AQA PHYA4 ~ 13th June 2013 ~ A2 PhysicsWatch

Announcements
6 years ago
#201
(Original post by bobthebuilder)
yeah that's all you need to remember
wow thats so contradicting :O but i guess i will just remember that
0
6 years ago
#202
(Original post by bobthebuilder)
i dont know if this is close to the right answer, probably not, but ill say what i done LOL they give the diameter of the coil, and we know that the area of a circle is so if you sub in the value of D that they have given you can find out the area A, now they are asking for magnetic flux which is they have given B and we worked out A, and since its perpendicular to the magnetic field then we get maximum flux and minimum emf, so thats first question done, now next it asks for flux linkage after its rotate 90 degrees, this means now the emf is maximum (parallel to field lines) and flux is minimum so the change in flux is actually the original value of flux (going from original value at max flux [90degrees] to 0 at min flux [0degrees] and then you would times by 'N' since they are asking for flux linkage THATS WHAT I THINK. for third part you would then put the calculated flux linkage and divide by the time given in the question.

if what i have said is correct, the answers should be

a) Wb

b)i) Wb turns

b)ii) 4.91 V

???????!!!!!! please be right 0
6 years ago
#203
(Original post by masryboy94)
wow thats so contradicting :O but i guess i will just remember that
well.. not really,just try to get this:

the direction of current flow is the OPPOSITE of the direction of electron flow.

so when you're working force on an electron, you would do the opposite of what you would do on current..

or remembering what you said before if all you need!
0
6 years ago
#204
(Original post by bobthebuilder)
well.. not really,just try to get this:

the direction of current flow is the OPPOSITE of the direction of electron flow.

so when you're working force on an electron, you would do the opposite of what you would do on current..

or remembering what you said before if all you need!
but in the book they say the electric current in a wire is the flow of negatively charged electrons, is it badly worded from them?

Edit: is conventional current, in the opposite direction of electrons and current in the direction of electrons?
0
6 years ago
#205
(Original post by masryboy94)
but in the book they say the electric current in a wire is the flow of negatively charged electrons, is it badly worded from them?

Edit: is conventional current, in the opposite direction of electrons and current in the direction of electrons?
nope, current flow is in the opposite direction of electron flow.
if you think of a simple circuit, it shows the direction of current flow from positive terminal to negative terminal.
but electrons actually flows from negative terminal ( its repelled by the negative charge) to the positive terminal (attracted by the positive charge)
0
6 years ago
#206
(Original post by bobthebuilder)
nope, current flow is in the opposite direction of electron flow.
if you think of a simple circuit, it shows the direction of current flow from positive terminal to negative terminal.
but electrons actually flows from negative terminal ( its repelled by the negative charge) to the positive terminal (attracted by the positive charge)
ahh okay makes sense, the book really confused me !! ... btw i tried answering your question earlier, not sure atall if im right ... which paper was it form? .... thanks btw 0
6 years ago
#207
(Original post by masryboy94)
ahh okay makes sense, the book really confused me !! ... btw i tried answering your question earlier, not sure atall if im right ... which paper was it form? .... thanks btw oh i know how to do part a but I'm stuck on b and c. its a really old paper so i gave up, you can try it if you want to:

http://www.school-portal.co.uk/Group...ourceId=182553

it's question 4
0
6 years ago
#208
(Original post by bobthebuilder)
oh i know how to do part a but I'm stuck on b and c. its a really old paper so i gave up, you can try it if you want to:

http://www.school-portal.co.uk/Group...ourceId=182553

it's question 4
yaay got it right !! .... i explained it to you on a previous post? scroll up and you will see it

edit: it asks for flux linkage after its rotate 90 degrees, this means now the emf is maximum (parallel to field lines) and flux is minimum so the change in flux is actually the original value of flux (going from original value at max flux [90degrees] to 0 at min flux [0degrees] and then you would times by 'N' since they are asking for flux linkage. for second part of b) you would then put the calculated flux linkage and divide by the time given in the question.
0
6 years ago
#209
(Original post by masryboy94)
i dont know if this is close to the right answer, probably not, but ill say what i done LOL they give the diameter of the coil, and we know that the area of a circle is so if you sub in the value of D that they have given you can find out the area A,now they are asking for magnetic flux which is they have given B and we worked out A, and since its perpendicular to the magnetic field then we get maximum flux and minimum emf, so thats first question done, now next it asks for flux linkage after its rotate 90 degrees, this means now the emf is maximum (parallel to field lines) and flux is minimum so the change in flux is actually the original value of flux (going from original value at max flux [90degrees] to 0 at min flux [0degrees] and then you would times by 'N' since they are asking for flux linkage THATS WHAT I THINK. for third part you would then put the calculated flux linkage and divide by the time given in the question.

