Hey there! Sign in to join this conversationNew here? Join for free

Oxford gang found guilty of grooming and sexually exploiting girls Watch

    Offline

    1
    ReputationRep:
    On absolutely inappropriate note,

    the man on the top left hand corner looks like an Asian Snoop Dogg.

    But it is really horrible what they did.
    Offline

    0
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by Ronove)
    How can you not grasp that it is because the proportion of these people with Pakistani Muslim backgrounds (regardless of whether you would say they can be called Muslims themselves) make up an entirely disproportionate amount of the perpetrators in these particular group grooming cases, and that white, Christian people aren't mentioned as being white/Christian because that is the way to describe the vast majority of the population. It doesn't narrow anything down whatsoever and does not have even a hint of significant correlatory value, unlike the Pakistani Muslim issue.

    No-one is saying about Pakistanis, or about Muslims. You can say it has nothing whatsoever to do with being Pakistani and nothing whatsoever to do with being Muslim all you like, but then we're still left with a shocking number of Pakistani Muslim perpetrators of this crime. If we can't talk about possible connections, we're not going to get anywhere. Stop being so bloody defensive and obstinate.
    You can't just say 'regardless of whether you would say they can be called Muslims themselves' like it's not even important. That's the biggest problem with the coverage of these stories. Why don't you go away and think about what constitutes Christianness, or Hinduness, or Sikhness, then come back and tell me why it is utterly ridiculous to identify these men as 'Muslim'.

    And why can't you see that online grooming, online child porn rings and incest paedophilia are vastly over-represented amongst white English people? Yes, they form the majority. Fine. But why should being a majority automatically absolve you from criticism? (for the record, I'm against all of this 'overrepresented, underrepresented' bull****, I'm just trying to play your game) If you look at the statistics for lots of criminal activity, it's very easy to make arbitrary arguments for or against all kinds of racial/ethnic/cultural/religious profiling. And it doesn't work. Because bad people are bad people, it doesn't matter what boxes they tick on an equal opportunities monitoring form.
    Offline

    15
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by Eb1234)
    You can't just say 'regardless of whether you would say they can be called Muslims themselves' like it's not even important. That's the biggest problem with the coverage of these stories. Why don't you go away and think about what constitutes Christianness, or Hinduness, or Sikhness, then come back and tell me why it is utterly ridiculous to identify these men as 'Muslim'.

    And why can't you see that online grooming, online child porn rings and incest paedophilia are vastly over-represented amongst white English people? Yes, they form the majority. Fine. But why should being a majority automatically absolve you from criticism? (for the record, I'm against all of this 'overrepresented, underrepresented' bull****, I'm just trying to play your game) If you look at the statistics for lots of criminal activity, it's very easy to make arbitrary arguments for or against all kinds of racial/ethnic/cultural/religious profiling. And it doesn't work. Because bad people are bad people, it doesn't matter what boxes they tick on an equal opportunities monitoring form.
    They come from a Muslim background. They could be practising Muslims, they could have been totally detached from the subject since the earlier years of their childhood, but since you have no ****ing idea which of them it is any more than anyone else, and they still have the Muslim background in common, it is something we should consider looking into on our search for explanations. That is not to say that we should scour the Qu'ran for wisdom. The idea that we would find anything in the bare bones of the religion that we don't already know is preposterous. That you seem to think that this is what anyone is suggesting we do is equally preposterous.

    You don't seem to be able to grasp what disproportionate means. First you suggest that white English people are disproportionate in their representation amongst online groomers and child porn rings, then you say it is because they are the majority. These two things do not work together. If they are in fact significantly over-represented, and you want to actually provide evidence that that is the case, and discuss the reasoning behind why that may be, that's fine. White people have no problem discussing why well-off, older white men might be the prime culprits in, for example, sex tourism in Thailand. I don't think well-off, older white men would have any more of a problem with discussing it or having people examine it any more than the rest of the white population, either. 'White people commit sex crimes too' is the most dreadful defence of your continued attacks of people in this thread. So ****ing what? We investigate those. We'll investigate these particular groups as well if you stop trying to obstruct with your attempts to play the race/religion card.

