Turn on thread page Beta

Whats one thing you'd never do, sexually? watch

Announcements
    Offline

    4
    I'd like to think I'd do almost anything with the opposite gender that happens in the porn media.
    Offline

    3
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by Starvation13)
    I don't think i'll ever understand that fetish lool. I kind of get the "Chicks with dicks" fetish after a lot of reading, but scat? nope, that's beyond me.

    Well erm... that guy.... you know what, I'll just say "it's a free country" cos i am lost for words.
    Yeah some fetishes are very hard to understand. I wonder if there is a vomit fetish? I havent heard of anyone with a vomit fetish yet
    Offline

    16
    ReputationRep:
    nothing involving body waste of any kind but i'd try anything else once
    Offline

    2
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by driftawaay)
    Yeah some fetishes are very hard to understand. I wonder if there is a vomit fetish? I havent heard of anyone with a vomit fetish yet
    It exists. It's called emetophila.
    :smartass:
    Offline

    18
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by callum_law)
    I am curious about the last one. Why is it that you're against a little bit of humiliation? Are you an insecure person who can withstand sexual banter?
    You think humiliation in this context is just banter?

    Okay....
    Offline

    3
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by Twinpeaks)
    You think humiliation in this context is just banter?

    Okay....
    It's banter in the sense of there being a mutual appreciation of the frivolity and playfulness within the humiliation acts, and there not being an underlying sincere belief that the humiliated subject has the humiliating characteristics ascribed to them. In that sense, yes, it's likely equivalent to banter.
    Offline

    7
    ReputationRep:
    Anal, choking, anything to do with pooh or wee, anything really painful and threesome with two guys.
    Offline

    18
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by callum_law)
    It's banter in the sense of there being a mutual appreciation of the frivolity and playfulness within the humiliation acts, and there not being an underlying sincere belief that the humiliated subject has the humiliating characteristics ascribed to them. In that sense, yes, it's likely equivalent to banter.

    I think it's the feeling of humiliation or demeaning another, that is the turn on though. Without that, yes it'd feel like banter, but the fetish is the feeling of humiliation. If it was completely frivolous you wouldn't get that feeling of humiliation.

    That's what I think anyway, I'm not speaking from first hand experience here...
    • Very Important Poster
    Offline

    19
    ReputationRep:
    Very Important Poster
    I'm quite open to almost anything, but I don't want to do the Sado-Maso stuff.
    Offline

    3
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by Twinpeaks)
    I think it's the feeling of humiliation or demeaning another, that is the turn on though. Without that, yes it'd feel like banter, but the fetish is the feeling of humiliation. If it was completely frivolous you wouldn't get that feeling of humiliation.

    That's what I think anyway, I'm not speaking from first hand experience here...
    People engage in BDSM humiliation, the roughest forms of humiliation, and return to respectful relationships once they leave the fantasy. It doesn't necessarily entail a sincere belief that the characteristics ascribed are accurate, just as one's partner dressing up in a police uniform does not necessarily entail a sincere belief that one's partner is a member of a law enforcement organisation.
    Offline

    3
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by SecretDuck)
    I'm quite open to almost anything, but I don't want to do the Sado-Maso stuff.
    Would you touch Postal's bum?
    • Very Important Poster
    Offline

    19
    ReputationRep:
    Very Important Poster
    (Original post by RobML)
    Would you touch Postal's bum?
    Yes, I'm open to anything but Sado-Maso.
    Offline

    18
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by callum_law)
    People engage in BDSM humiliation, the roughest forms of humiliation, and return to respectful relationships once they leave the fantasy. It doesn't necessarily entail a sincere belief that the characteristics ascribed are accurate, just as one's partner dressing up in a police uniform does not necessarily entail a sincere belief that one's partner is a member of a law enforcement organisation.

    But humiliation isn't about how it looks, it's about how you make a person feel, or are made to feel by another.


    It's a psychological technique.
    Offline

    2
    ReputationRep:
    surprised by how many women wouldn't do anal. anal is meant to help women reach orgasm and is more beneficial to the woman that man.

    now im curios, why wouldn't you gals do anal?
    Offline

    3
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by SecretDuck)
    Yes, I'm open to anything but Sado-Maso.
    My bum then?
    • Very Important Poster
    Offline

    19
    ReputationRep:
    Very Important Poster
    (Original post by RobML)
    My bum then?
    Ye.
    Offline

    3
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by Twinpeaks)
    But humiliation isn't about how it looks, it's about how you make a person feel, or are made to feel by another.


    It's a psychological technique.
    I wasn't saying that humiliation only looks to be obnoxious. It can feel obnoxious and hurtful to the participants, but there is an underlying understanding that these feelings only exist to the personae each participant adopts. I compared it to dressing up because to the people who do this it is very much dressing up and developing a role-play.

    You have no concept of what the acts entail, so probably not best to offer your opinion on its dynamics.
    Offline

    18
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by callum_law)
    I wasn't saying that humiliation only looks to be obnoxious. It can feel obnoxious and hurtful to the participants, but there is an underlying understanding that these feelings only exist to the personae each participant adopts. I compared it to dressing up because to the people who do this it is very much dressing up and developing a role-play.

    You have no concept of what the acts entail, so probably not best to offer your opinion on its dynamics.

    Don't pretend that you are an expert on the matter, because you clearly didn't understand what it was in your original post. Dressing up is not a psychological technique to the extent that humiliation is.
    Offline

    3
    ReputationRep:
    Receive anal (I'm a guy :s)
    Offline

    3
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by Twinpeaks)
    Don't pretend that you are an expert on the matter, because you clearly didn't understand what it was in your original post. Dressing up is not a psychological technique to the extent that humiliation is.
    You continue to repeat your conclusion without interrogating the premises of my argument. Up your game or sit this round out, kid.
 
 
 
Poll
Could you cope without Wifi?
Useful resources
AtCTs

Ask the Community Team

Got a question about the site content or our moderation? Ask here.

Welcome Lounge

Welcome Lounge

We're a friendly bunch. Post here if you're new to TSR.

Groups associated with this forum:

View associated groups

The Student Room, Get Revising and Marked by Teachers are trading names of The Student Room Group Ltd.

Register Number: 04666380 (England and Wales), VAT No. 806 8067 22 Registered Office: International House, Queens Road, Brighton, BN1 3XE

Write a reply...
Reply
Hide
Reputation gems: You get these gems as you gain rep from other members for making good contributions and giving helpful advice.