Hey! Honestly, I completely forgot about source evaluation for my EPQ and had to shove notes from my research into an appendix as examples of being evaluative - ended up working for me, but I don't think I would've gotten away with it had I not been evaluating a source (in the form of responding to a critic's book) within my essay. Try to evaluate your sources as you go along, but if you can't do every single one then just do enough to fill up 2-3 pages in your appendix. You should evaluate sources for their credibility - consider its publication (is it just an opinion post, or is it from an academic journal that was peer-reviewed?), the date (is this a recent finding, or is the source now outdated?), the author's purpose (was this source written with a vested interest, eg. to persuade, sell something, fearmonger, exaggerate?), its reliance on existing research and data, and the position of the author (are they a notable academic/researcher in this field of study?).
In terms of general advice, examiners are looking for students who use a wide range of sources throughout their essay - for example, my essay referenced articles, books, lectures I'd watched, documentaries, interviews with academics, emails I'd written to literary critics. They also love to see students making links between sources they've found, eg. using two different sources to support a point you've made, or contrasting two sources and then arguing that they're both flawed and making your own argument.
The quality of your writing should also be something to keep in mind - you're not just being judged on what you say, but also how you say it. Make sure that your writing style is clear, and that you're not complicating things or using fancy words unnecessarily - it's so easy to get swept up in pseudo-academic babble when writing academic essays, so I'd recommend sending it to a teacher or even showing it to a family member and asking them to judge the readability of your writing. The mark of a good writer is that they do all the hard work of making the work understandable, so the reader doesn't have to.
Make sure your argument is cogent and that your paragraphs flow easily one after the other with no jarring changes in direction - I struggled with this in my first draft, so my teacher recommended using 'Janus sentences' (yup, the two-headed Roman god, that Janus). The first sentence of your paragraph should look back on what you said in your previous paragraph (the head of Janus that looks in the past) before describing what you're about to argue in this paragraph (the head of Janus facing the future). Similarly, the final sentence of your paragraph should look back and make an evaluating statement about what you've just argued, before detailing what you're going on to explain or argue in the next paragraph. This will mean your writing just flows in your reader's mind, making the experience of reading your essay more enjoyable and easy. I hope that made sense - it was a really helpful tool for me personally!
The presentation was my favourite part of the whole EPQ experience, I have so much to say about it! Your presentation should include the following:
- Why did you choose this topic - why is this an area of interest for you (both the subject and specific topic)? Why was this area of interest a good choice for an EPQ?
- How did you do your EPQ? Explain your method. How did you plan on answering your question (methodology)? How did you do research?
- What did you discover? Begin with background info (from the intro) and summarise main findings (about 2-3 from main body) and support ideas with some evidence (not too much detail). Summarise your conclusion and clearly state why your conclusion is justified.
- Review your EPQ journey - how successful do you think your project has been?
- Reflect. What went well? What could have been better? What do you wish you could have had time to explore that you didn’t? Times in the year where you didn’t spend your time wisely?
- Talk about what you gained from the project (skills, knowledge, experience). How might your project affect your future career/education?
Make your presentation engaging, but don't overwhelm your audience with music or excessive props. The only 'engaging' thing I really did was have photos (images of modern women in positions of power who are demonised) at the beginning of my presentation which I briefly discussed, before linking them to my project. Also, avoid using a PowerPoint. Usually, it's unnecessary - it takes away to attention from you and you might end up just reciting what was on the slides. I literally just had a slide with my title question and that was it. Your presentation should ideally last 10-15 minutes, with enough time for people to ask questions - the Q&A section is a really great way to pick up marks, whilst also being a lot of fun.
In terms of a literature review, its main focus is to briefly summarise the research done so far on this field you've chosen and to explicitly state a flaw in those sources or a 'gap' in this area of study which you will be addressing in this essay. So you can absolutely use the sources you've discussed in your main essay, so long as you're responding critically from them, and building on what they say to further your own argument.