    So why do you suddenly have such an issue with the idea of these men and their motivations being examined? You seem to be physically incapable of separating the Daily Mail comments section demographic from the rest of the population. They are going to make snide comments about Muslims and Pakistanis (if they even read enough to see the Pakistani connection) no matter what happens. It is simply an excuse for them to air their xenophobia and racism. Actually investigating this apparent Pakistani Muslim connection is not going to influence that either way (and even if it ever were to make them noisier temporarily, surely you can put aside your sensibilities for a second so that we can figure out how to protect young women and girls from this happening again?).
    Offline

    0
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by Ronove)
    They come from a Muslim background. They could be practising Muslims, they could have been totally detached from the subject since the earlier years of their childhood, but since you have no ****ing idea which of them it is any more than anyone else, and they still have the Muslim background in common, it is something we should consider looking into on our search for explanations. That is not to say that we should scour the Qu'ran for wisdom. The idea that we would find anything in the bare bones of the religion that we don't already know is preposterous. That you seem to think that this is what anyone is suggesting we do is equally preposterous.

    You don't seem to be able to grasp what disproportionate means. First you suggest that white English people are disproportionate in their representation amongst online groomers and child porn rings, then you say it is because they are the majority. These two things do not work together. If they are in fact significantly over-represented, and you want to actually provide evidence that that is the case, and discuss the reasoning behind why that may be, that's fine. White people have no problem discussing why well-off, older white men might be the prime culprits in, for example, sex tourism in Thailand. I don't think well-off, older white men would have any more of a problem with discussing it or having people examine it any more than the rest of the white population, either. 'White people commit sex crimes too' is the most dreadful defence of your continued attacks of people in this thread. So ****ing what? We investigate those. We'll investigate these particular groups as well if you stop trying to obstruct with your attempts to play the race/religion card.

    So why do you suddenly have such an issue with the idea of these men and their motivations being examined? You seem to be physically incapable of separating the Daily Mail comments section demographic from the rest of the population. They are going to make snide comments about Muslims and Pakistanis (if they even read enough to see the Pakistani connection) no matter what happens. It is simply an excuse for them to air their xenophobia and racism. Actually investigating this apparent Pakistani Muslim connection is not going to influence that either way (and even if it ever were to make them noisier temporarily, surely you can put aside your sensibilities for a second so that we can figure out how to protect young women and girls from this happening again?).
    Well said.

    Paedophilia is a disgusting crime, and whatever fuels it must be cut out at the root and ultimately this is the responsibility of us all, plainly out of simple humanity. The scandal of the Catholic priests abusing children and the cover up by the Church has had a great deal of coverage and has rocked the foundations of this instituion, the controversy is still going on. But does that mean that every Catholic is a paedophile? No, just as every Muslim Pakistani is not a paedophile either. But that there is a problem within the Church has been acknowledged, that of Catholic priests sexually abusing catholic children. And there is a similar problem in the Muslim Pakistani community, but the victims almost entirely come from outside that community, usually white children.

    Yes there are online groomers, the white nonce usually acts alone. But the massive overrepresentation of Muslim Pakistanis in grooming gangs right across the country is a glaring and statistically established fact that only a fool would ignore. Mohammed Shafiq of the Ramadan Foundation, himself a Pakistani Muslim, has accused the Muslim Pakistani community of 'burying their heads in the sand' over this very real fact, the over-representation of Muslim Pakistanis in the grooming statistics. Other Muslim Pakistanis have had the humanity and the courage to identify and speak out against this evil, but it is sad to see that there are others here who still continue. to indeed bury their heads in the sand.
    At least some of the perpetrators have admitted that their crimes were racially motivated and the police in some constabularies, particularly West Yorkshire, have admitted that their failure to deal with the crimes in the first place was at least partially due to the fact that the suspects came from a minority group.


