Tort Law Help Please

While in essence your answers may be correct, academic law is not really about a right and wrong answer, its about how you get to that particular answer.

Post how you got to them answers and we can help you.

I am a bit confused with the 2nd question.

I thought that yes he could make a claim in Tort against Thomas Limited because Jason is an employee and his negligent behaviour led to Dave's injury but on the other hand I was thinking that they provided both employees with training therefore they are absorbed from any claim?

You need to discuss so much more than this, use what you have learnt in tort law. Is there a duty, is there a breach, is there causation.

Its about vicarious liability. You will have been taught everything you need to answer the question.

That is why I was asking for help lol
You seem to be upset about me asking these questions but I thought this is what the forum was for?

Not sure why you think i'm upset. Go over your notes, pick out the relevant parts, discuss and apply to the facts of the scenario then conclude.

Not sure why you think i'm upset. Go over your notes, pick out the relevant parts, discuss and apply to the facts of the scenario then conclude.

I think I am done and have answered them pretty in depth.

Just adding another question that I found on another past paper - if for example the scenario I gave above - Sarah wants to make a claim having suffered from flashbacks and nightmares (recieving treatment from her doctor) from what she witnessed, would she be able to make a claim or is that only possible for physical injuries?

That is why I was asking for help lol
You seem to be upset about me asking these questions but I thought this is what the forum was for?

Really, people will respond if you're asking something actually complicated and something you might struggle to understand without assistance.

Basic tort principles can be easily found in lectures, never mind textbooks and whatever else you have access to. If you read the stickied post, it explains the level of depth you are expected to explain your issue in and how you are supposed to present it. E.g. point to cases, particular quotes contained in judgments and academic commentary, particular phrases used. Some stuff more specific than "explain to me basic principles of psych injury and vicarious liability".

When people ask complicated questions, I usually always help. I get to learn something new and have a eureka moment. This stuff is just boring.

Fair enough but I don't see what's the point of commenting if you find this stuff so easy and you don't want to help
There might as well be a rule then that you can only post hard questions on here if you are so offended smh.

I was just explaining why people are continually disappointed when they post questions. It really comes down to the question being found in your textbook easily.

If you look at the sticky, it tells you to set out which books and other things you've already checked and found no answer, as to eliminate them from the answerer's investigations. With a simple problem, you'd have already found the answer in these books and therefore these simple questions are practically impossible to comply with the rules as set out in the sticky.

So people should just stop posting simple stuff and should, as James said, just check their textbook and notes. It is not one for us.

Really, people will respond if you're asking something actually complicated and something you might struggle to understand without assistance.

Basic tort principles can be easily found in lectures, never mind textbooks and whatever else you have access to. If you read the stickied post, it explains the level of depth you are expected to explain your issue in and how you are supposed to present it. E.g. point to cases, particular quotes contained in judgments and academic commentary, particular phrases used. Some stuff more specific than "explain to me basic principles of psych injury and vicarious liability".

When people ask complicated questions, I usually always help. I get to learn something new and have a eureka moment. This stuff is just boring.