Hey there! Sign in to join this conversationNew here? Join for free
    Offline

    20
    (Original post by IrrationalRoot)
    I don't mind complex numbers even though it's not my strongest topic, but a lot of the time they're paired up with vectors so I don't do them.
    Things like III 2013 Q6 are fine though .
    I will forgive you

    But personally, I find complex numbers to be the most enjoyable parts of STEP

    (Although I will admit that I would realistically skip one if, by a brief analysis, it looked magnitudes too complex for me, there is after all a limit to what I can do)
    Offline

    3
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by drandy76)
    Afaik they're meant to be of similar difficulty, someone correct me if I'm wrong


    Posted from TSR Mobile
    I find step 3 easier than step 2 but yeah they're supposed to be similar in difficulty haha

    Posted from TSR Mobile
    Online

    14
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by krishdesai7)
    Is it just me, or is STEP 3 a whole order of magnitude tougher than STEP 2. I didy first mock today, and ooh, it was a whole new ballgame
    More difficult questions (at least content wise), but lower grade boundaries (so it should be about as difficult to get a 1).
    Offline

    5
    ReputationRep:
    who r u if u find ii harder than iii can we swap please
    Offline

    2
    ReputationRep:
    Well, I have nothing against them personally - I have just heard that the paper was overflowing with them.
    Offline

    2
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by fa991)
    I find step 3 easier than step 2 but yeah they're supposed to be similar in difficulty haha

    Posted from TSR Mobile
    I agree - I think STEP 3 can be a bit intimidating at first sight but it seems to me as though a lot of the questions don't actually require much work once you get them and complex numbers questions, though intimidating perhaps, can be very easy.
    Offline

    2
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by Mathemagicien)
    I will forgive you

    But personally, I find complex numbers to be the most enjoyable parts of STEP

    (Although I will admit that I would realistically skip one if it, by a brief analysis, it looked magnitudes too complex for me, there is after all a limit to what I can do)
    Ugh, the last sentence - I am kind of hoping it wasn't on purpose and it is just all the maths slowly leaking out from all this STEP prep.
    Offline

    20
    (Original post by tridianprime)
    Ugh, the last sentence - I am kind of hoping it wasn't on purpose and it is just all the maths slowly leaking out from all this STEP prep.
    STEP can induce all sorts of un-natural maths to become integral to one's vocabulary. I cannot now differentiate between mathematical language and pleb talk. STEP probably changes your brain a mean deal - mine deviates a lot from its standard state - although the changes tend to be limited to only some areas.

    Tangentially speaking, it is quite interesting how many people say they find STEP III easier than STEP II.
    Online

    17
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by Mathemagicien)
    STEP can induce all sorts of un-natural maths to become integral to one's vocabulary. I cannot now differentiate between mathematical language and pleb talk. STEP probably changes your brain a mean deal - mine deviates a lot from its standard state - although the changes tend to be limited to only some areas.

    Tangentially speaking, it is quite interesting how many people say they find STEP III easier than STEP II.
    "Tangentially speaking"

    No. That's not ok.
    Offline

    20
    (Original post by IrrationalRoot)
    "Tangentially speaking"

    No. That's not ok.
    Its not a normal way to speak, is it?
    Online

    17
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by Mathemagicien)
    Its not a normal way to speak, is it?
    No it's not lol, I think you should speak normally instead.
    Offline

    20
    (Original post by IrrationalRoot)
    No it's not lol, I think you should speak normally instead.
    I don't mean to be obtuse, but don't you think its acute way of speaking?

    I derive satisfaction from it
    Online

    17
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by Mathemagicien)
    I don't mean to be obtuse, but don't you think its acute way of speaking?

    I derive satisfaction from it
    I was going to make a derivative pun but I think you've used every differential calculus term I know...
    Offline

    20
    (Original post by IrrationalRoot)
    I was going to make a derivative pun but I think you've used every differential calculus term I know...
    I imagine that there are plenty of really good calculus terms just waiting fourierly good puns
    Online

    17
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by Mathemagicien)
    I imagine that there are plenty of really good calculus terms just waiting fourierly good puns
    Wow it's like the name was Taylor-made for that pun.
    Offline

    6
    ReputationRep:
    I have a friend that thought the series in Q3 II 2016 was e^x. He was convinced the question was very easy. RIP.


    Posted from TSR Mobile
    Online

    14
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by jjsnyder)
    I have a friend that thought the series in Q3 II 2016 was e^x. He was convinced the question was very easy. RIP.


    Posted from TSR Mobile
    That's the case where n=infinity, so it basically is the same as doing all the individual cases of non-infinite n. Full marks ez
    Online

    17
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by jjsnyder)
    I have a friend that thought the series in Q3 II 2016 was e^x. He was convinced the question was very easy. RIP.


    Posted from TSR Mobile
    Ouch. How did he even do the first part though, if the series was extended to infinity the first result wouldn't be valid?
    Offline

    2
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by jjsnyder)
    I have a friend that thought the series in Q3 II 2016 was e^x. He was convinced the question was very easy. RIP.


    Posted from TSR Mobile
    It is an approximation to e^x. I thought the same way as him for a few minutes, and was confused why they wanted me to prove such a trivial result lol. Then, I realised that it was up to n, so I went on with the question haha.


    Posted from TSR Mobile
    Offline

    6
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by IrrationalRoot)
    Ouch. How did he even do the first part though, if the series was extended to infinity the first result wouldn't be valid?
    This is what I thought to myself, clearly he is a wizard.


    Posted from TSR Mobile
 
 
 
  • See more of what you like on The Student Room

    You can personalise what you see on TSR. Tell us a little about yourself to get started.

  • Poll
    Have you ever participated in a Secret Santa?
  • See more of what you like on The Student Room

    You can personalise what you see on TSR. Tell us a little about yourself to get started.

  • The Student Room, Get Revising and Marked by Teachers are trading names of The Student Room Group Ltd.

    Register Number: 04666380 (England and Wales), VAT No. 806 8067 22 Registered Office: International House, Queens Road, Brighton, BN1 3XE

    Quick reply
    Reputation gems: You get these gems as you gain rep from other members for making good contributions and giving helpful advice.