Hey there! Sign in to join this conversationNew here? Join for free
x Turn on thread page Beta

Court stops circumcision. watch

Announcements
    Offline

    3
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by Youngmetro)
    http://www.telegraph.co.uk/men/activ...-with-FGM.html

    http://www.ibtimes.co.uk/why-female-...cision-1486805

    Two things, first is that your comparing the two is invalid. Refer to the two articles plus the 100 other ones that say it isnt a valid comparison to make.

    Second, a circumcised vagina aint even aesthetically pleasing.
    I precisely didn't compare circumcision with FGM - removal of the clitoris. I compared it with the removal of inner labia - called nymphoplasty.

    (Original post by Josb)
    Yeah, I think we should do the same to girls, because vaginas are more aesthetically pleasing when the inner labia don't stick outside.
    Learn to read. :bootyshake:
    Offline

    18
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by Josb)
    I precisely didn't compare circumcision with FGM - removal of the clitoris. I compared it with the removal of inner labia - called nymphoplasty.



    Learn to read. :bootyshake:
    Glad there are sane people on the site
    Offline

    15
    (Original post by cherryred90s)
    What a comparison :laugh:
    I know.
    Offline

    2
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by AperfectBalance)
    Ok so if a majority of people think something is right it is?

    I assume you think that gays should be stoned or people who leave the faith should be killed? Since more Muslims think this than not
    Im not a muslim.

    Stop making vague comments like that. I've already justified with good reason why it is right, reply to that first before suggesting it is unjustified.
    Offline

    15
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by Youngmetro)
    http://www.telegraph.co.uk/men/activ...-with-FGM.html

    http://www.ibtimes.co.uk/why-female-...cision-1486805

    Two things, first is that you comparing the two is invalid. Refer to the two articles plus the 100 other ones that say it isnt a valid comparison to make.

    Second, a circumcised vagina aint even aesthetically pleasing.
    you like labia/ big labia?
    Offline

    3
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by queen-bee)
    female general mutilation is disgusting and used to oppress and abuse women so they can't enjoy sex,how are you comparing it to male circumcision?
    Male circumcision developed to prevent boys from masturbating. I'd say it's perfectly sensible to compare it to FGM.
    Offline

    2
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by Josb)
    I precisely didn't compare circumcision with FGM - removal of the clitoris. I compared it with the removal of inner labia - called nymphoplasty.



    Learn to read. :bootyshake:
    It isnt done for religious reason, only for practical purposes. Its also very rare too.

    Hence, it is still invalid.
    Offline

    18
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by Youngmetro)
    Im not a muslim.

    Stop making vague comments like that. I've already justified with good reason why it is right, reply to that first before suggesting it is unjustified.
    Ok so for cleanliness It hardly improves it, I mean in these modern days Most people wash regularly, in countries like America and Uk.
    Stds. we have condoms, and even without the benefits are negligible Look at the nhs studies and others.

    Never said you were a Muslim, but by your logic you agree that it is ok for them to do that
    Offline

    2
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by AperfectBalance)
    Ok so for cleanliness It hardly improves it, I mean in these modern days Most people wash regularly, in countries like America and Uk.
    Stds. we have condoms, and even without the benefits are negligible Look at the nhs studies and others.

    Never said you were a Muslim, but by your logic you agree that it is ok for them to do that
    It does cause complications, search it for yourself. It still holds the risk of disease etc etc. On that basis, it is still more practical. Therefore when an adult makes the decision on that premise then it is perfectly fine and justified.

    STDs, well if everyone wore condoms then the world would be a lovely place free of STDs. And, not all STDs can be prevented by a condom anyway.

    I use this logic specifically to this scenario. Besides such a comparison is invalid and fallacious.
    Offline

    2
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by alkaline.)
    you like labia/ big labia?
    I didnt think it was labia he was talking about.
    Offline

    18
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by Youngmetro)
    It does cause complications, search it for yourself. It still holds the risk of disease etc etc. On that basis, it is still more practical. Therefore when an adult makes the decision on that premise then it is perfectly fine and justified.

    STDs, well if everyone wore condoms then the world would be a lovely place free of STDs. And, not all STDs can be prevented by a condom anyway.

    I use this logic specifically to this scenario. Besides such a comparison is invalid and fallacious.
    It is very uncommon to get a disease due to your foreskin, all it takes is basic hygiene, Everything holds a risk but this is not justified as to cutting of foreskin.
    Not all stds can be prevented by circumcision,and in no way is circumcision much of a benefit against stds
    Offline

    20
    (Original post by TSRUsername99)
    In my experience it was more than a little, not enough to make sex a struggle but enough to make it less pleasurable, especially blowjobs.
    That's down to the person giving - and receiving. Again, I've never had any problems there, though when it's happened I've stopped it after a short time, the idea of it doesn't do anything for me. If you get me.
    Offline

    18
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by Youngmetro)
    It does cause complications, search it for yourself. It still holds the risk of disease etc etc. On that basis, it is still more practical. Therefore when an adult makes the decision on that premise then it is perfectly fine and justified.

    STDs, well if everyone wore condoms then the world would be a lovely place free of STDs. And, not all STDs can be prevented by a condom anyway.

    I use this logic specifically to this scenario. Besides such a comparison is invalid and fallacious.
    Search Botched circumcision or something like that, If you want to
    Offline

    20
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by Aspiringhigh)
    i got circumcised as a baby and despite being the least religious person ever im insanely grateful my parents did it because foreskins are gross and unhygienic :/
    pornstar **** ftw
    Foreskins are neither gross nor unhygienic.
    Offline

    2
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by AperfectBalance)
    It is very uncommon to get a disease due to your foreskin, all it takes is basic hygiene, Everything holds a risk but this is not justified as to cutting of foreskin.
    Not all stds can be prevented by circumcision,and in no way is circumcision much of a benefit against stds
    The premise for circumcision is still there, circumcision reduces chances of certain diseases, same with STDs, the chance is reduced.
    Offline

    18
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by Youngmetro)
    The premise for circumcision is still there, circumcision reduces chances of certain diseases, same with STDs, the chance is reduced.
    Negligibly. it is pretty vile to chop someones skin of without their permission
    Offline

    2
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by AperfectBalance)
    Search Botched circumcision or something like that, If you want to
    It doesnt seem like there's much chance of this in Britain. Sure, the procedure can go wrong, just like a pregnancy.
    Offline

    2
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by AperfectBalance)
    Negligibly. it is pretty vile to chop someones skin of without their permission
    No, it isnt negligible.
    Offline

    15
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by AperfectBalance)
    Search Botched circumcision or something like that, If you want to
    *googles botched circumcision*

    this appears
    Spoiler:
    Show
    Offline

    20
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by Youngmetro)
    Second, a circumcised vagina aint even aesthetically pleasing.
    This is a nonsensical justification because attraction is totally subjective. Some people will prefer the look of circumcised dicks and others will hate how they look.

    The subjectivity of what one perceives to be beautiful is not a valid reason for cutting off a part of a someone's body that will never grow back, especially when said person cannot understand the implications involved and consent.
 
 
 
Poll
Do I go to The Streets tomorrow night?
Useful resources

The Student Room, Get Revising and Marked by Teachers are trading names of The Student Room Group Ltd.

Register Number: 04666380 (England and Wales), VAT No. 806 8067 22 Registered Office: International House, Queens Road, Brighton, BN1 3XE

Write a reply...
Reply
Hide
Reputation gems: You get these gems as you gain rep from other members for making good contributions and giving helpful advice.