Scroll to see replies
•
Go through my leases & licenses lectures — 1 - 2 hours [5/5 done — 6:15 am (1 hr 30 min)]
•
Download the relevant land law slides & make backups — 30-45 min
•
Make a content bank on ‘examinable areas’ /OR/ Make an outline & list of essential cases & statutes & Commission Reports for each topic and subtopics — 2 - 3 hours
•
Make 1 complete outline for Freehold Covenants — 3 - 4 hours
•
9 - 10 hours total.
•
Starting late in my first year exams (3/2/1 days before deadline with 0 knowledge on any 2 topics for the essays I’ve written; last year most were 2 essay questions to do per module for one submission)
•
Not bearing in mind any essay writing rules when panicking or distressed (to not have an argument/stance incorporated throughout the essay; not contrasting/comparing academics the proper way — no explanation given in any comparison; not citing the essential authorities/cases/statues that I needed to in my essays; to not have my personal opinion on each section; not being detailed or sufficiently knowledgeable in the essential/primary case judgements etc.; not using a proper structure in problem questions; and not giving each crucial sections of the essay equivalent & quality breadth and length; not using good examples/no examples/examples incorporated with purpose)
•
Submitted an essay late (68% downgraded to 58%)
•
Not doing equivalently well between 2/3 essays (65% in one, 58% in the other)
•
Choosing a question because the other one was boring but would have done better in (criminal law - got a 52% in the problem question, “not coherent with current case law” — i.e., not applying cases properly; statutes applied in the wrong order (after cases); used the CPS guide before cases or statute)
•
Wrong techniques
•
Not “critically discussing” but doing more ‘descriptions’ instead — relative amounts in an essay is what they look at
•
Had one 75% essay so I might have a rough idea on what to do
•
Starting my essays the moment I got/get them
•
Having a methodical approach this time — making the outlines/steps/questions I need to take in order to answer a problem question
•
Making/including a list of essential cases/statutes/authorities — so that I will always include them and not miss anything out
•
Making/including subheadings of topics so that I am not missing out any concepts to the best of my abilities
•
Ensuring that I have an actual stance/argument position throughout my essay
•
Use proper examples - a breadth of variety - engage with them - maximize them
•
Put “critical thinking” - making my own formulations in detail
•
Use search engines properly - e.g. Westlaw for articles with any mentions to the cases I’m looking into or descendant cases; a particular encyclopedia for Pub Int Law; google searches
•
Made a methodical approach to know when there is a ‘grey area’ in a problem question to engage more discussion
•
Realize I can easily do, cover and read essential judgements in a shorter time than I anticipated (previously was too intimidated)
•
To ensure that I am engaging with the essential arguments
•
Showing that I am aware of the backdrop/issues of what topic I need to talk about in my essay
•
Use the best of materials (good/very useful journal articles & firm articles & looking into case judgements & relevant authorities; commission reports)
•
Break down the essay question — what sub questions must I answer? What is my structure? Am I answering the question? Must make sure that I am clear of this and give full explanations as to why I’m doing this essay the way I am
•
Also use non-legal examples— policy examples; news - real incidents”
•
Attend a 9 pm (2 pm UK time) exam briefing for Pub Int Law
•
Attend an 11 pm (4 pm UK time) group re-capping for EU Law
•
Downloading all files necessary by today & backing them up
•
Print out problem questions for Tort
•
Practice “issue-spotting” on problem questions for Tort Law (look at each question and ask myself: what topic(s) does this question mainly concern about? Identify the parties. Then what their roles are; their reasons for their main cause of action (damage/if necessary), etc. What are the specific concepts that have arisen from the facts given, and can I pinpoint to exactly which specific fact does/did this?) — done
•
Make my list of topics and what sub-concepts that fall under each of them (Tort) — done, at 10:09 am
•
Mortgages (6 sections) ~ 4 hours — 4/6 done (12:50 am; took me a bit too long for my liking bcus I’m drowsy af) — 1 hour 15 min to finish F5 anf F6
•
Easements & Profits (6-7 sections) ~ 4 hours — y — 45 min (parts H1, H2a, H2b) - 1 hour 30 min (H3, H4, H5) - 1 hour 15/20 min (H6)
1.
Listening to the podcast (while writing very important points & noting down the authorities)
2.
...
Last reply 3 weeks ago
Got a third in my second year and the highest I’ve achieved in third year was 55%Last reply 3 weeks ago
Got a third in my second year and the highest I’ve achieved in third year was 55%