    As I've mentioned in the past, especially after the convictions of the Rochdale grooming gang last year, this is not going to go away unless some uncomfortable truths are accepted and action is taken on the basis of this. And now a year later there has been the conviction of these disgusting men in Oxford. Even after the recent conviction of the seven perverts in Oxford, another group of men, all Muslim Pakistani, have been charged for grooming girls in Oxford and await trial. This is happening in several towns and cities across the country. Unless the PC brigade and the Muslim Pakistani community recognise this uncomfortable fact and work to address it, rather than denying that there is a problem at all, then more of these cases are going to come to light (as well as untold misery for the child victims) and this is going to demonise the whole community who will end up inevitably and unjustly being tarred with the same brush.
    Offline

    0
    ReputationRep:
    Julie Siddiqi, of the Islamic Society of Britain, said it was time for some very straight talking about a crime in which men from Muslim backgrounds are being implicated.

    “I am willing to go as far as to say there does seem to be a pattern emerging of people from the same background and we need to be open about that and do something about it,” she said.

    “It’s certainly not Islam, anything but it! But, associations with names and imagery will inevitably be made when the police make arrests and, let’s face it, those associations with Islam will be exploited too. So I do feel strongly that Muslim groups need to be there at the forefront with other partners, looking more closely at this particular issue

    The facts and figures need to be much better on this. At the moment it’s very easy for someone to say to me – which they do – that actually most of the perpetrators of child abuse in this country are white males.

    “But this particular behaviour and way of going about it does seem to be related to people of a certain background.

    “Every young female must be protected from such calculated evil. And if our coming together as civil society can help bring the full weight of the law upon the types of vile gangs we are reading about, and if it means we tackle those attitudes that can enable such gangs to keep carrying out their organised crime, then we shall. But it does require work, frankness and some guts. We cannot keep reading about these cases for the next five or ten years. Doing nothing is not an option.”

    http://www.isb.org.uk/caase/
    Offline

    14
    ReputationRep:
    One thing certainly is obvious whenever news of these hits the press.

    The Pakistani/Muslim/Asian community leaders (along with many on TSR) - essentially a Victorian society that has landed like Doctor Who's Tardis on a liberal, permissive planet it despises - are at pains to deny that the grooming gang's behaviour has anything to do with ethnic origin or contemptible attitudes towards women.

    Then the self hating full of white guilt social services and the police and children's commissioners who have been on a few too many diversity training courses trot out the lame lines that Asian men targeting white girls is "just one of a number of models", even though such "models" account for an improbably large proportion of all gang sexual abuse.

    Then you hear that social services was aware of it all along for years, but nobody wanted to be the one who got ****canned because they dared to suggest such a racist thing - see below.

    The odd Muslim community leader or imam will dare to suggest what everyone else is already thinking, and then the rest of the Muslim community will come down on him like a ton of bricks as some sort of 'traitor'.

    The chief constable will 'take full responsibility' for all failures, yet stay in their job. "Lessons have been learned".

    The perpetrators are punished and go to prison. But nothing about why the perpetrators always seem to have certain ethnic minority characteristics and quite possibly religious beliefs in common with other separate but similar incidents (as did the victims) is ever analysed (because everyone in the public sector knows the way to keep your job is by keeping your head down and your mouth shut, especially where minorities are involved) and no measures are taken to prevent it happening again. So once the hoo-ha from the last case that hit the media has died down, it does.

    Regular as clockwork.
    Offline

    14
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by Eb1234)
    No mate, you've got the wrong end of the stick. Catholic priests are Catholic priests. If it was a Catholic man carrying out the paedophilia, the media wouldn't mention his religion. If it was Muslim Imams carrying out paedophilia, I would have NO problem with Muslim Imams being described as such, in fact it would be imperative that they were described that way.

    Pakistani grooming gangs, whilst they have a Muslim BACKGROUND, no person with an ounce of objectivity could describe them as 'Muslims'. There is no evidence to suggest they are 'Muslim', or even if they believe in God, for that matter. I thought I had dissected this point sufficiently in my earlier post? The media wants to have it both ways: they want to use 'Muslim' as an ethnic designation (ie don't at all acknowledge whether said Muslims are practicing or not) but use the argument that being nasty to Muslims isn't racist, because Islam is a religion, not an ethnic group. Re-read my earlier post.

