The Student Room Group

Geometric sequences help

https://gyazo.com/535bd4824e4543f5a7e689a8caf5f5a2
I got the nth term of this sequence but I'm not sure why the number of terms for the last question is 7, I took logs and got it but I'm still not convinced why considering the fact you can't take logs of negative numbers leading me to ignore the negative number?
Please help

Scroll to see replies

Reply 1
Original post by dwrfwrw
https://gyazo.com/535bd4824e4543f5a7e689a8caf5f5a2
I got the nth term of this sequence but I'm not sure why the number of terms for the last question is 7, I took logs and got it but I'm still not convinced why considering the fact you can't take logs of negative numbers leading me to ignore the negative number?
Please help

1 = 2^?
2 = 2^?
...
64 = 2^?
(edited 2 years ago)
Reply 2
Original post by mqb2766
64 = 2^?

Maybe I did something wrong but I got un=ar to the n-1
so therefore 64=-2 to the n-1
but you can't take logs of negative numbers...
i got un= -2 to the n-1 which is right
(edited 2 years ago)
Reply 3
Original post by dwrfwrw
Maybe I did something wrong but I got un=ar to the n-1
so therefore 64=-2 to the n-1
but you can't take logs of negative numbers...

You should know a doubling 2 sequence without taking logs?
So what power of 2 equals 64.
(edited 2 years ago)
Reply 4
Original post by mqb2766
You should know a doubling 2 sequence without taking logs?
So what power of 2 equals 64.

Yeah it's 6?
I know the sequence is doubling but why did you ignore the minus sign?
idk if this works but I tried setting equation of Un to the last term of 64..
(edited 2 years ago)
Reply 5
Original post by dwrfwrw
Yeah it's 6?

Of course and that is the n-1 term so n=7.
Reply 6
Original post by mqb2766
Of course and that is the n-1 term so n=7.

sorry to annoy you again but I know the sequnce is doubling but why did you ignore the minus again? just wanna clear this up
Reply 7
Original post by dwrfwrw
sorry to annoy you again but I know the sequnce is doubling but why did you ignore the minus again? just wanna clear this up

The negative sign occurs when n=2,4,6,... You know r is -2 and the sequence is (-2)^(n-1). The next term would be -128 which would correspond to (-2)^7 so n=8.

What role does the - sign have?
(edited 2 years ago)
Reply 8
Original post by mqb2766
The negative sign occurs when n=2,4,6,... You know r is -2 and the sequence is
(-2)^(n-1)
The next term would be -128 which would correspond to (-2)^7

Okay, thank you for your help I understood it now, thank you
Reply 9
Original post by mqb2766
1 = 2^?
2 = 2^?
...
64 = 2^?

Another unrelated question,https://gyazo.com/f7f4f586fbe793f267a91b46ceda23f9
am not sure what to do in this question.
I did integral between (f(x)-g(x) where f(x)=graph above, so do I just take the area between 0 and 2?
Does this seem ok?

I got my integral to be 6x-2e to the x/2 - e to the x)
Original post by dwrfwrw
Another unrelated question,https://gyazo.com/f7f4f586fbe793f267a91b46ceda23f9
am not sure what to do in this question.
I did integral between (f(x)-g(x) where f(x)=graph above, so do I just take the area between 0 and 2?
Does this seem ok?

I got my integral to be 6x-2e to the x/2 - e to the x)

Think you have the right idea, you want to integrate the difference of the curves from x = 0 up until the intersection point. The intersection point is not 2 however.
Upload a pic of your working if you want more detailed help. Thanks.
Reply 11
Original post by mqb2766
Think you have the right idea, you want to integrate the difference of the curves from x = 0 up until the intersection point. The intersection point is not 2 however.
Upload a pic of your working if you want more detailed help. Thanks.

I redone the factorising bit and let x= e to the x/2 and got a quadratic in x and still got x=-3 and x=2?
Original post by dwrfwrw
I redone the factorising bit and let x= e to the x/2 and got a quadratic in x and still got x=-3 and x=2?

Can you pls try and upload your working in an image.
e^2
and
6 - e^1
are different. I guess you've done a disguised quadratic and forgot to map back to the original x variable. I guess youve used x for both the original and transformed variables and got confused.
(edited 2 years ago)
Reply 13
Original post by mqb2766
Can you pls try and upload your working in an image.
e^2
and
6 - e^1
are different. I guess you've done a disguised quadratic and forgot to map back to the original x variable. I guess youve used x for both the original and transformed variables and got confused.

oh i figured it out yea i got confused,
i got x=2In(2)
Original post by dwrfwrw
oh i figured it out yea i got confused,
i got x=2In(2)

I presume youve checked this time, so just finish it off. Can you pls try and upload full working in an image in future. Its much easier to give help.
Reply 15
Original post by mqb2766
I presume youve checked this time, so just finish it off. Can you pls try and upload full working in an image in future. Its much easier to give help.

sure only problem is that my phone is shared with my mom so it might be a bit awkward but ill definitely do that next time
Reply 16
think i confused myself again.. ill send a pic of my work

Original post by mqb2766
I presume youve checked this time, so just finish it off. Can you pls try and upload full working in an image in future. Its much easier to give help.
(edited 2 years ago)
Reply 17
IMG_20220125_211123.jpg
Reply 18
Original post by mqb2766
I presume youve checked this time, so just finish it off. Can you pls try and upload full working in an image in future. Its much easier to give help.

think i need help again aaa
Your integral is correct as are the limits. Youve just make some simple mistakes evaluating the definite integral when you sub the limits in. Just write it out more carefully. Note
e^ln(z) = z
as well and think about the form of the desired answer for the first ln() term.
(edited 2 years ago)

Quick Reply

Latest