The Student Room Group

Is my revision method bad?

I just had an assembly in school about useful revision methods and such because we have our 2nd set of mocks when we come back. They talked about how highlighting and reading from a book is useless and ineffective but that's basically what I do. I recently found this method after my 1st mocks which were decent so I have no evidence that it works. I think it works well though. Imo most people try convince themselves that they're revising by making notes but then by the time they're done making all the notes, there's no time to practice.

What I do is find or get textbook PDFs of every subject (since textbooks teach and do basically everything with more details that revision guides (like how to answer, examples, etc.) and then find the specification/PLC for them. I only use textbooks and PDFs because most of my teachers are horrible so I have to teach myself things and because PDFs allow me to highlight, edit, add text etc on adobe acrobat. Anyways, I then look at the spec/PLC and highlight the things from there which is on the spec. This way, when I want to revise a topic, I go to the page and see the highlighted things, memorise them with my good memory and then quiz myself with the spec. After this, I do many exam questions provided by the textbooks and from online too. I think it's better as I can use what's already provided without having to make hundreds of notes and cards.

What do you think? Is this ineffective like the teachers say?
Original post by UrGrandpap
I just had an assembly in school about useful revision methods and such because we have our 2nd set of mocks when we come back. They talked about how highlighting and reading from a book is useless and ineffective but that's basically what I do. I recently found this method after my 1st mocks which were decent so I have no evidence that it works. I think it works well though. Imo most people try convince themselves that they're revising by making notes but then by the time they're done making all the notes, there's no time to practice.

What I do is find or get textbook PDFs of every subject (since textbooks teach and do basically everything with more details that revision guides (like how to answer, examples, etc.) and then find the specification/PLC for them. I only use textbooks and PDFs because most of my teachers are horrible so I have to teach myself things and because PDFs allow me to highlight, edit, add text etc on adobe acrobat. Anyways, I then look at the spec/PLC and highlight the things from there which is on the spec. This way, when I want to revise a topic, I go to the page and see the highlighted things, memorise them with my good memory and then quiz myself with the spec. After this, I do many exam questions provided by the textbooks and from online too. I think it's better as I can use what's already provided without having to make hundreds of notes and cards.

What do you think? Is this ineffective like the teachers say?


It sounds like it is working for you, and you sound like you're putting in a lot of effort. Keep it up :smile:
Reply 2
yes! this is what i do and it works for me. everyone is different, schools can give out the wrong information a lot of the time.
Honestly, your method sounds very systematic and if you prefer it who really cares. I think when teachers talk about the ineffectiveness of reading and highlighting, they’re talking about people passively reading the textbook, not taking anything in, and saying that’s enough.

I prefer to make summary notes, but that’s only because my class notes are disorganised and rewriting them in a clear and concise way helps me learn it. I also make flashcards based on the summary notes to test myself, but I don’t stress if I don’t have time to make them because the summary can be enough.

Revision, at the end of true day, only works if it’s tailored to you. There’s no right way to revise (hell, I know people who only skim the textbook before the exam and get a decent score - not suggesting this btw).

Good luck on your exams!!
Reply 4
Original post by UrGrandpap
when I want to revise a topic, I go to the page and see the highlighted things, memorise them with my good memory and then quiz myself with the spec. After this, I do many exam questions provided by the textbooks and from online too. I think it's better as I can use what's already provided without having to make hundreds of notes and cards.

Is this GCSE or A level? How many subjects are you doing?

It's great while your memory is strong enough -- at some point the amount of material you need to memorise may increase and your method may need modification(s).
Reply 5
Original post by DrawTheLine
It sounds like it is working for you, and you sound like you're putting in a lot of effort. Keep it up :smile:

Yeah I guess it does and I'll try! Thanks for your help!
Reply 6
Original post by kiyuni
yes! this is what i do and it works for me. everyone is different, schools can give out the wrong information a lot of the time.

Glad I'm not the only one and yeah, I guess this is another example of my school giving out wrong information
Reply 7
Original post by Elizabeth2002
Honestly, your method sounds very systematic and if you prefer it who really cares. I think when teachers talk about the ineffectiveness of reading and highlighting, they’re talking about people passively reading the textbook, not taking anything in, and saying that’s enough.

I prefer to make summary notes, but that’s only because my class notes are disorganised and rewriting them in a clear and concise way helps me learn it. I also make flashcards based on the summary notes to test myself, but I don’t stress if I don’t have time to make them because the summary can be enough.

Revision, at the end of true day, only works if it’s tailored to you. There’s no right way to revise (hell, I know people who only skim the textbook before the exam and get a decent score - not suggesting this btw).

Good luck on your exams!!

Yeah I understand what you mean. Everyone is different. I might try looking at the summary though. Most of my textbooks have a section like that. Thanks for the tip. Also yeah, there's some people I know who do revision on the morning and get 8s and 9s somehow. Anyways, thanks for the help
Reply 8
Original post by errrr99
Is this GCSE or A level? How many subjects are you doing?

It's great while your memory is strong enough -- at some point the amount of material you need to memorise may increase and your method may need modification(s).

GCSE and 10 subjects. 7 if you don't count Combined trilogy as 3.
When we talk about "good" or "bad" revision subjects we're normally ignoring that revision is subjective.
Take for example me. I have ADHD, meaning I have no short term memory. It's more common for my brain to throw new information out than hold onto it, so your method would be "bad" for me.
Meanwhile I will take short notes which summarise chapters and I don't sit exams. It would be useless to you to have post it note filled books with references to where you could include points in an essay, so this way of revision would be "bad" for you.
All I can really suggest is make sure you learn other methods now whilst you have breathing room, because I used to have a phenominal memory too. It was actually during my GCSEs where my memory really failed me, and I ended up getting D's and E's.
Yours may continue to be fine, but it doesn't hurt to have a few different methods uo your sleeve as a contingency plan, y'know?

Quick Reply

Latest