    Dude, I read Mailonline religiously. The disparity between how crime is reported if a 'Muslim' commits and how it's reported if it's a Christian/atheist is stark. Religion doesn't even come into it if it's a white guy. I could almost write a thesis on this.
    Sorry, but that doesn't hold water. Catholic priests are a minority, just like muslim men are a minority.

    If there were perhaps one or two cases of Catholic priests who had committed one or two offences, people would rightly write that off as unremarkable.

    But there have been dozens. Too many just for random chance or pure coincidence. So people are going to wonder, what is it about Catholic priests and their predilection for buggery?

    In the same way, if there was ONE gang of Asian child groomers that had hit the front pages, then perhaps your argument would hold water. But there wasn't, I have posted evidence of at least six.

    Now for people to write that off as unremarkable, there would have to be evidence of at least sixty white gangs hitting the front pages in the last few years, given the proportions of Asian to white in the UK population at approximately 10:1 .

    You know what, I can't even remember one. Perhaps that is because even if there was, that would be unremarkable, given the numbers in the population.

    So it is sensible reality that if in a certain population size you have a disproportionate number of cases with the same characteristics which cannot be put down to the normal proportional distributions of crimes per sector (whether that be age, race, occupation or some other) of the population compared to the national average, you analyse what is making this sector stand out in order to better understand it and better target resources at it. As a result, we have the police running Operation Trident, specifically targeting gun and knife crime in the black community.

    So people are right to analyse why Catholic priest child rapists stand out in the population, just as Asian grooming gangs do for the same reason.

    Odd also that it only seems to be TSR's Asian population trying to pretend that the fact that all these gangs had many common attributes is irrelevant and unimportant, perhaps there just aren't that many Catholic priests on TSR to defend themselves.

    Or perhaps those of them that are here recognise that

    A - it isn't a problem with all, or even the majority of Catholic priests, and
    B - they recognise that it is a problem in their community that needs to be dealt with, and
    C - they realise that if they pretend the problem doesn't exist and nothing is done about it, it will continue to happen and more children will be hurt.

    But maybe that's just me...
    Offline

    2
    ReputationRep:
    This article is about right.

    http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/ukne...ite-girls.html
    Offline

    2
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by mangamaan)
    You're a whiny little cu** arn't you?
    So you respond with foul abuse to a well reasoned argument. That says it all.
    Offline

    14
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by mangamaan)
    You're a whiny little [...] arn't you?
    While I am always glad to have young people participating in debates with me, its with the proviso that they keep the debate at an adult level.

    Perhaps you have been a little bit too ambitious taking part in a discussion between adults as you appear to be more then a little out of your depth when it comes to sensible argument.

    It is to your credit that you have actually made the attempt to participate, but I think that its more then likely that your parents would prefer you to concentrate on your schoolwork for the time being, and maybe enter the forum of ideas in a few years time.
    Offline

    0
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by Marco1)
    This article is about right.

    http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/ukne...ite-girls.html
    Great article, about sums it up.
    Offline

    0
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by Ronove)
    They come from a Muslim background. They could be practising Muslims, they could have been totally detached from the subject since the earlier years of their childhood, but since you have no ****ing idea which of them it is any more than anyone else, and they still have the Muslim background in common, it is something we should consider looking into on our search for explanations.
    That's probably the most sensible, reasoned argument you've made so far. We have no ****ing idea of how Muslim they are or not. So they shouldn't be described as Muslim. Saying they have a Muslim background is slightly more acceptable than blanket describing them as Muslim. But like I said, no sex outside marriage is permitted by Islam, dealing in drugs, alcohol etc are forbidden by Islam. So if we want to look at patterns of behaviour you'll see that everything these people are doing is contrary to Islam. So trying to bring Islam into this is completely spurious.
    Offline

    14
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by Eb1234)
    That's probably the most sensible, reasoned argument you've made so far. We have no ****ing idea of how Muslim they are or not. So they shouldn't be described as Muslim. Saying they have a Muslim background is slightly more acceptable than blanket describing them as Muslim. But like I said, no sex outside marriage is permitted by Islam, dealing in drugs, alcohol etc are forbidden by Islam. So if we want to look at patterns of behaviour you'll see that everything these people are doing is contrary to Islam. So trying to bring Islam into this is completely spurious.
    Earlier you said in a reply to me that it's right to point out that some [abusers] happen to be Catholic priests when they are Catholic priests...

