Hey there! Sign in to join this conversationNew here? Join for free
x Turn on thread page Beta
    Offline

    12
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by NNB_Herath)
    even i wrote anti-bumbing granules.... and water in ,... and water out
    i wrote cornical granles!!! smthn from bio what the heck lool
    Offline

    2
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by pondsteps)
    wait why is that wrong , i did the same
    There were square brackets as it's already explained in the other post.You have solve the brackets first BIDMAS.The correct energy value is 27### and -418 Kj/mol enthalpy change.
    Offline

    2
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by pondsteps)
    i wrote cornical granles!!! smthn from bio what the heck lool
    Those are waaaay different.
    Offline

    12
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by OnTheHorizon)
    Those are waaaay different.
    loool ik obv! its cos i had bio the day before so my brain was full of bio stuff
    Offline

    3
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by ToxicPhantom007)
    1st, 2nd were not valid because rounding off doesnt give a huge difference. Heat loss and incomplete comb were the valid statements
    But how was the incomplete combustion one valid?? If anything, incomplete combustion would have caused soot to form on the can so the mass difference (i.e. mass of ethanol) would be lower, so the calculated value should have been higher.

    What did you say as an explanation?
    Offline

    12
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by OnTheHorizon)
    There were square brackets as it's already explained in the other post.You have solve the brackets first BIDMAS.The correct energy value is 27### and -418 Kj/mol enthalpy change.
    oh haha thats what i got actually
    Offline

    3
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by IAROX15)
    But the x-axis was discrete data. How could that be a line graph?
    Hmmm why are you bringing statistics into this?
    The x axis should have 5 values... 1,2,3,4,5... to indicate the number of carbon atoms in a particular compound.
    Offline

    14
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by pondsteps)
    i wrote cornical granles!!! smthn from bio what the heck lool
    hahahaha
    CORTICAL GRANULES.... what the...
    they are found in the FEMALE EGG CELL >...haha haahahahaha what the...ahaha
    Offline

    3
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by Blazyy)
    What was the test for iodine?

    First I put down dilute hno3, then agn03 gives yellow ppt
    But I changed it to add h2so4, purple fumes
    I put alcoholic AgNO3 which should give a yellow precipitate.
    Offline

    14
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by Blazyy)
    Hmmm why are you bringing statistics into this?
    The x axis should have 5 values... 1,2,3,4,5... to indicate the number of carbon atoms in a particular compound.
    was that number of Carbon atoms or the number of TOTAL ATOMS
    I did for number of TOTAL ATOMS
    Offline

    3
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by Blazyy)
    Hmmm why are you bringing statistics into this?
    The x axis should have 5 values... 1,2,3,4,5... to indicate the number of carbon atoms in a particular compound.
    idk thats what I read somewhere
    I hope they accept both
    Offline

    12
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by NNB_Herath)
    hahahaha
    CORTICAL GRANULES.... what the...
    they are found in the FEMALE EGG CELL >...haha haahahahaha what the...ahaha
    LOOL IK shutup
    Offline

    14
    ReputationRep:
    was that number of Carbon atoms or the number of TOTAL ATOMS
    I did for number of TOTAL ATOMS
    Offline

    2
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by IAROX15)
    But how was the incomplete combustion one valid?? If anything, incomplete combustion would have caused soot to form on the can so the mass difference (i.e. mass of ethanol) would be lower, so the calculated value should have been higher.

    What did you say as an explanation?
    Wouldn't the mass be higher as we are measuring the mass of the copper can, and so if there's soot on the bottom of it, this will make the can slightly heavier. Because we are using the mass of the copper can to find the heat energy released to then find the enthalpy change of combustion.
    Offline

    2
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by notsoclueless)
    I forgot to BALANCE !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
    Darny darn darrn.. I didn't write K2CO3 :/ There goes two more marks :/ That's like 5+2 something gone till now :/[/QUOTE]

    I thought it was a carbonate anion, so at least you get a mark Totally forgot to take the water vapour into account
    Offline

    2
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by NNB_Herath)
    was that number of Carbon atoms or the number of TOTAL ATOMS
    I did for number of TOTAL ATOMS
    It was the number of carbon atoms
    Offline

    14
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by don't cry-craft)
    It was the number of carbon atoms
    are you sure ???????? (((
    Offline

    11
    ReputationRep:
    Do you guys remember what was the question about relating to the -OH observation?
    Offline

    2
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by I <3 WORK)
    Do you guys remember what was the question about relating to the -OH observation?
    which question?
    Offline

    5
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by ToxicPhantom007)
    Anyways we still have unit 1 and 2. Best of luck everybody.
    I also have Physics unit 3 tomorrow
    Best of luck
 
 
 
Reply
Submit reply
Turn on thread page Beta
Updated: June 13, 2017
Poll
Do you agree with the proposed ban on plastic straws and cotton buds?

The Student Room, Get Revising and Marked by Teachers are trading names of The Student Room Group Ltd.

Register Number: 04666380 (England and Wales), VAT No. 806 8067 22 Registered Office: International House, Queens Road, Brighton, BN1 3XE

Write a reply...
Reply
Hide
Reputation gems: You get these gems as you gain rep from other members for making good contributions and giving helpful advice.