I hate to say it mate but you've been sorely misled on how you can increase your odds at scoring a relationship with a woman. Going up to her on the street after a trip to the pub, complimenting her dress, and breathing beer-breath down her neck... that's not how you get into her panties!
The trick to that is getting to know her first (generally through something called "friendship") and then down the line, if you have a strong bond and get along really well, and mutually start to see each other romantically, you snag her. A few months after beginning the relationship, you can then weasel your pecker into her grill, hopefully that'll be the only grill you weasel it into unless you agree to an open relationship or some other form of polygamy.
See above. Word of advice: don't ask for introductions. Bit desperate imo: if your friend has a friend she thinks is a good match, she'll introduce you. I've introduced a few of my (male) friends to other (female) friends, with one of the couples (C&S) still dating 2 years on. If I knew my friend (say, Jack) was a desperate braggard who just wanted some pull, I wouldn't introduce him to one of my female friends: the man clearly wouldn't be worth a damn.
About the "hundreds of female friends," same point as above. Having 100's of friends close enough that they're all potential suitors, sharing a deep connection/etc with all of them? I'd think not. If you're after a short fling and getting some, that's the equivalent of trying your luck asking random girls on the street, which I would think is biased to favour women (what with the whole thirsty-guy problem as my good Tatering friend Gaddafi mentioned.)
You're assuming that the ratio of views of Male Dating Help Videos (MDHVs) to Female Dating Help Videos (FMHVs) being large instantly equates to a bias favouring women in the dating game across-the-board.
That's just a pure equality though: MDHVs > FMHVs. Whether or not that corroborates a real-world bias
for all men that puts them at a disadvantage in finding mates is a different story, though. If you were to assume that, you'd be assuming all sorts of equalities between men/women:
- equal representation in YouTube viewership (by gender)
- roughly equal age distribution (may skew viewing tendencies)
- roughly equivalent viewer psychology (see: both are equally likely to go to YouTube to get help with a relationship)
- all sorts more
Multitudinous factors come into play when doing a reduction of that sort with YouTube analytics and there's a reason that statisticians publish papers on reducing such data rather than just saying (X>Y and hence hypothesis D must be true, disproving the NH.)
And I'll have you know, wanting to **** a duck is a fetish that a lot of people likely have. "Cute" to us, sure, but not to them. You never know
About that forum thing, see the thing about X>Y hence D must be true, disproving the NH. It's the same thing: site visits instead of YT views. You'd need an equally rigorous reduction rather than the childish X>Y nonsense.
Yeah I'm glad they are allowed to say no. The plebeian boobs who go on YouTube for advice on how to score likely aren't of the finest stock, anyway