The Student Room Group

St Louis couple charged for pointing guns at protesters

Scroll to see replies

Reply 40
Original post by Underscore__
All I asked was what makes you think they had automatic weapons, I’ll give you the benefit of the doubt and just correct you to say they were holding semi automatic weapons. Automatic weapons are very hard to get hold of, very expensive, and very uncommon

Semi, schmemi.
Original post by QE2
Semi, schmemi.


Do you always respond so childishly when you’re shown to be wrong?
Original post by Underscore__
Do you always respond so childishly when you’re shown to be wrong?

QE2 flexing (on another thread): "I'vE gOt aN aWarD fOr dEbaTinG"

also QE2: acts like a child
Original post by Underscore__
Do you always respond so childishly when you’re shown to be wrong?

:yep:
Reply 44
Original post by QE2
"Some accounts"?
White lawyer - "I felt threatened by the black man, so I shot him".
White judge - "Seams reasonable. You're free to go".

Oh how they laughed down at the NRA Samuel Bowers memorial BBQ.

Yes, that is what i said.
Sounds a perfectly reasonable excuse.
Original post by QE2
Did all the other residents of Portland Place feel the need to threaten protesters with automatic weapons?

No one had automatic weapons.
Original post by QE2
While everyone has the right to security in their own home, these two lose that right on grounds of taste alone.
Remember that this is a recent build. Shame on them!

I'm more inclined for this than some ghastly glass and steal monstrosity. Let alone concrete.
Reply 45
Original post by Occitanie
QE2 flexing (on another thread): "I'vE gOt aN aWarD fOr dEbaTinG"

also QE2: acts like a child

Not a fan of irony then?
Original post by QE2
"Some accounts"?
White lawyer - "I felt threatened by the black man, so I shot him".
White judge - "Seams reasonable. You're free to go".

Oh how they laughed down at the NRA Samuel Bowers memorial BBQ.

Oh look. You're at it again! More identity politics for us to feast our eyes over!
Original post by QE2
Not a fan of irony then?


And what exactly is that irony lol?
Original post by QE2
"He was beaten to death with a hammer!"
"Akshully, it was a mallet. Ur wrong, hurr durr"


And that shows why you should probably learn a bit more about guns before developing such strong opinions of American gun laws
Reply 49
Original post by Underscore__
And that shows why you should probably learn a bit more about guns before developing such strong opinions of American gun laws

As I said before, semi, schmemi. The distinction is irrelevant in the context of threatening people with it.
"The defendant shot the victim with an automatic rifle".
"Objection! Akshully, it was a a semi-automatic".
"Is the victim still dead?"
"Yes, your honour"
"Does being semi rather than fully automatic have any bearing on the case?"
"No, your honour"
"Well stop wasting my ****ing time, you idiot. The prosecution may proceed".

When that is the strength of your argument, you know you have already lost.
Original post by QE2
As I said before, semi, schmemi. The distinction is irrelevant in the context of threatening people with it.
"The defendant shot the victim with an automatic rifle".
"Objection! Akshully, it was a a semi-automatic".
"Is the victim still dead?"
"Yes, your honour"
"Does being semi rather than fully automatic have any bearing on the case?"
"No, your honour"
"Well stop wasting my ****ing time, you idiot. The prosecution may proceed".

When that is the strength of your argument, you know you have already lost.


So you know nothing about guns or judicial process?
Original post by QE2
Irony is for grown ups. You'll have to wait.


HAHAHAHA! You're pathetic.
This is what happens when you have far-left activists in power.


"To be clear, this prosecution has nothing to do with the abridgement of any consitutional right" Gardner's brief said "If any part of our constitution is implicated, it is the First Amendment --- which guarantees the right of speech and assembly that cannot be said to be freely exercise when those who disagree with us resort to brandisihng lethal weapons rather than egnagiging in civil discourge. "


Um they smashed down their gate and threatened them on their private property.

ehgterh.jpg
(edited 3 years ago)
Reply 53
Original post by Underscore__
So you know nothing about guns or judicial process?

I know plenty about both. What is particularly irking you?
Reply 54
Original post by Townsend419
This is what happens when you have far-left activists in power.

Which are the "far-left activists in power" in the US?
Original post by QE2
I know plenty about both. What is particularly irking you?


Your inability to differentiate between semi automatic and automatic rifles (particularly the applicable law and availability). The strange scene you’ve tried to set of a courtroom featuring the most inept judge in history.
Original post by Townsend419
This is what happens when you have far-left activists in power.

Um they smashed down their gate and threatened them on their private property.

Pulling out guns because some protesters broke a communal gate. Completely justified!
Original post by SHallowvale
Pulling out guns because some protesters broke a communal gate. Completely justified!

That's the thing, it is under Missouri Castle Law :lol:
Reply 58
Original post by SHallowvale
Pulling out guns because some protesters broke a communal gate. Completely justified!

Not exactly unreasonable if a bunch of angry thugs invade your property..
Original post by Napp
Not exactly unreasonable if a bunch of angry thugs invade your property..

"Laws don't care about your feelings!" :lol:

Quick Reply

Latest

Trending

Trending