Curious- how many got ill after the covid vaccine

Note: this is not the thread to debate covid vaccines and wether people who don't want them are 'selfish and ignorant' or how people who do are 'gullible and spineless'

I'm curious as to how many of you got ill after the vaccine. I've had friends who were totally fine (apart from arm pain) both times and others who had to call in sick as they were very ill.

For me the first time round was ok but this second dose was awful, my arm pain was bad which made it difficult to get to sleep, then at 4am I woke up feverish and couldn't get back to sleep. I had a high temperature all day, incurable headache, fatigue (probably due to no sleep) and dizziness. Thankfully it was gone after two days but I've never gotten ill after a vaccine, only arm pain. I've never had a flu jab so I don't know if its virus vaccines that do this kind of thing or just the covid one.

I had chest pain, dizziness and pins and needles after the first one. The dizziness and pins and needles went away after about a week or two but the chest pain wouldn't budge until 3 weeks.

I ended up going to A&E after the link between the Pfizer vaccine and heart inflammation was made just to be safe and thankfully I was fine. I've since had the second one and had 0 side effects after that. It was odd

I've never had a flu jab so I don't know if its virus vaccines that do this kind of thing or just the covid one.

Clearly important to read the disclaimer on that data in the top left had corner of the page. Even they are very open about it being entirely unverified and the fact that it cannot be used to establish that a vaccine caused or contributed to any of the reported effects. It exists to spot trends essentially as an early warning sign that there may be a problem. In and of itself, it cannot establish either way if there actually is a problem.

It's a disclaimer warning that the data is open source and therefore not 100% accurate due to the fact that anyone can contribute and not all reports are verified. I am not telling you how to interpret the data just presenting it.

So, that's an admission that it's worthless from any kind of scientific perspective. Why present useless "data"???

You stating that a data set is 'useless' because it is open source doesn't make it so. I would not take it as empirical but, I would find it hard to believe that hundreds of thousands of people suddenly deiced to fabricate false reports all around the globe in the last 12 months. That is my interpretation of the data; how you choose to interpret it is down to you hence the disclaimer.

Then you are very innocent. Fabrication of "data" is a worldwide industry.

You stating that a data set is 'useless' because it is open source doesn't make it so. I would not take it as empirical but, I would find it hard to believe that hundreds of thousands of people suddenly deiced to fabricate false reports all around the globe in the last 12 months. That is my interpretation of the data; how you choose to interpret it is down to you hence the disclaimer.