    Why the cognitive dissonance suddenly, that's very un-Catholic and very unpriestly behaviour, I would have thought.

    I'd love to see you justify to us all right here in this thread why is its relevant to point out occupation (incidentally the UK media almost ALWAYS reveals the profession of the perpetrator of a crime, whether he be white, black or some other) and or religion in that case, but not the religion in the case of the ones where the demographic comes a bit to close to yours for your liking.

    Unless you are trying to say that DOWN TO THE FACT that there are a disproportionate number of Catholic priests involved in child sexual abuse, the fact that they are Catholic priests is somehow relevant because Catholic priests somehow have a penchant for the arses of young boys, BUT IN SPITE OF THE FACT that there are a disproportionate number of a certain other demographic involved, this demographic doesn't have a penchant for sexually abusing underage white vulnerable girls so you can't mention that ???

    As far as I know there is nothing in Catholicism that would indicate this...

    So by that logic to bring either Catholicism or Priests into this is completely spurious, but actually it isn't, because you have no problem with linking them to child abuse cases when it happens...
    Offline

    0
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by marcusfox)
    Earlier you said in a reply to me that it's right to point out that some [abusers] happen to be Catholic priests when they are Catholic priests...

    Why the cognitive dissonance suddenly, that's very un-Catholic and very unpriestly behaviour, I would have thought.

    I'd love to see you justify to us all right here in this thread why is its relevant to point out occupation (incidentally the UK media almost ALWAYS reveals the profession of the perpetrator of a crime, whether he be white, black or some other) and or religion in that case, but not the religion in the case of the ones where the demographic comes a bit to close to yours for your liking.

    Unless you are trying to say that DOWN TO THE FACT that there are a disproportionate number of Catholic priests involved in child sexual abuse, the fact that they are Catholic priests is somehow relevant because Catholic priests somehow have a penchant for the arses of young boys, BUT IN SPITE OF THE FACT that there are a disproportionate number of a certain other demographic involved, this demographic doesn't have a penchant for sexually abusing underage white vulnerable girls so you can't mention that ???

    As far as I know there is nothing in Catholicism that would indicate this...

    So by that logic to bring either Catholicism or Priests into this is completely spurious, but actually it isn't, because you have no problem with linking them to child abuse cases when it happens...
    I've already addressed this point. Catholic priest is their job. Like I said, if it was Imams doing this, it would only be right to describe them as Imams. Also, I'm not linking child abuse to Catholicism at all. It is merely a description of their profession.

    The media almost never describes the religion of the perpetrator unless they are Muslim. There was a spate of high profile rapes and gang rapes in India recently. I couldn't find a single article where the religion of the rapists was discussed. Not a single one.

    Compare that to the molestation of the CNN presenter in Egypt in Tahrir Square, and immediately, Islam gets blamed. It's scapegoating pure and simple.

    There is no evidence that any of the men in the grooming cases are Muslims. Muslim-background, yes, but religious background is never mentioned when any other gang of criminals is convicted. That is my problem. If it was a 'Muslim' problem, why haven't any gangs of Somali's convicted? I live in Liverpool and there are Somalis coming out of the rafters. Why aren't any Egyptian gangs being convicted? There are plenty of Egyptians in London. That is why I think linking this to religion is another media effort to demonise Muslims.
    Offline

    14
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by Eb1234)
    I've already addressed this point. Catholic priest is their job. Like I said, if it was Imams doing this, it would only be right to describe them as Imams. Also, I'm not linking child abuse to Catholicism at all. It is merely a description of their profession.

