Hey there! Sign in to join this conversationNew here? Join for free
x Turn on thread page Beta
    • Community Assistant
    • Very Important Poster
    Offline

    20
    ReputationRep:
    Community Assistant
    Very Important Poster
    (Original post by Student403)
    That's C1 is it not?

    Sn of an arithmetic series is n/2 (a + l) where a = 1 and l = n
    Yup
    Offline

    18
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by Windowswind123)
    Do you need to do either FP2 or FP3 for FM?
    Yes. Either FP2 or FP3, sorry should have said. So you'd have FP1, FP2, whatever else, and your 3 "A2 modules" could be M2, S2, M3

    (Original post by Kvothe the arcane)
    Pretty sure it's a c4 integral.
    It is indeed
    Offline

    0
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by Windowswind123)
    Wait... FP2 isn't required to be an A2 module?
    I could use M3, S2 and M2?
    If so, praise baby jesus.
    Yeah you can use those, as long as it is 270 UMS in 3 A2 units you're ok!
    Offline

    2
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by Student403)
    That's C1 is it not?

    Sn of an arithmetic series is n/2 (a + l) where a = 1 and l = n
    Yeah, so even less reason to complain haha
    Offline

    1
    ReputationRep:
    Given the grade boundaries in the previous few years for fp2, and considering the fact this paper was relatively tough, I'd say the grade boundaries will be around 68-69 for an A* and 63-64 for an A.
    Offline

    2
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by EricPiphany)
    Lol, I found it quite tough. I get overly nervous during exams.
    I'm so glad I've seen this (I was afraid of posting on the Cambridge offer holders thread around mathmos) because I too get nervous in exams and FP2 was no exception. I spent a good long time hyperventilating from question 4 and managed to finish the paper but did no way near as well as I could have done :-/
    Offline

    2
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by Ayman!)
    Cheers! Agree with all of yours, I think I'm looking at around 71-ish.
    Is that all wrong in question 2?
    Attached Images
     
    Offline

    18
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by PhysicsIP2016)
    I'm so glad I've seen this (I was afraid of posting on the Cambridge offer holders thread around mathmos) because I too get nervous in exams and FP2 was no exception. I spent a good long time hyperventilating from question 4 and managed to finish the paper but did no way near as well as I could have done :-/
    Unlucky It happens but it tripped many people up so well done on finishing
    Offline

    2
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by Student403)
    Unlucky It happens but it tripped many people up so well done on finishing
    Cheers It's a shame because I have been getting 74-75 in my past few FP2 mocks but I think the pressures of the exam (along with it being more difficult this year) got to me
    Offline

    8
    That integral is standard. Had to be said.
    Offline

    18
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by PhysicsIP2016)
    Cheers It's a shame because I have been getting 74-75 in my past few FP2 mocks but I think the pressures of the exam (along with it being more difficult this year) got to me
    Happens to me in every exam lol - I know what you mean
    Offline

    8
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by Naeco)
    I guess the grade boundarie won't be very low... Most question was pretty standard except the question about dy/d(theta)+2y=sin(theta)

    The polar might be a bit tricky but it is not extremely hard, the second order differentiation question is very similar to the 2015 june one so I guess many people should be already aware of that

    And there are many proof question which is easy to get all the mark...

    I guess the A* grade boundarie will be about 70-69 since I checked the previous paper's grade boundaries, 2015 was 71, 2014 and 2013 were 70 and 2012 was 69, the A* grade boundarie will definitely not be lower than 68

    Good luck to everyone's FP3, their grade boundary was aboslutely low lol
    Summation was a little nonstandard in my opinion, having to spit the summation into three and then evaluate separately won't be intuitively obvious for everyone
    Offline

    8
    (Original post by PhysicsIP2016)
    I'm so glad I've seen this (I was afraid of posting on the Cambridge offer holders thread around mathmos) because I too get nervous in exams and FP2 was no exception. I spent a good long time hyperventilating from question 4 and managed to finish the paper but did no way near as well as I could have done :-/
    Tbh a lot of good students feel this way.
    Offline

    8
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by Marxist)
    That integral is standard. Had to be said.
    Depends. It takes a little experience to realise that a second iteration of IBP would do the trick I think
    Offline

    3
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by AlexFrangos)
    Is that all wrong in question 2?
    Looks fine to me! I found the crit values and then sketched a graph to see where the inequality would lie. I got the same answer, though.

    Sent from my SM-G920I using Tapatalk
    Offline

    2
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by Ayman!)
    Looks fine to me! I found the crit values and then sketched a graph to see where the inequality would lie. I got the same answer, though.

    Sent from my SM-G920I using Tapatalk
    At first i also sketched the graph and found the solution from there but i didnt know if that was correct since the question said to use algebra to solve the inequality.
    Offline

    8
    (Original post by Euclidean)
    Depends. It takes a little experience to realise that a second iteration of IBP would do the trick I think
    Agreed but you'd think a lot of FP2 students would know this. IBP twice is quite common, no? I l'm an AS student but doing a bit of calculus helps solve these types.
    Offline

    2
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by Marxist)
    Tbh a lot of good students feel this way.
    Definitely, particularly because lots aim for 100% as well (I was but now there is no way that's happening!)
    Offline

    22
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by Euclidean)
    Depends. It takes a little experience to realise that a second iteration of IBP would do the trick I think
    To be fair there were other methods you could consider as well:

    - use a PI/CF method on the first order ODE
    - differentiate and then use a PI/CF method on the resulting second order ODE
    - write sine in its exponential form
    - realise the integrand is the imaginary part of e^(2+i)x.
    - double IBP
    Offline

    8
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by Marxist)
    Agreed but you'd think a lot of FP2 students would know this. IBP twice is quite common, no? I l'm an AS student but doing a bit of calculus helps solve these types.
    Maybe, I remember using it in STEP questions but never in A-Level. Anyhow, shoulda done the trick with the grade boundaries
 
 
 
Reply
Submit reply
Turn on thread page Beta
Updated: February 24, 2017
Poll
Do I go to The Streets tomorrow night?

The Student Room, Get Revising and Marked by Teachers are trading names of The Student Room Group Ltd.

Register Number: 04666380 (England and Wales), VAT No. 806 8067 22 Registered Office: International House, Queens Road, Brighton, BN1 3XE

Write a reply...
Reply
Hide
Reputation gems: You get these gems as you gain rep from other members for making good contributions and giving helpful advice.