who is the cleverest person on tsr? Watch

xTazx
Badges: 13
Rep:
?
#201
Report 10 years ago
#201
Define "cleverest".
0
reply
Vohamanah
Badges: 14
Rep:
?
#202
Report 10 years ago
#202
Already been done
0
reply
Bagration
Badges: 15
Rep:
?
#203
Report 10 years ago
#203
...As if somebody said me LOL
0
reply
Liquidus Zeromus
Badges: 3
Rep:
?
#204
Report 10 years ago
#204
(Original post by Bagration)
...As if somebody said me LOL
Oh Lord no.
0
reply
Phalanges
Badges: 16
Rep:
?
#205
Report 10 years ago
#205
(Original post by Mr Snips)
Many subjects that simply require learning facts provides no indication
Yes, but A Levels in Maths, Further Maths, Physics and to a lesser extent Chemistry (I can only speak from experience, I'm sure there are more) require you to learn concepts and then apply it to a given situation.

While it is very easy to pass GCSE's well just by swallowing a textbook, I think that A Levels require you to actually understand what's going on in the first place.
0
reply
Mr Snips
Badges: 15
Rep:
?
#206
Report 10 years ago
#206
(Original post by jonnyofengland)
Yes, but A Levels in Maths, Further Maths, Physics and to a lesser extent Chemistry (I can only speak from experience, I'm sure there are more) require you to learn concepts and then apply it to a given situation.

While it is very easy to pass GCSE's well just by swallowing a textbook, I think that A Levels require you to actually understand what's going on in the first place.
Maths, for me, is simply about learning how to use formulas - after that there's little else. Chemistry A Level is exactly the same, just reading a revision guide. Funnily enough, yesterday my chemistry class was talking about how they actually know very little chemistry; they have simply learned from a revision guide. I grant you physics requires some application of knowledge yes. Further maths I have not done before.
0
reply
Mr. Orange
Badges: 15
Rep:
?
#207
Report 10 years ago
#207
Generalebriety
0
reply
yodude888
Badges: 16
Rep:
?
#208
Report 10 years ago
#208
I'm the current Swiss -16s Debating Champion -lol.
0
reply
tired yet?
Badges: 1
Rep:
?
#209
Report 10 years ago
#209
it's not me that's for sure, i'm alarmingly stupid.
0
reply
SimonM
Badges: 18
Rep:
?
#210
Report 10 years ago
#210
(Original post by Daniel Freedman)
Everyone in the maths forum.
I wouldn't stretch that far...
0
reply
BingBangBong
Badges: 0
Rep:
?
#211
Report 10 years ago
#211
(Original post by SimonM)
I wouldn't stretch that far...
You're quite bright yourself.
0
reply
Dadeyemi
Badges: 13
Rep:
?
#212
Report 10 years ago
#212
With out a doubt the poster of this
0
reply
Redemption
Badges: 13
Rep:
?
#213
Report 10 years ago
#213
(Original post by jonnyofengland)
Yes, but A Levels in Maths, Further Maths, Physics and to a lesser extent Chemistry (I can only speak from experience, I'm sure there are more) require you to learn concepts and then apply it to a given situation.

While it is very easy to pass GCSE's well just by swallowing a textbook, I think that A Levels require you to actually understand what's going on in the first place.
For the most part, A-Levels are still memory tests.

I'd say the subject that tests the brain the most is without a doubt Further Maths; but if you have a good teacher and a small class it's not too hard to do fine in.
0
reply
tristanperry
Badges: 0
Rep:
?
#214
Report 10 years ago
#214
(Original post by tristanperry)
Sorry, rather - correlation doesn't necessitate causation.