    The media almost never describes the religion of the perpetrator unless they are Muslim. There was a spate of high profile rapes and gang rapes in India recently. I couldn't find a single article where the religion of the rapists was discussed. Not a single one.

    Compare that to the molestation of the CNN presenter in Egypt in Tahrir Square, and immediately, Islam gets blamed. It's scapegoating pure and simple.

    There is no evidence that any of the men in the grooming cases are Muslims. Muslim-background, yes, but religious background is never mentioned when any other gang of criminals is convicted. That is my problem. If it was a 'Muslim' problem, why haven't any gangs of Somali's convicted? I live in Liverpool and there are Somalis coming out of the rafters. Why aren't any Egyptian gangs being convicted? There are plenty of Egyptians in London. That is why I think linking this to religion is another media effort to demonise Muslims.
    I see, so what you are saying is despite abusing children having nothing to do with any religion or indeed occupation (that's ignoring whatever perverse interpretations might be out there - every reasonable person agrees that it isn't), you can still label Catholic priest offenders Catholic priests, but with Muslim offenders, even if the offender considers themselves a Muslim, you can't call him a Muslim? Describing them as a Muslim is accurate if it is the religion they profess to follow, is it not?
    Offline

    0
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by marcusfox)
    I see, so what you are saying is despite abusing children having nothing to do with any religion or indeed occupation (that's ignoring whatever perverse interpretations might be out there - every reasonable person agrees that it isn't), you can still label Catholic priest offenders Catholic priests, but with Muslim offenders, even if the offender considers themselves a Muslim, you can't call him a Muslim? Describing them as a Muslim is accurate if it is the religion they profess to follow, is it not?
    I worry about the unreasonable people. I really, really want to have an intelligent debate on this. The problem is that the far right etc will hijack it and turn it into an anti- Muslim witch hunt.

    Over the past few years, so many issues have been 'debated' by the media and turned into exclusively 'Islamic' issues when the reality is far more complex. That is what I worry about
    Offline

    0
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by marcusfox)
    While I am always glad to have young people participating in debates with me, its with the proviso that they keep the debate at an adult level.

    Perhaps you have been a little bit too ambitious taking part in a discussion between adults as you appear to be more then a little out of your depth when it comes to sensible argument.

    It is to your credit that you have actually made the attempt to participate, but I think that its more then likely that your parents would prefer you to concentrate on your schoolwork for the time being, and maybe enter the forum of ideas in a few years time.
    Haha, enter the forum of ideas.... hahaha.. That's rich coming from a guy that has a polarized attitude and confirmation bias.

    There were some strong views against your comments, however it seemed that you weren't having none of it. You were too fixated with your own agenda and you would see it through regardless if you was wrong.

    Don't ask me to point it out, because I know people like you would like that. I don't want to curtail your speech so carry on as you were.
    Offline

    0
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by Marco1)
    So you respond with foul abuse to a well reasoned argument. That says it all.

    Sorry I didn't think you would be offended when I insulted you're boyfriend.
    Offline

    14
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by mangamaan)
    Haha, enter the forum of ideas.... hahaha.. That's rich coming from a guy that has a polarized attitude and confirmation bias.

    There were some strong views against your comments, however it seemed that you weren't having none of it. You were too fixated with your own agenda and you would see it through regardless if you was wrong.

    Don't ask me to point it out, because I know people like you would like that. I don't want to curtail your speech so carry on as you were.
    There are strong views for my comments too, which is probably why more of my posts in this thread have been uprated than downrated.

    But like my posts, don't let yourself get too concerned with reality.

    As long as people believe as you do, there will be another grooming gang unconnected to but meeting the same demographic as the last one hitting the headlines very soon, and there will be the likes of you rabidly beating on their keyboards and clutching at straws with the same tired old 'No True Scotsman' and 'what about the white paedophiles' to attempt to persuade anyone who will listen that the demographic (conicidentally the same one they belong to, who'd have thought it) isn't really relevant.