if what i have said is correct, the answers should be

a) Wb

b)i) Wb turns

b)ii) 4.91 V

???????!!!!!! please be right okay that makes sense thanks i did't see your answer before,i though people just ignored me

so originally it was perpendicular, and it was changed by 90 degrees so its parallel.
so the change is flux is equal to the original value of flux, but why is emf maximum when its parallel, shouldn't it be minimum?
0
6 years ago
#210
(Original post by bobthebuilder)
okay that makes sense thanks i did't see your answer before,i though people just ignored me

so originally it was perpendicular, and it was changed by 90 degrees so its parallel.
so the change is flux is equal to the original value of flux, but why is emf maximum when its parallel, shouldn't it be minimum?
for a good few months i usto ask exact same question, but now i understood it, it would be so much easier to explain it if you were infront of me, but since im not, all you need to remember is that when you get maximum flux (90degrees to the magnetic field) you get minimum emf and vice versa. so basically emf and flux always do the opposite, unless in the special case the coil is 45degrees to the magnetic field, there you get them equal eachother.
0
6 years ago
#211
(Original post by bobthebuilder)
okay that makes sense thanks i did't see your answer before,i though people just ignored me

so originally it was perpendicular, and it was changed by 90 degrees so its parallel.
so the change is flux is equal to the original value of flux, but why is emf maximum when its parallel, shouldn't it be minimum?
emf is maximum when the flux through the coil is 0, i.e. when the coil is parallel to the field lines, because at this point the rate of change of flux is at a maximum (and that is equal to emf).
0
6 years ago
#212
(Original post by masryboy94)
for a good few months i usto ask exact same question, but now i understood it, it would be so much easier to explain it if you were infront of me, but since im not, all you need to remember is that when you get maximum flux (90degrees to the magnetic field) you get minimum emf and vice versa. so basically emf and flux always do the opposite, unless in the special case the coil is 45degrees to the magnetic field, there you get them equal eachother.

(Original post by jonnyb123)
emf is maximum when the flux through the coil is 0, i.e. when the coil is parallel to the field lines, because at this point the rate of change of flux is at a maximum (and that is equal to emf).
omg I am SO confused.
is it just me or do you both contradict each other?

is this very important, because i could've got the answer to that question without knowing all this minimum/maximum thing, right?
0
6 years ago
#213
(Original post by bobthebuilder)
omg I am SO confused.
is it just me or do you both contradict each other?

is this very important, because i could've got the answer to that question without knowing all this minimum/maximum thing, right?
how? me and him basically said the same thing but in different terms lool
0
6 years ago
#214
(Original post by masryboy94)
how? me and him basically said the same thing but in different terms lool
yeah i figured, it was just me reading it wrong!
so i'll just remember emf is max when is parallel. and min when perpendicular?
0
6 years ago
#215
(Original post by bobthebuilder)
yeah i figured, it was just me reading it wrong!
so i'll just remember emf is max when is parallel. and min when perpendicular?
yepp
0
6 years ago
#216
(Original post by bobthebuilder)
omg I am SO confused.
is it just me or do you both contradict each other?

is this very important, because i could've got the answer to that question without knowing all this minimum/maximum thing, right?
If your really having difficulties understanding it, since there's limited time I'd say just at least look at this formula and understand how it works...

emf induced = BANcos(angle)

when coil is perpendicular to magnetic field (or 90 degrees to it)... cos(90)=0
Therefore emf induced = 0

However when it's parallel to the magnetic field (0 degrees to it)...
cos(0) = 1

As you may know this is the maximum value of cos... emf induced is maximum here 1
6 years ago
#217
(Original post by posthumus)
If your really having difficulties understanding it, since there's limited time I'd say just at least look at this formula and understand how it works...

emf induced = BANcos(angle)

when coil is perpendicular to magnetic field (or 90 degrees to it)... cos(90)=0
Therefore emf induced = 0

However when it's parallel to the magnetic field (0 degrees to it)...
cos(0) = 1

As you may know this is the maximum value of cos... emf induced is maximum here that really does help to remember it, thank you! 0
6 years ago
#218
Hi guys, for the nelsons thornes book on page 58 for summary questions 3ai is the answer in the back of the book wrong?

Because surely you do the change in V from the big mass?

I got 50J, 100J and a 100j

but the answer is 250j, 200j and 200j

0
6 years ago
#219
(Original post by ladynova)
Hi guys, for the nelsons thornes book on page 58 for summary questions 3ai is the answer in the back of the book wrong?

Because surely you do the change in V from the big mass?

I got 50J, 100J and a 100j

but the answer is 250j, 200j and 200j

i think because they are the equipotentials, at P the gravitational potential is set at 2500kg-1 so that is what it has at that position, it doesn't say the object moved from the body to position P, but rather it says gravitational potential energy straight at P. hope you get that?
0
6 years ago
#220
I still dont get why the jan 13 paper was SO much harder than all others yet same boundaries.

Posted from TSR Mobile
0
X

new posts Back
to top
Latest
My Feed

Oops, nobody has postedin the last few hours.

Why not re-start the conversation?

see more

See more of what you like onThe Student Room

You can personalise what you see on TSR. Tell us a little about yourself to get started.

University open days

• Cardiff Metropolitan University
Undergraduate Open Day - Llandaff Campus Undergraduate
Sat, 19 Oct '19
• Coventry University
Sat, 19 Oct '19
• University of Birmingham
Sat, 19 Oct '19

Poll

Join the discussion

Why wouldn't you turn to teachers if you were being bullied?

They might tell my parents (23)
6.74%
They might tell the bully (33)
9.68%
I don't think they'd understand (52)
15.25%
It might lead to more bullying (131)
38.42%
There's nothing they could do (102)
29.91%