Hey there! Sign in to join this conversationNew here? Join for free
    Offline

    15
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by james1211)
    I don't like this at all. There are psychological issues at play here. A baby is programmed to be with it's mother when it's young. Who will breastfeed it too?
    What psychological issues are those, then?
    Offline

    0
    ReputationRep:
    How is it disturbing?

    I think they'll be good parents because they are serious about the child. They shouldn't be denied the right to children becaues of the opinion that it's "abnormal". The main priority is the well-being of the child.
    Offline

    2
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by derma2019)
    There is a reason why two men can not naturally conceive and two women cannot naturally conceive. simples.
    Sometimes a man and a woman can't naturally conceive. What's your point?
    Offline

    0
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by Xcalibur)
    What, are you arguing that men can conceive with other men?
    Nope. That you should prove that someone up there did indeed "design" it to be that way or was it just a process in which no deity had any involvement, as is logical.
    Offline

    15
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by Ragnaroklepourfe)
    gross and disgusting I hope the social workers take the kid away from them...
    On what grounds would they be removing the child, exactly?
    Offline

    17
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by Sanctimonious)
    Because its fundamentally wrong to separate a newborn and their mother unless the mother rejects them as is sometimes the case in nature too.



    Its only a naturalistic fallacy to you as you're too narrow minded to accept other peoples views. This has further been proven in this thread where you've called other posters ********s just for not sharing your viewpoint.

    I can't believe you think it is fine to separate a child and mother at birth to be honest. If the mother is not rejecting the child what reason is there to deprive the child of experiencing the maternal bond?

    You seem happy to deprive a child of this to further societal advancements and appease others. I find that disturbingly tragic.
    So it's 'wrong' but you won't say why it's wrong, and then say I'm narrow minded.

    Nice.
    Offline

    17
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by stargirl63)
    So will yours. But I already pointed that out.

    P.S - LOL
    CONGRATULATIONS!
    You (somehow) missed the obvious post that all posts will be 'incomplete' in some way.
    Offline

    2
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by Freudian Slip)
    However, the child is, almost always, (depending on the circumstances of their birth), placed onto the bare chest of their mother. This skin-to-skin contact or so-called 'Kangaroo Care' has moved forwards in popularity in recent times, there's any number of articles related to its benefits online.

    Define 'normal couple'? :lolwut:
    Normal as in not homosexual...what's not to understand?
    Offline

    15
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by SarcasticMel)
    Normal as in not homosexual...what's not to understand?
    Arguably, there is no such thing as a 'normal couple', even amongst heterosexual people.
    Offline

    1
    ReputationRep:
    Horrible and disgusting, makes me feel physically sick.
    Offline

    3
    ReputationRep:
    It's difficult to remember we live in 2014 when some people can still hold such pathetic and outdated views, we're all human beings, we're all equal, we all deserve the same rights. Shut the **** up and respect others for what they are.
    • Study Helper
    Offline

    11
    ReputationRep:
    Why.. Why are they naked?
    Offline

    17
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by Melon girl)
    Why.. Why are they naked?
    Why.. Why can't you read?
    Offline

    2
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by Lontttt530)
    I am all for gay rights, but this will effect the kids mental state when he/she older
    Stop spouting nonsense. What evidence have you got that the child will grow up with an affected mental state. The only thing that can possibly affect the child, is critical and judgemental views from the likes of you of the two important people he/she will come to love as he/she matures.

    People used the same argument for single parenthood back in the 60s when divorce was made easier to access, but well loved children from single parent families do not grow up any worse than from two hetro parents and society has not collapsed as a result.
    Offline

    17
    ReputationRep:
    Guys, can we please have less of the harmful generalisations that don't add to debate. And if someone insults you, please report it, don't respond.
    Offline

    0
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by WitnessMO)
    Stop spouting nonsense. What evidence have you got that the child will grow up with an affected mental state. The only thing that can possibly affect the child, is critical and judgemental views from the likes of you of the two important people he/she will come to love as he/she matures.

    People used the same argument for single parenthood back in the 60s when divorce was made easier to access, but well loved children from single parent families do not grow up any worse than from two hetro parents and society has not collapsed as a result.
    Go get a education, yes single parers kids especially boys underachieve and more likely to go jail than kids from married parents. you ignorant fool what planet are you on? We spend millions picking up the pieces of dysfunctional kids from single parents families.
    Offline

    17
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by minimarshmallow)
    Guys, can we please have less of the harmful generalisations that don't add to debate. And if someone insults you, please report it, don't respond.
    So long as we can agree all homophobes are bigots .
    Offline

    17
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by there's too much love)
    CONGRATULATIONS!
    You (somehow) missed the obvious post that all posts will be 'incomplete' in some way.
    Not all posts surely?

    I guess that's the idea of a discussion/debate - there's always another point to consider or another topic/piece of evidence etc.
    Offline

    2
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by Lontttt530)
    Go get a education, yes single parers kids especially boys underachieve and more likely to go jail than kids from married parents. you ignorant fool what planet are you on? We spend millions picking up the pieces of dysfunctional kids from single parents families.
    lol, as if dysfunctional kids can't come from nuclear families. Even if children from single family household are more likely to be underachievers or end up in jail, this rarely has nothing to do with the fact that they are one parent less but other factors such as poverty, the area they live in (i.e. council housing) and bad schools and role modelling. Single parent families are more likely to be under the poverty line and this can be impact on education and make crime more likely. But I doubt a middle-class single parent family raising her/his child in the same environment as a wealthier middle-class nuclear family does any worse job.
    Offline

    16
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by Sanctimonious)
    Its a natural right, like the right to life. Taking a child from its biological mother is disgusting. Doing the same to animals like dogs is equally disgusting.

    The very fact you or anyone want to deny a child or baby animal the love of its true biological mother is disgusting.
    Shall I mention this ridiculous notion to my adoptive parents
 
 
 
  • See more of what you like on The Student Room

    You can personalise what you see on TSR. Tell us a little about yourself to get started.

  • Poll
    What newspaper do you read/prefer?
    Useful resources
  • See more of what you like on The Student Room

    You can personalise what you see on TSR. Tell us a little about yourself to get started.

  • The Student Room, Get Revising and Marked by Teachers are trading names of The Student Room Group Ltd.

    Register Number: 04666380 (England and Wales), VAT No. 806 8067 22 Registered Office: International House, Queens Road, Brighton, BN1 3XE

    Quick reply
    Reputation gems: You get these gems as you gain rep from other members for making good contributions and giving helpful advice.