Obviously intelligences helps with exams in that you can take in the work easier than others (and thus have a better opportunity to gain better grades), however exams aren't about intelligence or knowledge of work (up to A-levels). They are purely about exam technique and how well a candidate meets the criteria of a mark scheme. Our exam system is flawed in that respect (although no system would be perfect, however the Polish law system at degree level sounds pretty good - having mostly oral exams)

That's why some of the smartest people of all time struggled to get into a good academia institution. They didn't meet the criteria, despite being absolutely brilliant.
Thanks to whoever left me neg. rep for this post (especially considering it called me stupid)... whoever left it, please have the guts to own up to it.
0
reply
Mathematician!
Badges: 11
Rep:
?
#215
Report 10 years ago
#215
(Original post by yodude888)
I'm the current Swiss -16s Debating Champion -lol.
Prove it, lol
0
reply
DaveJ
Badges: 0
Rep:
?
#216
Report 10 years ago
#216
(Original post by tristanperry)
Thanks to whoever left me neg. rep for this post (especially considering it called me stupid)... whoever left it, please have the guts to own up to it.

I didn't neg you for it, even though it was me you were replying to.


I don't agree overly though - a really intelligent person shouldn't struggle with the A Level system if they are very intelligent, as it is mainly learning and a small bit of applying. I can't imagine that's too tough for a real intellectual.
0
reply
necessarily benevolent
Badges: 14
Rep:
?
#217
Report 10 years ago
#217
(Original post by DaveJ)
I didn't neg you for it, even though it was me you were replying to.


I don't agree overly though - a really intelligent person shouldn't struggle with the A Level system if they are very intelligent, as it is mainly learning and a small bit of applying. I can't imagine that's too tough for a real intellectual.
What about early A levels?
0
reply
DaveJ
Badges: 0
Rep:
?
#218
Report 10 years ago
#218
(Original post by necessarily benevolent)
What about early A levels?
Well I don't think they're overly relevant to my point, but if someone takes them early, then it's probably harder for them to get a high grade.
0
reply
necessarily benevolent
Badges: 14
Rep:
?
#219
Report 10 years ago
#219
(Original post by DaveJ)
Well I don't think they're overly relevant to my point, but if someone takes them early, then it's probably harder for them to get a high grade.
Yipee, I'm special. :p:
0
reply
Melancholy
Badges: 20
Rep:
?
#220
Report 10 years ago
#220
(Original post by Pavlik)
By objective, I mean that it gives equal weight to the reproductive and survival interests of others as it does to your own. In the context of organisms in general, and humans who are not modern white men, this universal altruism is an aberration, and not something that I wish to participate in.
Not precisely, no. Survival interests are independent from race. There's little reason to solely apply the 'Golden Rule' amongst one portion of human life unless you believe in performing one moral act towards one human and less moral acts towards others.

Instinct is far older than thought, and far less corruptible. I do not perceive my racist instincts to be a pathology that needs suppressing, any more than my instincts to defend my close family and treat them preferentially are a pathology.
That's quite clearly wrong. Thought can be based upon reason and logic. "Instinct" does not have these components behind it. Suppose that somebody instinctually does not like cotton wool (and such phobias exist) then they are, by definition, acting irrationally. I have the instinctual feeling of revenge, but it does not mean I shouldn't supress my feelings and instincts with reasoned thought.

Prosper in this instance means to reproduce and not to be displaced from their territories. I don't think that the indigenous Americans or Australians have prospered, despite the fact that they now live in very vibrant and diverse surroundings, with advanced economies.
Well, people will still be able to reproduce and live on land. I'd also say that America is a lot more modernised and better off now than has been in the past. The same applies to Australia and Britain. Standards of living, our vibrant fashion trends, our ability to purchase expensive products - these are all benefits to modern societies which the comparitively closed economies of countries from the past did not see.

Perhaps it would the intelligent man who would employ their reasoned thoughts rather than mere instinct?
0
reply
X

Quick Reply

Attached files
Write a reply...
Reply
new posts
Latest
My Feed

See more of what you like on
The Student Room

You can personalise what you see on TSR. Tell us a little about yourself to get started.

Personalise

Are you chained to your phone?

Yes (68)
19.43%
Yes, but I'm trying to cut back (144)
41.14%
Nope, not that interesting (138)
39.43%

Watched Threads

View All