Hey there! Sign in to join this conversationNew here? Join for free
Turn on thread page Beta
    Offline

    17
    ReputationRep:
    This was my best exam yet. It was muuccchh easier than the first paper. Absolutely loved it *cries*
    Offline

    8
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by RHobbs)
    Sure thats fine, probably didn't need two studies as I think it was 4 marks.
    I wrote about Kanner which found hassle scale was a more predicitor of stress such as anxiety, depression etc also accumulation effect of Ruffin where he found that daily hassles are more stressful as they are frequent persistent which build upto to become more stressful while major life events are infrequent

    Would this give me 4 marks or not
    Offline

    3
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by K3lvin)
    I wrote for what a scattergram shows the 2 variables does this get me a mark

    For ethical issues i wrote that the person needs knowledge that they are in research so if consent isnt given then this makes the person unaware which is why it is an ethical issue does this get me 2 marks
    it shows the 2 variables what?
    Offline

    2
    ReputationRep:
    I accidentally wrote "home-work interphase" and not "home-work interface" for the workplace stress question. Do you think i will get the mark?


    Posted from TSR Mobile
    Offline

    2
    ReputationRep:
    For the 12 marker i talked about anti psycotoic drugs, anti depressants as well as BZs and beta blockers
    i then evaluated this fully with like 2 strengths and 2 weaknesses
    such as the WHO found anti-pscyotic were superior to placebos proving its effectiveness
    drugs only treat symptoms of abnormality not causes so ineffective in long term so psychoanalysis is better in long term
    Side effects of BZs cognitive impairment

    Then outlined ect
    then evaluated this fully again. Such as strengths like comer found 60-70% had significant improvements after using ect.
    sachiem found high relapse rates. Etc
    doh report found 30% reported psychological side effects thus another weakness of ect.
    can i possibly get 12 marks ?
    Offline

    8
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by studentwiz)
    it shows the 2 variables what?
    the 2 variables present does it get me a mark
    Offline

    0
    ReputationRep:
    Which were the 'discuss' questions?
    Offline

    1
    ReputationRep:
    For the question on Janet did anyone write about role conflict? Like trying to balance a home life eg. Planning daughters wedding and worklife put great stress on her and this is supported by a studio done by Horensey? Hornsey? (Can't remember what I wrote in the exam and I deffo can't remember it now but it exists) and he found those who said they had role conflict had higher stress levels.. Completely missed the fact that it was on about workload and control do you think I'll get ANY marks at all??
    Offline

    9
    ReputationRep:
    Guys will I get full marks for the 4 marker on daily hassles if I just put the names of the researchers and their findings only and no aim, procedure or conclusion? I did findings from 4 different studies - 2 by delongis, 1 by kanner and 1 by gervais? but not the rest of the details were as my friends did, did anyone else?
    Also for how psychologists deal with ethical issues, I just put a list but did not elaborate on any point or give examples. I just wrote prior general consent, debrief, make them aware of their right to withdraw, ensure they don't cause any psychological harm etc. will I still get the marks or not?
    Finally, for SIT I wrote about all 3 phases in good detail but did not use an example as a whole, will this be a problem?
    thanks me lovelies
    Offline

    1
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by Elliemoore97)
    Which were the 'discuss' questions?
    Discuss biological treatments for abnormality
    Offline

    2
    ReputationRep:
    Did anyone else learn about Kanner or Delongis et al for daily hassles? Everyone seemed to know Gervais but I've never been taught that
    Also, if I put both anti-depressants (MAOI's and SSRI's) and anti-psychotics but forgot to put ECT for the essay, could I still get full marks for outline because I wrote quite a lot of detail for each.
    Offline

    2
    ReputationRep:
    Guys for the social change qs I wrote about the snowball effect in alot of detail then wrote results and conclusion of Moscovicis study was that what you were meant to do? Thanks
    Offline

    2
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by marsbar135)
    Guys will I get full marks for the 4 marker on daily hassles if I just put the names of the researchers and their findings only and no aim, procedure or conclusion? I did findings from 4 different studies - 2 by delongis, 1 by kanner and 1 by gervais? but not the rest of the details were as my friends did, did anyone else?
    Also for how psychologists deal with ethical issues, I just put a list but did not elaborate on any point or give examples. I just wrote prior general consent, debrief, make them aware of their right to withdraw, ensure they don't cause any psychological harm etc. will I still get the marks or not?
    Finally, for SIT I wrote about all 3 phases in good detail but did not use an example as a whole, will this be a problem?
    thanks me lovelies
    Yes for the daily hassles one because the question only referred to 'findings'!
    I think your answer for the ethical issues sounds good, I put that kind of thing as well.
    What do you mean for an example as a whole for SIT?
    Offline

    2
    ReputationRep:
    Did we need to include research in the 12-marker?
    Offline

    2
    ReputationRep:
    Did you have to describe drugs for A01 in the 12 markers or could you just do ECT?
    Offline

    2
    ReputationRep:
    For the 12 marker i talked about anti psycotoic drugs, anti depressants as well as BZs and beta blockers
    i then evaluated this fully with like 2 strengths and 2 weaknesses
    such as the WHO found anti-pscyotic were superior to placebos proving its effectiveness
    drugs only treat symptoms of abnormality not causes so ineffective in long term so psychoanalysis is better in long term
    Side effects of BZs cognitive impairment

    Then outlined ect
    then evaluated this fully again. Such as strengths like comer found 60-70% had significant improvements after using ect.
    sachiem found high relapse rates. Etc
    doh report found 30% reported psychological side effects thus another weakness of ect.
    can i possibly get 12 marks ?

    Thanks guys 😀
    Offline

    3
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by K3lvin)
    the 2 variables present does it get me a mark
    no, you had to say a benefit of using scattergraphs
    Offline

    1
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by Whilerisleeps)
    For the question on Janet did anyone write about role conflict? Like trying to balance a home life eg. Planning daughters wedding and worklife put great stress on her and this is supported by a studio done by Horensey? Hornsey? (Can't remember what I wrote in the exam and I deffo can't remember it now but it exists) and he found those who said they had role conflict had higher stress levels.. Completely missed the fact that it was on about workload and control do you think I'll get ANY marks at all??
    ...anyone??
    Offline

    0
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by jnenp)
    I completely ignored this when revising and it's the only thing I didn't revise!!! Just my luck. I basically wrote about what a daily hassle was and gave an example and said how some psychologists say that they could be more detrimental than life changes (completely bullsh*tted it)
    Yeah same, I just thought that I could get away with knowing a bit about daily hassles, it messed me up
    Offline

    1
    ReputationRep:
    What are the benefits of using scatttergraphs?
 
 
 
Reply
Submit reply
Turn on thread page Beta
Updated: January 10, 2018
Poll
“Yanny” or “Laurel”

The Student Room, Get Revising and Marked by Teachers are trading names of The Student Room Group Ltd.

Register Number: 04666380 (England and Wales), VAT No. 806 8067 22 Registered Office: International House, Queens Road, Brighton, BN1 3XE

Write a reply...
Reply
Hide
Reputation gems: You get these gems as you gain rep from other members for making good contributions and giving helpful advice.