who've contributed, feel lot better knowing that I'm not alone. I am also considering leaving, I am near the end of my first seat and just dread going in every day, I've already had stress with HR and eventually moved to a new supervisor because I was being under utilised, but very little improvement (it's a long, irritating story)I am willing to give my next seat a try, but in the event that I still hate it and want to quit, my firm requires you to pay back a percentage of your LPC costs depending on when you quit in your TC (from memory, repayment decreases by 25% per seat you've done out of 4)Is it worth quitting then if I have to repay it? I am honestly still debating whether law is for me, I've just not had enough work to do to determine whether I want to try it out. I am at a good City firm, not magic circle but my department is very clique-y/lots of backstabbing and generally unpleasant so hopefully it's just this department, and given people have said a TC is not really worth much when you're done, is it still worth completing it just to not have to pay back the money? Please help :frown:

I am not a solicitor and there are solicitors on these forums who can perhaps provide advice that draws on personal experience, but from what you've said the obvious next step seems to be to dig in, finish this seat, and see how things go in the next seat. The issues you have described with your department and supervision may well persist to some degree in your next seat, but equally they may not. It's easy to forget that whilst a trainee in their first seat is undertaking something that they have worked hard towards, it is also a significant leap from academic study and the LPC, particularly if you have no or limited experience of that working environment or that particular department. Whilst people may expect you to just adjust to that (and you may indeed have expected it yourself), it is often not that simple, particularly when the work environment is challenging. In your next seat you will have had the experience of one seat (as unpleasant as that may have been) and can carry the positives (limited as they may be) into a new environment, which hopefully will be better for you. One positive that does seem apparent from your post is that involving HR actually resulted in a change. Albeit one that didn't solve the issue, but the willingness to at least put something in place perhaps bodes well for resolving any other issues in future. For now though, I would just get to the end of this seat, approach the next one in as open minded a way as possible, and see how it goes. If nothing changes for you substantively, it's a matter for you as to whether it is feasible or worth it for you to finish the training contract, and to balance that against the money that you'll have to pay back. But I wouldn't get too far ahead with that thought process. Take it one step at a time, get to the next seat, and reassess once you've settled there. Best of luck.
Reply 72
Original post by koala-t16
Hi all, thanks to the original poster and all those who've contributed, feel lot better knowing that I'm not alone. I am also considering leaving, I am near the end of my first seat and just dread going in every day, I've already had stress with HR and eventually moved to a new supervisor because I was being under utilised, but very little improvement (it's a long, irritating story)I am willing to give my next seat a try, but in the event that I still hate it and want to quit, my firm requires you to pay back a percentage of your LPC costs depending on when you quit in your TC (from memory, repayment decreases by 25% per seat you've done out of 4)Is it worth quitting then if I have to repay it? I am honestly still debating whether law is for me, I've just not had enough work to do to determine whether I want to try it out. I am at a good City firm, not magic circle but my department is very clique-y/lots of backstabbing and generally unpleasant so hopefully it's just this department, and given people have said a TC is not really worth much when you're done, is it still worth completing it just to not have to pay back the money? Please help :frown:


Hi there, OP here :smile:

Definitely try your second seat. That's what I did. I actually enjoyed my second seat until I left, but that was basically because my mind was already made up beyond the point of no return, and I didn't want a career in law whatsoever anymore. But you will gain experience and skills from your second seat even if you do decide to leave :smile:

I didn't have to repay any of my LPC contributions, which was a big factor in me leaving! I think if I did have to repay, I'm not sure what I what have done, although I won't go down hypothetical routes. Let us all know how you're doing in your new seat :smile:
Reply 73
OP here. Glad this thread got so much attention - I never expected it to but it's amazing it is being used to help one another out and giving advice in times of need.

Thought I would give a 10-month update. I'm doing Teach First at the moment. After my experience of my TC, I am finding it relatively easy and I have an amazing work-life balance. I can thank the skills I got from my TC for that.

