Guys would you date a plus size girl?

Take note of this site, and its the interesting read that it is:

http://blog.relationshipsurgery.com/men-really-think-body/

Lets hope you guys who are being indifferent to the size of us girls' bodies then have a read as this might change your way of thinking.

Mocking is not refusing to be attracted to someone.
Plus it's interesting how you only jump on stereotypes that disagree with your POV.

You know that probably accounts for a tiny percentage of fat people, do you often join in fat related threads and hold that one back just so you can throw it in people's faces?





To each their own, I'd consider them undateable though.

Oh more of that "real woman" claptrap. Give it a rest, saying skinny women aren't real women is about as bitter as you can get.

who was it told you that you should be 'ashamed'?

You made derogatory comments. I jump on anyone bodyshaming

The article actually speaks of a 'real woman' in the literal sense of the words - while it mentions skinny women it's more about how a female partner in general, regardless of how attractive models/movie stars may look, is tangible and that is what is attractive: it's hardly criticising skinny women

Yes, when it supports your point of view.

For the most part yes but they couldn't help having a little dig at skinny women at the end, which imo ruined the credibility of the entire article. They're real, and so is the effort they put in to look presentable.

"He will of course still be attracted to the glossy magazine images of skinny models or those too good to be true film stars you see in the movies" - this is nothing against skinny women because it's not just models and film stars that are thin - 'normal' skinny women also exist. This is more of an attack on methods adopted by the media that manipulates the images portrayed in popular industry.

How can you be so sure skinny women in the media are real? Many models and celebrities especially in magazines are airbrushed?

"Having said all this, whether it’s real or not these images in magazines and on the big screen are no competition whatsoever for a living, breathing, fragrant woman sitting next to a man at a restaurant" - it's talking about how stuff shown in the media may not necessarily be totally real/representative. It's hardly saying that skinny women are inferior - in fact it identifies how men are attracted to skinny women so the article is hardly having a 'dig'? The article also in no way specifies the shape of the 'real' woman, referring to a 'real' woman in the sense that they are not celebrities and are 'normal', as "living, breathing and fragrant" - where on earth does it mention size? it simply says that a woman that can be physically touched is incomparable to imagination/fantasy/ and 'celebrities' that you are unlikely to get into a relationship with.

The article is not an argument about skinny women vs bigger women, it's about the attractiveness of women that can be touched and aren't necessarily manipulated by the media.

No, all bodyshaming. I personally don't find very muscular women attractive, but if someone was insulting them saying they looked disgusting, I'd jump in too

What size do you deem fat though? The average size of UK women is a 16 apparently. Kim kardashian is a 14, Kelly brook is a 10/12, Marilyn Monroe was a 16 - but I would not deem them fat. If they had muffin tops and saddle bags, then that's probably where I would say. I don't,like to use the word fat though. That's like saying everyone is fingernails because ye have fingernails, and everyone has fat. Obese would be better to use.

"He will of course still be attracted to the glossy magazine images of skinny models or those too good to be true film stars you see in the movies" - this is nothing against skinny women because it's not just models and film stars that are thin - 'normal' skinny women also exist. This is more of an attack on methods adopted by the media that manipulates the images portrayed in popular industry.

How can you be so sure skinny women in the media are real? Many models and celebrities especially in magazines are airbrushed?

"Having said all this, whether it’s real or not these images in magazines and on the big screen are no competition whatsoever for a living, breathing, fragrant woman sitting next to a man at a restaurant" - it's talking about how stuff shown in the media may not necessarily be totally real/representative. It's hardly saying that skinny women are inferior - in fact it identifies how men are attracted to skinny women so the article is hardly having a 'dig'? The article also in no way specifies the shape of the 'real' woman, referring to a 'real' woman in the sense that they are not celebrities and are 'normal', as "living, breathing and fragrant" - where on earth does it mention size? it simply says that a woman that can be physically touched is incomparable to imagination/fantasy/ and 'celebrities' that you are unlikely to get into a relationship with.

The article is not an argument about skinny women vs bigger women, it's about the attractiveness of women that can be touched and aren't necessarily manipulated by the media.

Exactly, you only support women.




Either they are the same girl or sisters. Yeah the left one is fat and the right looks great. If the same, kudos for dropping the weight. If only others showed that kind of determination.

What size do you deem fat though? The average size of UK women is a 16 apparently. Kim kardashian is a 14, Kelly brook is a 10/12, Marilyn Monroe was a 16 - but I would not deem them fat. If they had muffin tops and saddle bags, then that's probably where I would say. I don't,like to use the word fat though. That's like saying everyone is fingernails because ye have fingernails, and everyone has fat. Obese would be better to use.

This is about women.

Also, no, the one on the left isn't fat.

And you know you said you hate fat women because you grew up in a town of fat women and it caused you to get no sex? That's ridiculous. Women do not exist for the sole purpose to be sexually attractive to you. Seriously you're being ridiculous

Sophie Morgan, who is fit, is a size 12



So is Laura Butler (although she can wear a 10 or 14 depending on the clothes)



Also, clothes size doesn't really tell you anything. You could have someone who's a size 10, someone else who's a size 12, and the 10 could be "fatter" than the 12

Marilyn Monroe was a vintage size 16, which would be the same as a modern day size 10.

Posted from TSR Mobile

What size do you deem fat though? The average size of UK women is a 16 apparently. Kim kardashian is a 14, Kelly brook is a 10/12, Marilyn Monroe was a 16 - but I would not deem them fat. If they had muffin tops and saddle bags, then that's probably where I would say. I don't,like to use the word fat though. That's like saying everyone is fingernails because ye have fingernails, and everyone has fat. Obese would be better to use.

Marilyn Monroe was nowhere near a size 16 by today's standards. She would likely have been an 8 in today's clothing.