17 year old charged with homicide during riots in America

What about the video that surfaced today showing Kyle beating a girl in the head and kidneys from behind? Clearly he's no angel himself.

If Trump wins, even by a decent margin, the violence will continue if not get worse.

https://www.reddit.com/r/Conservative/comments/iifu8e/an_analysis_of_the_criminal_complaint_against/

In short, the only charge he can actually be convicted on is possession of a dangerous weapon by someone under 18.

It doesn't. But equally what does anyone's background have to do with anything?

You said that 'either way' you wouldn't have much sympathy. I took that to mean even if it wasn't self defence, you wouldn't feel too bad about it. So now it turns out Kyle is a woman beater, surely you don't feel too bad about him being attacked by a mob, either?

Are you comparing an allegation of scuffles with a protestor to those os a convicted paedophile and other serial criminals who tried to murder a kid?
Well as you have yet to actually show any evidence of this allegation... Equally, being "a woman beater" is not a crime in of itself. At touch sexist to say that its okay to fight men and not women though, no?

Completely forgot about that. Is it right or wrong to fight women? I’ve seen so much talk about equality that I wonder if people are happy to accept the negatives to that side? Personally though, I just couldn’t bring myself to hit a woman

True say on that. Although on this i was more pointing out the dubious reasoning behind creating a false equivalence between a scuffle with some girl (if its the video i just saw it appears she went for him first anyway?) and defending himself from, quite literally, a violent mob of sex offenders and wife beaters
I mean i do agree with you as a general point i wouldnt hit a woman but i do take exception to it being used as a point to try and slander the kid here, and he is a kid after all.

True say on that. Although on this i was more pointing out the dubious reasoning behind creating a false equivalence between a scuffle with some girl (if its the video i just saw it appears she went for him first anyway?) and defending himself from, quite literally, a violent mob of sex offenders and wife beaters
I mean i do agree with you as a general point i wouldnt hit a woman but i do take exception to it being used as a point to try and slander the kid here, and he is a kid after all.

Personally, I don't see the unrest in the US ending without a "clean" win for one party or other - i.e. that one party wins both the popular and electoral votes in the presidential election, and takes both houses of Congress, without any real irregularities or legal machinations clouding the result.

It's very unlikely indeed, near enough impossible that the GOP can manage this. At present I'd say it's probably more likely the Democrats manage it than not, but certainly a good chance that they don't. Possibly the worst-case scenario for stability is Trump losing the popular vote by a good margin but managing to narrowly eke out an Electoral College win, combined with the GOP very narrowly holding onto the Senate 51-49 or even 50-50 with Pence as tiebreaker. Unfortunately, this is a very plausible outcome.

This video? Nobody 'goes for him' lol

So there's been a fatal shooting in Portland. The victim is reportedly far right. It'll be interesting to see how the left and right realign their grievances and apologia over this one.

I saw it from a different angle, my bad.

Either way, what does it have to do with the original point given this cannot in any conceivable way be related to his defending himself from murderous rioters?

About as much as anybody else's background has to do with the situation.

So in other words you're not making a point at all? Glad we got that cleared up i guess?

What makes him far right?

So we agree. Bringing up the backgrounds of those involved doesn't serve any useful purpose.

Umm seeing as i used it solely to say i didnt have any sympathy for them getting themselves shot it has a very useful purpose. I think you're confusing me justifying them being shot because theyre a bunch of violent rapists and me simply not caring that they did.

Yet you seem to care plenty about Kyle finding himself assailed by a mob despite his violent past. The real purpose seems to be to provide some sort of emotional gratification. I mean just look at the escalation of the language you're using. "Bunch of violent rapists?" Only one of the three people he shot had a record of sexual crime. The one shot in the arm only has a record of petty crime.