The 2019 General Election was a lot of things. It was one of the most polarising elections of our time, and indeed one of the most populist. Two populist candidates (yes, you can be a populist and a leftwinger, and Jeremy Corbyn is a massive populist) running head to head in a nation that is split between Leave and Remain.
It certainly was never going to be an easy election for Labour to win.
When the incredibly dissapointing results came in, the inevitable blame game instantly begun. Literally, within minutes, Andrew Neil had John McDonnell in the BBC studios, with McDonnell blaming Brexit on Labour's abysmal performance. This rhetoric was echoed in the days that followed, as pundits seized on the chance to give Corbyn's Labour one final grilling.
The answer, frankly, goes beyond Brexit.
The election result was not a vote for Boris, or a vote against Corbyn. It was a vote for Brexit. The massive majority of people who voted Conservative sent shockwaves through the Labour party HQ. Their northern heartlands had been lost to the Tories. For a while, it looked like they would have less than 200 MPs in Parliament. Fortuntely, it wasn't as bad, with 202 seats, but still, absolutely terrible if I may so myself as a Labour party member. I'm a member of the local CLP (Constituency Labour Party) group chat, and as the exit poll were released, to be frank, everyone was ****ting themselves.
I tried to encourage a false sense of optimism, maybe the polls would be wrong, massively perhaps. Maybe they really had got it wrong. A few hours later, it was clear that whilst the inital poll was slightly off (191 Labour compared to eventual 202), it was indeed a defeat - a massive one - for Labour.
The battle, was lost. But the war continues!
Brexit undoubtedly played a massive role. I believed it was a massive mistake for Labour to not honour the result of 2016. They did so in 2017, and we had a hung parliament. Granted, a much weaker Tory candidate was running, but we still did incredibly well compared to 2019's performance.
Instead, Labour was overrun by middle class hubris, the same that ensured that the Remain vote was obliterated in 2016 by Leave. The same hubris possessed by Labour leadership candidates like Emily Thornberry, who decry the national flag of England, and wear massive EU ones instead.
If Thornberry, Lammy, or any other remainer/liberal take charge of Labour, the party might as well be commiting suicide. If Labour is not dead already - and I sincerely hope not - it will be within a matter of minutes if one of these candidates take charge. Brexit will be done by 2024, but what's to say that one of these idiots then doesn't try and having another shot at calling a so called "People's Vote?" I wouldn't put it past them.
Labour ignored its Northern voters, instead it focused on gaining traction on the Lib Dems by appealing with a People's Vote. Whilst campaigning, I actually bought myself round to agreeing with this and Corbyn's neutrality policy, because at the time I felt it was the best way to unite both sides of the party without alienating one side. Clearly, this did not work, and the leadership should have realised this.
Labour should have simply said they would have honoured the result of the referendum. All they literally had to do. They should have also silenced Blairites, liberals and other people like John Ashworth who discredited Corbyn. Dianne Abbot, should have also not been spared from such a purge.
The Labour party must rebuild itself as a truly working class, socialist party. For its next manifesto, it should not think of a million and one things to offer the British public. It should be a simple message: Healthcare, Jobs, Education. They, after all, are the most important things to a functioning society, as opposed to free broadband or a few other gimmicks here and there.
Should they become "less" leftwing? Yes and no. They should not deviate from the position of a democratic socialist party. Absolutely not. If I had it my way, they would become more left wing. But that's me, and not the public, and its the public who are entrusted to vote for us. We must serve the public and not ourselves. Something that seems to have been ignored.
So, in terms of economics, they should remain the same, except stop chucking in another policy every five minutes. The public didn't - no pun intended - "buy" the idea of free wifi, that would have cost in excess of £40 billion. Many Labour party members who worked in BT discredited this idea and expressed their concerns, but were ignored.
However, it should elect a leader who doesn't have 35 years of history to throw at them. They should not be associated with any undesirable figures like Hamas or the PLO, even if it was in the context of reconcilliation and dialogue rather than praise and support as the Daily Mail would have you believe. That doesn't mean they should be pro Israel, although their electoral success could depend on it, but they shouldn't be associated with antisemites, like Hamas and many people in the PLO. They should be committed to patriotism - not rampant nationalism like some Tories and the far right, but maintaining a sense of pride in the country. Perhaps "Rule Brittania" would be more appropriate as opposed to The Red Flag. Actually, this is not something I would endorse, due to the colonial references in the former, but rather, Labour should reclaim the England flag from the far right so people like Thornberry don't have to criticise it, in the process alienating the white working classes.
To sum up; less free broadband, less Remainers, more Brexit, more working class!