    Who knows, they might even post an example of one white gang who's up to the same thing.
    Offline

    11
    ReputationRep:
    ‘Imams promote grooming rings’, Muslim leader claims

    The Oxford grooming ring was promoted by imams who encourage followers to think white women deserve to be “punished”, an Islamic leader has claimed.

    Dr Taj Hargey, imam of the Oxford Islamic Congregation, said race and religion were inextricably linked to the recent spate of grooming rings in which Muslim men have targeted under-age white girls.

    Earlier this week seven members of a child sex ring from Oxford were found guilty of forcing under age girls to commit acts of "extreme depravity".

    Their victims, aged between 11 and 15, were groomed and plied with alcohol and drugs before being sexually assaulted and forced into prostitution. They targeted "out of control" teenagers.

    Dr Hargey said that the case brought shame on the city and the community and is a set back for cross community harmony.

    But worse still is the refusal to face up to its realities, he wrote in the Daily Mail.

    The activities of the Oxford sex ring are “bound up with religion and race” because all the men - though of different nationalities - were Muslim and they “deliberately targeted vulnerable white girls, whom they appeared to regard as 'easy meat', to use one of their revealing, racist phrases”, Dr Hargey said.

    That attitude has been promoted by religious leaders, he believes. “On one level, most imams in the UK are simply using their puritanical sermons to promote the wearing of the hijab and even the burka among their female adherents. But the dire result can be the brutish misogyny we see in the Oxford sex ring.”

    People tiptoe around the issues and refuse to discuss the problems exposed by the scandals such as those “from Rochdale to Oxford, and Telford to Derby”, he wrote.

    In all cases the perpetrators were Muslim men and the victims were under age white girls.
    To pretend it is not a problem is the Islamic community is “ideological denial”, Dr Hargey said.

    “But then part of the reason this scandal happened at all is precisely because of such politically correct thinking. All the agencies of the state, including the police, the social services and the care system, seemed eager to ignore the sickening exploitation that was happening before their eyes.

    “Terrified of accusations of racism, desperate not to undermine the official creed of cultural diversity, they took no action against obvious abuse.”

    The men were allowed, he said, to come and go from care homes by the authorities, and if the situation had been reversed with gangs of white men preying on Muslim teenagers ”the state's agencies would have acted with greater alacrity.”

    True Islam preaches respect for women but in mosques across the country a different doctrine is preached - “one that denigrates all women, but treats whites with particular contempt,” the Imam said.

    The men are taught that women are “second-class citizens, little more than chattels or possessions over whom they have absolute authority," he claims in the column.

    “The view of some Islamic preachers towards white women can be appalling. They encourage their followers to believe that these women are habitually promiscuous, decadent, and sleazy — sins which are made all the worse by the fact that they are kaffurs or non-believers.
    “Their dress code, from miniskirts to sleeveless tops, is deemed to reflect their impure and immoral outlook. According to this mentality, these white women deserve to be punished for their behaviour by being exploited and degraded.”
    Such cases can only be prevented in the future if Britain abandons the blinkers of political correctness, he concludes.
 
 
 
Reply
Submit reply
TSR Support Team

We have a brilliant team of more than 60 Support Team members looking after discussions on The Student Room, helping to make it a fun, safe and useful place to hang out.

Updated: May 23, 2013
  • See more of what you like on The Student Room

    You can personalise what you see on TSR. Tell us a little about yourself to get started.

  • Poll
    Has a teacher ever helped you cheat?
    Useful resources
  • See more of what you like on The Student Room

    You can personalise what you see on TSR. Tell us a little about yourself to get started.

  • The Student Room, Get Revising and Marked by Teachers are trading names of The Student Room Group Ltd.

    Register Number: 04666380 (England and Wales), VAT No. 806 8067 22 Registered Office: International House, Queens Road, Brighton, BN1 3XE

    Write a reply...
    Reply
    Hide
    Reputation gems: You get these gems as you gain rep from other members for making good contributions and giving helpful advice.