You dismiss valid criticisms by saying "they're left wing"; the channel 4
live debate was not an interview, I don't understand how they could manipulate it? Also, it's not simply "they're left wing, of course they'd say thatl", they're educated economists and academics.
I showed examples of bad **** he's done but if you, the website I linked details countless lies (I'm not going to regurgitate them here), islamaphobia you have **** like calling muslim women "letterboxes" and has failed to condemn the clear islamaphobia within his party, has said disgusting things abour poor people and those in unfortunate positions, for example,
here's one from today,
here's another one "children of single mothers were 'ill-raised, ignorant, aggressive and illegitimate'",
here's another one, I digress; blatant corruption, for example the Jennifer Arcuri grants and affair, also the garden bridge bull****. I'm not going to waste time listing more as it'll more than likely be disregarded as leftist bull**** or something.
I don't understand what you mean about the NHS, they claim to have plans to build new hospitals, it was a proven lie (only upgrading 6 existing), they have a pledge in their manifesto to recruit x amount new nurses, another proven lie. If I told you the Conservatives have plans to "recruit 50,000
more nurses" does that suggest to you that
any of them will be
existing nurses?
Corbyn being a terrorist sympathiser is an entirely flawed argument, furthermore the papers prove that talks have been conducted "between July 2017 and July 2019" and have discussed "drug patents, the pharmaceutical industry, health insurance and medical devices as part of the post-Brexit trade deal.". Trump himself claimed "everything is on the table" when questioned regarding the NHS as part of a trade deal at a
US-UK conference. It should be overwhelmingly obvious that any deal with the US regarding healthcare WILL NOT result in
cheaper drugs.
"The not having an interview with Andrew Neil well yeah I can see how that can be construed as running scared but really he is just avoiding losing votes."... How can you honestly not onyl contend, but believe that Johnson is a strong leader and then suppose he is "scared of losing votes" by not participating in an interview... A "strong leader" that cannot even face the due scrutiny that all other party leaders have; truly pathetic.