Do I regret leaving? Not at all, I don't even think about it anymore. I enjoy life and my mental health is a lot better.

Do I ever fantasise about what it would have been like if I stayed and qualified? No, not really. There was a point at the 3-month mark I will say that I panicked about my decision and started researching about re-applying, but it was very short-lived and comes with any similar big-life decisions I think.

Will I stay in my current career forever? Maybe, maybe not. To me, it is not important. I am once again living for the moment, instead of living in the future.

Good luck to everyone. <3
I have also recently quit my TC. My TC was in quite a specialist firm. It was very commercial, the people were awful and the work was very boring, to the point where I had to pinch myself to try and stay awake in client meetings! I have got a paralegal job now in an area of law I enjoy (personal legal services rather than commercial). The pay is pretty low and I do intend on applying for a training contract within a personal legal services firm when they next open. However, I have always considered a career in teaching. Do you mind me asking what subject you are teaching? Do you have a law undergrad?
For those of you considering quitting at the end of qualification and want to do something more rewarding with your experience why not consider coming to the Bar, it could be fun? :smile:
Original post by Emma22090909
I have also recently quit my TC. My TC was in quite a specialist firm. It was very commercial, the people were awful and the work was very boring, to the point where I had to pinch myself to try and stay awake in client meetings! I have got a paralegal job now in an area of law I enjoy (personal legal services rather than commercial). The pay is pretty low and I do intend on applying for a training contract within a personal legal services firm when they next open. However, I have always considered a career in teaching. Do you mind me asking what subject you are teaching? Do you have a law undergrad?

You can’t really train to teach law because it’s only taught at A Level.
Interestingly I am going through the exact same experience during my real estate seat in a similar firm. I hate every day and have developed anxiety which I attribute to the job. My stomach drops when I see an email come into my inbox and I feel debilitatingly stressed all the time because no matter what I suggest, someone has something negative to say about it (not in a constructive way). This isn't my first seat of my training contract, and prior to this seat I enjoyed learning, felt confident in my job and got on with my colleagues. I think if I hadn't had this seat I probably wouldn't feel this way about the job, but currently I want nothing more than to hand in my notice and get as far away from the legal industry as possible. I don't blame the people I work with, I think the industry itself has become (or always was) toxic. Would love to hear how things turned out for you/if anything changed your mind, because I need to make a decision soon as I can't press on with this situation much longer.
Original post by TheMandalorian
You can’t really train to teach law because it’s only taught at A Level.

I know, that is why I was asking what subject OP was training to teach.
Original post by Gh6zi09+
Interestingly I am going through the exact same experience during my real estate seat in a similar firm. I hate every day and have developed anxiety which I attribute to the job. My stomach drops when I see an email come into my inbox and I feel debilitatingly stressed all the time because no matter what I suggest, someone has something negative to say about it (not in a constructive way). This isn't my first seat of my training contract, and prior to this seat I enjoyed learning, felt confident in my job and got on with my colleagues. I think if I hadn't had this seat I probably wouldn't feel this way about the job, but currently I want nothing more than to hand in my notice and get as far away from the legal industry as possible. I don't blame the people I work with, I think the industry itself has become (or always was) toxic. Would love to hear how things turned out for you/if anything changed your mind, because I need to make a decision soon as I can't press on with this situation much longer.

Commercial/city law firms have an incredibly toxic culture where people will happily throw you under the bus to get a promotion. The long hours and very corporate nature of city firms is not for everyone. But not all of the legal sector is like that. Regional firms and boutique law firms have a far friendlier culture compared to large city firms. Maybe go for a boutique law firm in the area of law you are interested in. Then you won’t have to go through seats you hate. You could also do some outreach like work. I know someone who works in criminal law for a charity that supports victims of sexual assault and rape. The pay is a lot less than city law firms but in return you feel like you are helping people rather than simply making money for a business.

Plus, you are less likely to meet toxic colleagues in these environments because most people in these charity sectors are passionate about the cause.

Latest

Trending

Trending