# Integration of (1/kx)Watch

Announcements
Thread starter 12 years ago
#1
If you want to do this:
where k is a constant, you can either take that as: or , which respectively integrate to and . But obviously they're different so what is the explanation???????
0
12 years ago
#2
You are forgetting the constant that comes out as well (the + C) which can combine with whatever is inside the ln
0
12 years ago
#3
(Original post by mrsmann)
If you want to do this:
where k is a constant, you can either take that as: or , which respectively integrate to and . But obviously they're different so what is the explanation???????
0
Thread starter 12 years ago
#4
Ok thanks for the replies.

+c sucks
0
12 years ago
#5
(Original post by mrsmann)
Ok thanks for the replies.

+c sucks
+c > you.
0
Thread starter 12 years ago
#6
(Original post by generalebriety)
mrsmann > +c > me.
Fixed!
0
12 years ago
#7
(Original post by mrsmann)
Fixed!
Ah yes. I forgot to carry the 1.
0
Thread starter 12 years ago
#8
I don't get it
0
12 years ago
#9
1/k lnk is just a constant....
0
1 month ago
#10
(Original post by Sudarshan stud)
U can also do like this right take (kx) to numerator it will become (kx)pow -1, then integrate, it becomes k×((x)pow-2/-2)..... Then which is right.........????????
This thread is 12 years old. When you integrate you add 1 to the power. You have subtracted 1, but it doesn't work when the power is - 1. I suggest you make a new thread instead.
0
X

new posts
Back
to top
Latest
My Feed

### Oops, nobody has postedin the last few hours.

Why not re-start the conversation?

see more

### See more of what you like onThe Student Room

You can personalise what you see on TSR. Tell us a little about yourself to get started.

### Poll

Join the discussion

#### How has the start of this academic year been for you?

Loving it - gonna be a great year (109)
17.99%
It's just nice to be back! (163)
26.9%
Not great so far... (217)
35.81%
I want to drop out! (117)
19.31%